Skip to main content

A Framework for Linking Projects and Project Management Methods

  • Conference paper
  • 1414 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3547))

Abstract

Software development processes such as the Waterfall process and Extreme Programming are project management methods (PMMs) which are well known and widely used. However, conventional project management (PM) lacks the process concepts expressed in PMMs, and the connection between PMMs and PM is not much explored in the literature.

We present data models for PM and PMM, in a framework that can articulate the PM–to–PMM relationship, illustrating with simple examples. A java/XML implementation of this framework can create and then revise a “PMM–aware” project, conforming to a specified PMM. In terms of the framework, we describe a simple project data visualization and associated method that can be used to synthesize a PMM for a project instance that was initially created without reference to any PMM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burbridge, R.N.G.: Introduction. In: Burbridge, R.N.G. (ed.) Perspectives on Project Management. IEE Management of Technology Series, vol. 7, pp. xv–xxv. IEE, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Standish: Extreme Chaos. The Standish Group (2001), http://www.standishgroup.com

  3. Standish: The Chaos Chronicles. The Standish Group (1994), http://www.standishgroup.com

  4. Lewis, J.: Fundamentals of Project Management. AMACOM, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Microsoft: Microsoft Project 2003. Microsoft Corporation (2003), http://www.microsoft.com/

  6. Flowers, S.: Software Failure, Management Failure: Amazing Stories and Cautionary Tales. Wiley, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, T., Bicknell, D.: Crash, Ten Easy Ways to Avoid a Computer Disaster. Simon and Schuster (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Small, D.F.: Ministerial Inquiry into INCIS. Wellington, NZ Justice Department (2000), http://www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/2000/incis_rpt/index.html

  9. Hult, R., Hallendal, M., del Castillo, A.: Planner, a Project Management Application for the Gnome Desktop (2004), http://www.imendio.org/projects/planner/

  10. Gray, C.F., Larson, E.W. (eds.): Project Management, The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fayolle, A., Scheller, M., Roberts, J.: PyGantt, a Gantt Chart Generation Tool (2000–3), http://www.logilab.org/pygantt , Logiclab http://www.logilab.org/

  12. PMXML: Project Management XML Schema. Pacific Edge Software (2000), http://www.projectoffice.com/xml/

  13. Gantt, H.L.: Organizing for Work. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London (1919)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schach, S.R. (ed.): Object–Oriented and Classical Software Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 6th edn. XP series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Royce, W.W.: Managing the Development of Large Software Systems: Concepts and Techniques. In: IEEE WESTCON, Los Angeles, pp. 1–9 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  17. BPML: Business Process Markup Language. BPMI Initiative (2000), http://www.bpmi.org/

  18. Boehm, C., Jacopini, G.: Flow Diagrams, Turing Machines and Languages with only Two Formation Rules. Communications of the ACM, 366–371 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Westfechtel, B.: Models and Tools for Managing Development Processes. LNCS, vol. 1646. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. XML: Extensible Markup Language: XML (1998), http://www.w3.org/xml

  21. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object–Oriented Software. Addison–Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dale, T.: TPMM and PM/PMM framework (2005), http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/tony.dale/msc/index.html

  23. DOM: Document Object Model Level 3 Core Specification. The W3C Consortium (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407/

  24. XSD: XML Schema Definition. The W3C Consortium (2001), http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dale, T., Churcher, N., Irwin, W. (2005). A Framework for Linking Projects and Project Management Methods. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3547. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11497455_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11497455_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26200-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31640-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics