Skip to main content

Aggregates and Preferences in Logic Programming

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3488))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1089 Accesses

Abstract

The present work proposes a new semantics for logic program with preference rules and studies logic programs enriched with both aggregates and preference rules. The interest of research literature in handling user preferences to express a partial order on rules and literals is reflected by an extensive number of proposals. The association of aggregates and preferences is, here, used to also express a partial order on global models, other than on literals and rules, so that optimization problems can be expressed in a simple and elegant way. The use of aggregates makes logic languages more flexible and intuitive, without any additional computational complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Preferred Answer Sets for Extended Logic Programs. Artificial Intelligence 109(1-2), 297–356 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Brewka, G.: Logic programming with ordered disjunction. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 100–105 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer Set Optimization. IJCAI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buccafurri, F., Faber, W., Leone, N.: Disjunctive deductive databases with inheritance. In: Int. Conf. on Logc Programming, pp. 79–93 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brewka, G.: Complex Preferences for Answer Set Optimization. In: KR, pp. 213–223 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H.: Logic Programs with Compiled Preferences. In: ECAI, pp. 464–468 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H.: A Framework for Compiling Preferences in Logic Programs. TPLP 3(2), 129–187 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Mannila, H.: Disjunctive Datalog. TODS 22(3), 364–418 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: Proc. of Fifth Conf. on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Databases. New Generation Computing 9, 365–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelfond, M., Son, T.C.: Reasoning with prioritized defaults. In: LPKR, pp. 164–223 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Govindarajan, K., Jayaraman, B., Mantha, S.: Preference Logic Programming. In: ICLP, pp. 731–746 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greco, S.: Dynamic Programming in Datalog with Aggregates. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 11(2), 265–283 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greco, S., Saccà, D.: Search and Optimization Problems in Datalog. In: Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, pp. 61–82 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Przymusinski, T.: Stable semantics for disjunctive programs. NGC 9(3/4), 401–424 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: Representing priorities in logic programs. In: JICSLP, pp. 82–96 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: Priorized logic programming and its application to commonsense reasoning. Artificial Intelligence (123), 185–222 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schaub, T., Wang, K.: A Comparative Study of Logic Programs with Preference. In: IJCAI, pp. 597–602 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wakaki, T., Inoue, K., Sakama, C., Nitta, K.: Computing Preferred Answer Sets in Answer Set Programming. In: LPAR Conf., pp. 259–273 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, X., You, J.H., Yuan, L.Y.: Nonmonotonic reasoning by monotonic inferences with priority conditions. In: NMELP, pp. 91–109 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, K., Zhou, L., Lin, F.: Alternating Fixpoint Theory for Logic Programs with Priority. Computational Logic, 164–178 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, Y., Foo, N.: Answer sets for prioritized logic programs. In: ILPS, pp. 69–83 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greco, S., Trubitsyna, I., Zumpano, E. (2005). Aggregates and Preferences in Logic Programming. In: Hacid, MS., Murray, N.V., RaÅ›, Z.W., Tsumoto, S. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3488. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11425274_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11425274_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25878-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31949-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics