Abstract
The paper is concerned with ways in which we understand context. In mainstream LIS, context is construed as environment or situation, a place where work gets done, supported more or less by information objects that are retrieved from a different space. The resulting separation of object and agent underlies two significant lines of work in the LIS domain: the search for optimal access to objects and the description of human information behaviour. Performance measurement dominates the former; the latter has led to elaborate and universalist models that have little discriminatory power and whose validity is difficult to establish. Both groups are pre-occupied, in their own way, with matching agent and object, or with relevance, though the question of ’relevant to what?’ has many different answers – tasks, life mastery, leisure interests and so on. A recent ’call to order’ here suggests that ’tasks and technology’ should be the focus of LIS efforts, as these can at least support the validation of empirical work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Davenport, E. (2005). Text, Co-text, Context and the Documentary Continuum. In: Crestani, F., Ruthven, I. (eds) Context: Nature, Impact, and Role. CoLIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11495222_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11495222_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26178-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32101-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)