Skip to main content

Combining Multiple Knowledge Bases by Negotiation: A Possibilistic Approach

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3571))

Abstract

A negotiation model consists of two functions: a negotiation function and a weakening function. A negotiation function is defined to choose the weakest sources and these sources will weaken their point of view using a weakening function. However, the currently available belief negotiation models are based on classical logic, which make it difficult to define weakening functions. In this paper, we define a prioritized belief negotiation model in the framework of possibilistic logic. The priority between formulae provides us with important information to decide which beliefs should be discarded. The problem of merging uncertain information from different sources is then solved by two steps. First, beliefs in the original knowledge bases will be weakened to resolve inconsistencies among them. This step is based on a prioritized belief negotiation model. Second, the knowledge bases obtained by the first step are combined using a conjunctive operator or a reinforcement operator in possbilistic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: From semantic to syntactic approaches to information combination in possibilistic logic. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B. (ed.) Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information, pp. 141–151. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.A.: A Practical Approach to Fusing Prioritized Knowledge Bases. In: Proc. of 9th Portuguese Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 223–236 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Some syntactic approaches to the handling of inconsistent knowledge bases: A comparative study. Part 2: The prioritized case. In: Logic at work: essays dedicated to the memory of Helena Rasiowa / Ewa Orlowska, pp. 473–511. Physica-Verlag, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34, 217–252 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Benferhat, S., Garcia, L.: Handling locally stratified inconsistent knowledge bases. Studia Logica 70, 77–104 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Booth, R.: A Negotiation-style Framework for Non-prioritized Revision. In: Proc. of TARK 2001, pp. 137–150 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Booth, R.: Social Contraction and Belief Negotiation. In: Proc. of KR 2002, pp. 374–384 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dalal, M.: Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report. In: Proc. of AAAI 1988, pp. 475–479 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic. In: Handbook of logic in Aritificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 3, pp. 439–513. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois, D., Konieczny, S., Prade, H.: Quasi-possibilistic logic and its measures of information and conflict. Fundamenta Informaticae 57(2-4), 101–125 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux-Modeling the Dynamic of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Mass (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konieczny, S.: Belief base merging as a game. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(3), 275–294 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.: Merging databases under constraints. International Journal of Cooperative information Systems 7(1), 55–76 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A. (2005). Combining Multiple Knowledge Bases by Negotiation: A Possibilistic Approach. In: Godo, L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27326-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31888-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics