Skip to main content

Measuring Attractiveness of Rules from the Viewpoint of Knowledge Representation, Prediction and Efficiency of Intervention

  • Conference paper
Advances in Web Intelligence (AWIC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3528))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Rules mined from a data set represent knowledge patterns relating premises and decisions in ’if ..., then ...’ statements. Premise is a conjunction of elementary conditions relative to independent variables and decision is a conclusion relative to dependent variables. Given a set of rules, it is interesting to rank them with respect to some attractiveness measures. In this paper, we are considering rule attractiveness measures related to three semantics: knowledge representation, prediction and efficiency of intervention based on a rule. Analysis of existing measures leads us to a conclusion that the best suited measures for the above semantics are: support and certainty, a Bayesian confirmation measure, and two measures related to efficiency of intervention, respectively. These five measures induce a partial order in the set of rules. For building a strategy of intervention, we propose rules discovered using the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach – the “at least” type rules indicate opportunities for improving assignment of objects, and the “at most” type rules indicate threats for deteriorating assignment of objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayardo, R.J., Agrawal, R.: Mining the most interesting rules. In: Proc. of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD Int’l. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 145–154 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eells, E., Fitelson, B.: Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support. Philosophical Studies 107(2), 129–142 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitelson, B.: Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin – Madison (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Knowledge Discovery – (I) General Perspective (II) Extensions and Applications. (Ch.20, 21) In: Zhong, N., Liu, J. (eds.) Intelligent Technologies for Information Analysis, pp. 513–612. Springer, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Pappalardo, N., Słowiński, R.: Measuring expected effects of interventions based on decision rules. Journal of Experimental and Applied Artificial Intelligence 17(1-2), 103–118 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z., Słowiński, R.: Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17(4), 345–361 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilderman, R.J., Hamilton, H.J.: Knowledge Discovery and Measures of Interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kyburg, H.: Recent work in inductive logic. In: Lucey, K.G., Machan, T.R. (eds.) Recent Work in Philosophy. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, N.J, pp. 89–150 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Popper, K.R.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London (1959)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough Set Based Decision Support. In: Burke, E., Kendall, G. (eds.) Introductory Tutorials on Optimization, Search and Decision Support Methodologies, Ch.15. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsay, L.-S., Raś, Z.: Action rule discovery: system DEAR2, method and experiments. Journal of Experimental and Applied Artificial Intelligence 17(1-2), 119–128 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N.: An analysis of quantitative measures associated with rules. In: Zhong, N., Zhou, L. (eds.) PAKDD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1574, pp. 479–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Słowiński, R., Greco, S. (2005). Measuring Attractiveness of Rules from the Viewpoint of Knowledge Representation, Prediction and Efficiency of Intervention. In: Szczepaniak, P.S., Kacprzyk, J., Niewiadomski, A. (eds) Advances in Web Intelligence. AWIC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3528. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11495772_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11495772_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26219-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31900-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics