Towards Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities

  • John G. Breslin
  • Andreas Harth
  • Uldis Bojars
  • Stefan Decker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3532)


Online community sites have replaced the traditional means of keeping a community informed via libraries and publishing. At present, online communities are islands that are not interlinked. We describe different types of online communities and tools that are currently used to build and support such communities. Ontologies and Semantic Web technologies offer an upgrade path to providing more complex services. Fusing information and inferring links between the various applications and types of information provides relevant insights that make the available information on the Internet more valuable. We present the SIOC ontology which combines terms from vocabularies that already exist with new terms needed to describe the relationships between concepts in the realm of online community sites.


Social Networking Site Online Community Mailing List Bulletin Board Conjunctive Query 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Beckett, D.: The Design and Implementation of the Redland RDF Application Framework. Computer Networks 39(5), 577–588 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowman, C.M., Danzig, P.B., Hardy, D.R., Manber, U., Schwartz, M.F.: The Harvest information discovery and access system. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28(1-2), 119–125 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., van Harmelen, F.: Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 54–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Florescu, D., Levy, A.Y., Mendelzon, A.O.: Database Techniques for the World-Wide Web: A Survey. SIGMOD Record 27(3), 59–74 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harth, A., Decker, S.: Yet Another RDF Store: Complete Index Structures for Storing Semantic Web Data With Contexts. DERI Technical Report (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lara, R., Han, S.-K., Lausen, H., Stollberg, M., Ding, Y., Fensel, D.: An Evaluation of Semantic Web Portals. In: IADIS Applied Computing International Conference 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, March 23-26 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miles, A.J., Rogers, N., Beckett, D.: SKOS Core RDF Vocabulary (2004),
  8. 8.
    Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., Risch, T.: EDUTELLA: a P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In: WWW, pp. 604–615 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seaborne, A.: An RDF NetAPI. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 399–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilkinson, K., Sayers, C., Kuno, H.A., Reynolds, D.: Efficient RDF Storage and Retrieval in Jena2. In: Proceedings of SWDB 2003, The first International Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases, Co-located with VLDB 2003, pp. 131–150 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Breslin
    • 1
  • Andreas Harth
    • 1
  • Uldis Bojars
    • 1
  • Stefan Decker
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)GalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations