Skip to main content

The Chisholm Paradox and the Situation Calculus

  • Conference paper
Book cover Foundations of Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3488))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Deontic logic is appropriate to model a wide variety of legal arguments, however this logic suffers from certain paradoxes of which the so-called Chisholm paradox is one of the most notorious. We propose a formalisation of the Chisholm set in the framework of the situation calculus. We utilise this alternative to modal logic for formalising the obligations of the agent and avoiding the Chisholm paradox. This new approach makes use of the notion of obligation fluents together with their associated successor state axioms. Furthermore, some results about automated reasoning in the situation calculus can be applied in order to consider a tractable implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chisholm, R.: Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis 24, 33–36 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reiter, R.: The frame problem in the situation calculus: a simple solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression. In: Lifschitz, V. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy, pp. 359–380. Academic Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pozos Parra, P., Nayak, A., Demolombe, R.: Theories of Intentions in the framework of Situation Calculus. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies at AAMAS, New York, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demolombe, R., Herzig, A.: Obligation change in dependence logic and situation calculus. In: Workshop on Deontic Logic and Computer Science (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reiter, R.: Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Carmo, J., Jones, A.: Deontic logic and different levels of ideality. RRDMIST 1/95 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmo, J., Jones, A.: Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 8. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prakken, H., Sergot, M.: Contrary-to-duty obligations. Studia Logica 57, 91–115 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demolombe, R., Pozos-Parra, P. (2005). The Chisholm Paradox and the Situation Calculus. In: Hacid, MS., Murray, N.V., Raś, Z.W., Tsumoto, S. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3488. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11425274_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11425274_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25878-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31949-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics