Skip to main content

Belief Revision of GIS Systems: The Results of REV!GIS

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005)

Abstract

This paper presents a synthesis of works performed on the practical tractability of revision on geographic information within the european REV!GIS project.It surveys di.erent representations of the revision problem as well as di.erent implementations of the adopted stategy: Removed Set Revision (RSR). A comparison of the representation formalisms is provided, a formal and an experimental comparison is conducted on the various implementations on real scale applications in the context of GIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellicha, A., et al.: Autour du problème de satisfaction de contraintes. In: Actes des 5èmes journées nationales du PRC GDR Intelligence Artificielle, pp. 159–178 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1993, pp. 640–645 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennaim, J., Benferhat, S., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: An answer set programming approach of prioritized removed sets revision: Application to gis. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 604–616. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant, R.E.: Graph-based algorithms for boolean function manipulation. IEEE Transactions on computers C-35(8), 677–691 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An Extensible SAT-solver. In: Proc. of ICTAS 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Kleer, J.: Using crude probability estimates to guide diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence 45, 381–392 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeansoulin, R., Papini, O.: Révision et information spatiale. In: Le temps, l’espace et l’evolutif en sciences du traitement de l’information, pp. 293–304. Cépadues-éditions (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khelfallah, M., Wilson, N., Jeansoulin, R.: Geographic Information Revision based on linear constraints. Tech. Rep., Annex 313.4 of report R313, REVIGIS project (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Kleer, J.: An assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence 28, 127–162 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nebel, B.: Syntax based approaches to belief revision. In: Gärdenfors, P. (ed.) Belief Revision, pp. 52–88. Cambridge University Press, UK (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Niemela, I., Simons, P.: An implementation of stable model and well-founded semantics for normal logic programs. In: Fuhrbach, U., Dix, J., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1265, pp. 420–429. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Papini, O.: A complete revision function in propositionnal calculus. In: Neumann, B. (ed.) Proc. of ECAI 1992, pp. 339–343. John Wiley and Sons. Ltd, Chichester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raclot, D., Puech, C.: Photographies aériennes et inondation: globalisation d’informations floues par un système de contraintes pour définir les niveaux d’eau en zone inondée. Revue internationale de géomatique 8(1), 191–206 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lagrue, S., Devillers, R., Besqueut, J.-Y.: Partially ordered preferences applied to the site location problem in urban planning. In: Galindo, F., Takizawa, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) DEXA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3180, pp. 151–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, N.: The logic of linear constraints and its application to the flooding problem. Technical report, REVIGIS project report (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson, N., Khelfallah, M., Jeansoulin, R.: Geographic information revision based on linear constraints. Technical report, REVIGIS project- Annex 313.4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wurbel, E., Jeansoulin, R., Papini, O.: Spatial information revision: A comparision between 3 approaches. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 454–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Würbel, E., Jeansoulin, R., Papini, O.: Revision: An application in the framework of gis. In: Proc. of KR 2000, pp. 505–516. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Würbel, É., Jeansoulin, R., Papini, O.: Spatial information revision: A comparison between 3 approaches. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 454–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Benferhat, S. et al. (2005). Belief Revision of GIS Systems: The Results of REV!GIS. In: Godo, L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27326-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31888-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics