Hardness of Optimal Spaced Seed Design

  • François Nicolas
  • Eric Rivals
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3537)


Speeding up approximate pattern matching is a line of research in stringology since the 80’s. Practically fast approaches belong to the class of filtration algorithms, in which text regions dissimilar to the pattern are excluded (filtered out) in a first step, and remaining regions are compared to the pattern by dynamic programming in a second step. Among the necessary conditions used to test similarity between the regions and the pattern, many require a minimum number of common substrings between them. When only substitutions are taken into account for measuring dissimilarity, it was shown recently that counting spaced subwords instead of substrings improve the filtration efficiency. However, a preprocessing step is required to design one or more patterns, called gapped seeds, for the subwords, depending on the search parameters. The seed design problems proposed up to now differ by the way the similarities to detect are given: either a set of similarities is given in extenso (this is a “region specific” problem), or one wishes to detect all similar regions having at most k substitutions (general detection problem). Several articles exhibit exponential algorithms for these problems. In this work, we provide hardness and inapproximability results for both the region specific and general seed design problems, thereby justifying the exponential complexity of known algorithms. Moreover, we introduce a new formulation of the region specific seed design problem, in which the weight of the seed (i.e., number of characters in the subwords) has to be maximized, and show it is as difficult to approximate than Maximum Independent Set.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Meyers, E.W., Lipman, D.J.: Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215(3), 403–410 (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babcock, W.C.: Intermodulation interference in radio systems. Bell System Technical Journal 32(1), 63–73 (1953)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhardt, S., Crauser, A., Ferragina, P., Lenhof, H.-P., Rivals, E., Vingron, M.: qgram Based Database Searching Using a Suffix Array (QUASAR). In: Third Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, Lyon, France, April 11–14, pp. 77–83. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burkhardt, S., Kärkkäinen, J.: Better filtering with gapped q-grams. Fundamenta Informaticae 56(1–2), 51–70 (2003)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Califano, A., Rigoutsos, I.: FLASH: A fast look-up algorithm for string homology. In: Hunter, L., Searls, D., Shavlik, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Menlo Park, CA, USA, July 1993, pp. 56–64. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Parameterized Complexity. Monographs in Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farach-Colton, M., Landau, G.M., Cenk Sahinalp, S., Tsur, D.: Optimal spaced seeds that avoid false negatives,
  8. 8.
    Feige, U.: A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 45(4), 634–652 (1998)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York (1979)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Håstad, J.: Clique is hard to approximate within n1 − ε. Acta Mathematica 182, 105–142 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kucherov, G., Noé, L., Roytberg, M.: Multi-seed lossless filtration. In: Sahinalp, S.C., Muthukrishnan, S.M., Dogrusoz, U. (eds.) CPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3109, pp. 297–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, M., Ma, B., Kisman, D., Tromp, J.: PatternHunter II: Highly sensitive and fast homology search. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 2(3), 417–439 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma, B., Tromp, J., Li, M.: Patternhunter: faster and more sensitive homology search. Bioinformatics 18(3), 440–445 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noé, L., Kucherov, G.: Improved hit criteria for DNA local alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 5(149) (2004), doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Nicolas
    • 1
  • Eric Rivals
    • 1
  1. 1.L.I.R.M.M. University of Montpellier II, CNRS U.M.R. 5506Montpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations