Skip to main content

Model-Equivalent Reductions

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3569))

Abstract

In this paper, the notions of polynomial–time model equivalent reduction and polynomial–space model equivalent reduction are introduced in order to investigate in a subtle way the expressive power of different theories. We compare according to these notions some classes of propositional formulas and quantified Boolean formulas. Our results show that classes of theories with the same complexity might have different representation strength under some conjectures which are widely believed to be true in computation complexity theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Eliyahu, R., Dechter, R.: Default Logic, Propositional Logic and Constraints. In: Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1991) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cadoli, M., Donini, F.M., Schaerf, M.: Is Intractability of Nonmonotonic Reasoning a Real Drawback. Artificial intelligence 88(2), 215–251 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, K.: Negation as failure. In: Gallaire, H., Minker, J. (eds.) Logic and Data Bases, pp. 293–322. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebbinhaus, H.D., Flum, J.: Finite Model Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: On the Computational Cost of Disjunctive Logic Programming: Propositional Case. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 15, 289–323 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fages, F.: Consistency of Clark’s Completion and Existence of Stable Models. Journal of Methods of Logic in Computer Science 1, 51–60 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flögel, A.: Resolution für Quantifizierte Boole’sche Formeln, Disertation, Paderborn University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greenlaw, R., Hoover, H.J., Ruzzo, W.L.: Limits to Parallep Computation: P-Completeness theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Database. New Generation Computing 9, 365–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gogic, G., Kautz, H., Papadimitriou, C., Selman, B.: The Comparative Liguistics of Knowledge Representation. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1995, Montreal, Canada (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karpinski, M., Kleine Büning, H., Schmitt, P.H.: On the Computational Complexity of Quantified Horn Clauses. In: Börger, E., Kleine Büning, H., Richter, M.M. (eds.) CSL 1987. LNCS, vol. 329, pp. 129–137. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kleine Büning, H., Lettmann, T.: Propositional Logic: Deduction and Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kleine Büning, H., Zhao, X.: Equivalence Models for Quantified Boolean Formulas. In: Hoos, H.H., Mitchell, D.G. (eds.) SAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3542, pp. 224–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, D.S.: A Catalog of Complexity Classes. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. A, pp. 67–161. Elsevier Science Publisher (North-Holland), Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J., Lin, F.: Loop Formulas for Circumscription. In: AAAI 2004, pp. 281–286 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: Loop Formulas for Disjunctive Logic Programs. In: Palamidessi, C. (ed.) ICLP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2916, pp. 451–465. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Lifschitz, V., Razborov, A.: Why Are There So Many Loop Formulas (2003) (Manuscription)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Strongly Equivalent Logic Programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2, 526–541 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, F., Zhao, Y.: ASSAT: Computing Answer Sets of a Logic Program by SAT Solvers. Artifficial Intelligence 157, 115–137 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Konolige, K.: On the Relation between Default and Autoepistemic Logic. Artificial Intelligence 35(3), 343–382 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Marek, W., Truszczyński, M.: Nonmonotonic Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Spira, P.M.: On Time Hardware Complexity Tradeoffs for Boolean Functions. In: Proceedings of the 4th Hawaii Symposium on System Science, Western Periodicals Company, North Hollywood, pp. 525–527 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tseitin, G.S.: On the Complexity of Derivation in Propositional Calculus. In: Silenko, A.O. (ed.) Studies in Constructive Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part II, pp. 115–125 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Büning, H.K. (2005). Model-Equivalent Reductions. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing. SAT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3569. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26276-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31679-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics