Skip to main content

Using Independence Assumption to Improve Multimodal Biometric Fusion

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 3541))

Abstract

There is an increased interest in the combination of biometric matchers for person verification. Matchers of different modalities can be considered as independent 2-class classifiers. This work tries to answer the question of whether assumption of the classifier independence could be used to improve the combination method. The combination added error was introduced and used to evaluate performance of various combination methods. The results show that using independence assumption for score density estimation indeed improves combination performance. At the same time it is likely that a generic classifier like SVM will still perform better. The magnitudes of experimentally evaluated combination added errors are relatively small, which means that choice of the combination method is not really important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tumer, K., Ghosh, J.: Linear and order statistics combiners for pattern classification. In: Sharkey, A.J.C. (ed.) Combining Artificial Neural Nets: Ensembles and Multi-Net Systems, pp. 127–162. Springer-Verlag, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuncheva, L.: A theoretical study on six classifier fusion strategies. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24(2), 281–286 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fumera, G., Roli, F.: Performance analysis and comparison of linear combiners for classifier fusion. In: SSPR/SPR, pp. 424–432 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fumera, G., Roli, F.: Analysis of error-reject trade-off in linearly combined multiple classifiers. Pattern Recognition 37, 1245–1265 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexandre, L.A., Campilho, A.C., Kamel, M.: On combining classifiers using sum and product rules. Pattern Recognition Letters 22, 1283–1289 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman, B.W.: Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Beardah, C.C., Baxter, M.: The archaeological use of kernel density estimates. Internet Archaeology (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duin, R., Juszczak, P., Paclik, P., Pekalska, E., Ridder, D.d., Tax, D.: Prtools4, a matlab toolbox for pattern recognition (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tulyakov, S., Govindaraju, V. (2005). Using Independence Assumption to Improve Multimodal Biometric Fusion. In: Oza, N.C., Polikar, R., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11494683_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11494683_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26306-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31578-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics