Skip to main content

An Intuitive Tool for Constraint Based Grammars

  • Conference paper
Constraint Solving and Language Processing (CSLP 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3438))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 287 Accesses

Abstract

Recent linguistic theories are feature-based and heavily rely upon the concept of constraint. Several authors have pointed out the similarity existing between the representation of the features in feature-based theories and the notions of objects or frames. Object-oriented configuration allows us to deal with these modern grammars. We propose here a systematic translation of the concepts and constraints introduced by two linguistic formalisms: the recent property grammars and the HPSG theory, to configuration problems representing specific target languages. We assess the usefulness of these translations by studying first a natural language subset with lexical ambiguities, using property grammars. Detailed explanations on the solver’s behavior are given in this case. The article then presents a configuration model for a fragment of the HPSG grammar for English, together with details on implementing HPSG principles as configuration constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pollard, C., Sag, I.A.: Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blache, P.: Les Grammaires de Propriétés: des contraintes pour le traitement automatique des langues naturelles. Hermès Sciences (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duchier, D.: Axiomatizing dependency parsing using set constraints. In: Sixth Meeting on Mathematics of Language, Orlando, Florida, pp. 115–126 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duchier, D., Debusmann, R.: Topological dependency trees: A constraint-based account of linear precedence. In: proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2001), pp. 180–187 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Estratat, M., Henocque, L.: Parsing languages with a configurator. In: Proceedings of the European Conference for Artificial Intelligence ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, pp. 591–595 (August 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mailharro, D.: A classification and constraint based framework for configuration. AI-EDAM: Special issue on Configuration 12(4), 383–397 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal, S., Falkenhainer, B.: Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1990, Boston, MA, pp. 25–32 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fleischanderl, G., Friedrich, G., Haselböck, A., Schreiner, H., Stumptner, M.: Configuring large-scale systems with generative constraint satisfaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems - Special issue on Configuration 13(7) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stumptner, M.: An overview of knowledge-based configuration. AI Communications 10(2), 111–125 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nebel, B.: Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems. LNCS, vol. 422. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Soininen, T., Niemela, I., Tiihonen, J., Sulonen, R.: Representing configuration knowledge with weight constraint rules. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symp. on Answer Set Programming: Towards Efficient and Scalable Knowledge, pp. 195–201 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Group, O.M.: UML. Technical Report 2.0, OMG (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Jannach, D., Zanker, M.: Configuration knowledge representation using UML/OCL. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on The Unified Modeling Language, pp. 49–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Estratat, M., Henocque, L.: Application des programmes de contraintes orientés objet à l’analyse du langage naturel. In: Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, TALN 2004, Fes, Morocco, pp. 163–172 (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., Sag, I.A.: Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smolka, G., Treinen, R.: Records for logic programming. The Journal of Logic Programming 18, 229–258 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Estratat, M., Henocque, L. (2005). An Intuitive Tool for Constraint Based Grammars. In: Christiansen, H., Skadhauge, P.R., Villadsen, J. (eds) Constraint Solving and Language Processing. CSLP 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3438. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11424574_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11424574_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26165-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31928-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics