Advertisement

RDFSculpt: Managing RDF Schemas Under Set-Like Semantics

  • Zoi Kaoudi
  • Theodore Dalamagas
  • Timos Sellis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3532)

Abstract

The Semantic Web is an extension of the current Web in which information is given well-defined meaning to support effective data discovery and integration. The RDF framework is a key issue for the Semantic Web. It can be used in resource discovery to provide better search engine capabilities, in cataloging for describing the content of thematic hierarchies in thematic catalogs and digital libraries, in knowledge sharing and exchange of Web agents, etc. Up to now, RDF schemas have been treated rather as sets of individual elements (i.e. model primitives like classes, properties, etc.). Under that view, queries like “find the part of a portal catalog which is not present in another catalog” can be answered only in a procedural way, specifying which nodes to select and how to get them. For this reason, we argue that answering such queries requires treating schemas as a whole rather than as sets of individual elements. We introduce a set of operators with set-like semantics to manage RDF schemas. The operators can be included in any RDF query language to support manipulation of RDF schemas as full-fledged objects. We also present RDFSculpt, a prototype system that implements our framework.

References

  1. 1.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (May 2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, P.A.: Applying Model Management to Classical Meta Data Problems. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR 2003), Asilomar, CA, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broedstra, J., Kampman, A., van Harmelen, F.: Sesame: An Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, p. 54. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haase, P., Broekstra, J., Eberhart, A., Volz, R.: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 502–517. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karvounarakis, G., Alexaki, S., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D., Scholl, M.: RQL: A Declarative Query Language for RDF. In: Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magkanaraki, A., Alexaki, S., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D.: Benchmarking RDF Schemas for the Semantic Web. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, p. 132. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magkanaraki, A., Tannen, V., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D.: Viewing the Semantic Web through RVL Lenses. Journal of Web Semantics 1(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Melnik, S., Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: Rondo: A Programming Platform for Generic Model Management. In: Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Management of Data (SIGMOD) Conference, ACM SIGMOD 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G.: An Algebra for Semantic Interoperability of Information Sources. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on BioInformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE 2001), Bethesda, MD (November 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. VLDB Journal 10(4), 334–350 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W3C Recommendation. XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes, 2nd edn. (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/
  12. 12.
    Seaborne, A.: RDQL - A Query Language for RDF. W3C member submission (January 2004), http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-RDQL-20040109/
  13. 13.
    Sintek, M., Decker, S.: TRIPLE - A Query, Inference, and Transformation Language for the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the Deductive Databases and Knowledge Management Workshop (DDLP 2001), Tokyo, Japan (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W3C. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0.2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/
  15. 15.
    Wiederhold, G.: An Algebra for Ontology Composition. In: Proceedings of the Monterey Workshop on Formal Methods, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoi Kaoudi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Theodore Dalamagas
    • 2
  • Timos Sellis
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Electronic and Computer EngineeringTechnical University of CreteGreece
  2. 2.School of Electr. and Comp. EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations