Bioresources for Control of Environmental Pollution

Part of the Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology book series (ABE, volume 147)


Environmental pollution is one of the biggest threats to human beings. For practical reasons it is not possible to stop most of the activities responsible for environmental pollution; rather we need to eliminate the pollutants. In addition to other existing means, biological processes can be utilized to get rid of toxic pollutants. Degradation, removal, or deactivation of pollutants by biological means is known as bioremediation. Nature itself has several weapons to deal with natural wastage and some of them are equally active for eliminating nonnatural pollutants. Several plants, microorganisms, and some lower eukaryotes utilize environmental pollutants as nutrients and some of them are very efficient for decontaminating specific types of pollutants. If exploited properly, these natural resources have enough potential to deal with most elements of environmental pollution. In addition, several artificial microbial consortia and genetically modified organisms with high bioremediation potential were developed by application of advanced scientific tools. On the other hand, natural equilibria of ecosystems are being affected by human intervention. Rapid population growth, urbanization, and industrialization are destroying ecological balances and the natural remediation ability of the Earth is being compromised. Several potential bioremediation tools are also being destroyed by biodiversity destruction of unexplored ecosystems. Pollution management by bioremediation is highly dependent on abundance, exploration, and exploitation of bioresources, and biodiversity is the key to success. Better pollution management needs the combined actions of biodiversity conservation, systematic exploration of natural resources, and their exploitation with sophisticated modern technologies.

Graphical Abstract


Bioremediation Biodiversity Exploration Natural resources Environmental tools 


  1. 1.
    Abdallah MAM (2012) Phytoremediation of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by two aquatic macrophytes, Ceratophyllum demersum and Lemna gibba L. Environ Technol 33:1609–1614Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abhilash PC, Srivastava S, Singh N (2011) Comparative bioremediation potential of four rhizospheric microbial species against lindane. Chemosphere 82:56–63Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abreu CAD, Coscione AR, Pires AM, Paz-Ferreiro J (2012) Phytoremediation of a soil contaminated by heavy metals and boron using castor oil plants and organic matter amendments. J Geochem Explor 123:3–7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abulencia CB, Wyborski DL, Garcia JA et al (2006) Environmental whole-genome amplification to access microbial populations in contaminated sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3291–3301Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Acevedo F, Pizzul L, Castillo MDP, Cuevas R, Diez MC (2011) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by the Chilean white-rot fungus Anthracophyllum discolor. J Hazard Mater 185:212–219Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agarwal SK (1998) Environmental biotechnology. APH Publishing Corporation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Bader D, Eliyas M, Rayan R, Radwan S (2012) Air–dust-borne associations of phototrophic and hydrocarbon-utilizing microorganisms: promising consortia in volatile hydrocarbon bioremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:3997–4005Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alisi C, Musellar R, Tasso F et al (2009) Bioremediation of diesel oil in a co-contaminated soil by bioaugmentation with a microbial formula tailored with native strains selected for heavy metals resistance. Sci Total Environ 407:3024–3032Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alvarado S, Guedez S, Lue-Meru MP et al (2008) Arsenic removal from waters by bioremediation with the aquatic plants Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and Lesser Duckweed (Lemna minor). Biores Technol 99:8436–8440Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ameh AO, Mohammed-Dabo IA, Ibrahim S, Ameh JB (2013) Earthworm-assisted bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil from mechanic workshop. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 7:531–539Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atagana HI (2011) Bioremediation of co-contamination of crude oil and heavy metals in soil by phytoremediation using Chromolaena odorata (L) king & HE Robinson. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:261–271Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atlas RM (2011) Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: a tale of the two worst spills in US history. Environ Sci Technol 45:6709–6715Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Augustynowicz J, Kyziol-Komosinska J, Smolen S, Waloszek A (2013) Study on chromium-binding capacity of Callitriche cophocarpain an aquatic environment. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64:410–418Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babu AG, Kim JD, Oh BT (2013) Enhancement of heavy metal phytoremediation by Alnus firma with endophytic Bacillus thuringiensis GDB-1. J Hazard Mater 250–251:477–483Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bacchetta G, Cao A, Cappai G, Casti CM, Fercia ML, Lonis R, Fola F (2012) A field experiment on the use of Pistacia lentiscus L. and Scrophularia canina L. subsp. Bicolor (Sibth. et Sm.) Greuter for the phytoremediation of abandoned mining areas. Plant Biosys 146:1054–1063Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baird WE, Panda J, Lang WJ (2002) Success story. Pollut Eng 34:18–19Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barbafieri M, Dadia C, Tassi E, Bretzel F, Fanfani L (2011) Uptake of heavy metals by native species growing in a mining area in Sardina, Italy: discovering native flora for phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremed 13:985–997Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barrutia O, Artexe U, Hernandez A et al (2011) Native plant communities in an abandoned Pb-Zn mining area of northern Spain: implication for phytoremediation and germ plasm preservation. Int J Phytoremed 13:256–270Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beattie AJ, Hay M, Magnusson B, Nys R, Smeathers J, Vincent JFV (2011) Ecology and bioprospecting. Austral Ecol 36:341–356Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Benazir JF, Suganthi R, Rajvel D, Pooja MP, Mathithumilan B (2010) Bioremediation of chromium in tannery effluent by microbial consortia. Afr J Biotechnol 9:3140–3143Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benimeli CS, Fuentes MS, Abate CM, Amoroso MJ (2008) Bioremediation of lindane-contaminated soil by Streptomyces sp. M7and its effects on Zea mays growth. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 61:233–239Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bento RA, Saggin-Junior OJ, Pitard RM et al (2012) Selection of leguminous trees associated with symbiont microorganisms for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:5659–5671Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bestawy EE, Helmy S, Hussein H, Fahmy M, Amer R (2013) Bioremediation of heavy metal-contaminated effluent using optimized activated sludge bacteria. Appl Water Sci 3:181–192Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bhowmik A, Asahino A, Shiraki T, Nakamura K, Takamizawa K (2009) In situ study of tetrachloroethylene bioremediation with different microbial community shifting. Environ Technol 30:1607–1614Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Binga EK, Lasken RS, Neufeld JD (2008) Mini-review: something from (almost) nothing: the impact of multiple displacement amplification on microbial ecology. ISME J 2:233–241Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bjedov I, Tenaillon O, Gerard B et al (2003) Stress induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Science 300:1404–1409Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boopathy R (2000) Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour Technol 74:63–67Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braddock JF, Lindsdorm JE, Brown RJ (1995) Distribution of hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms in sediments from Prince William Sound, Alaska, following the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Mar Pollut Bull 30:125–132Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Buenz EJ, Schnepple DJ, Bauer BA, Riddle JM, Motley TJ (2004) Techniques: bioprospecting historical herbal texts by hunting for new leads in old tomes. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:494–498Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cea M, Jorquera M, Ribilar O, Langer H, Tortella G, Diez MC (2010) Bioremediation of soil contaminated with pentachlorophenol by Anthracophyllum discolor and its effect on soil microbial community. J Hazard Mater 181:315–323Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chakraborty R, Wu CH, Hazen TC (2012) Systems biology approach to bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:483–490Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chaudhary VK, Borah D (2011) Isolation and molecular characterization of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria from tannery effluent. Int J Plant Anim Env Sci 1:110–114Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen J, Yang Q, Huang T, Zhang Y, Ding R (2011) Enhanced bioremediation of soil contaminated with viscous oil through microbial consortium construction and ultraviolet mutation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1381–1389Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chikere CB (2013) Application of molecular microbiology techniques in bioremediation of hydrocarbons and other pollutants. Br Biotechnol J 3:90–115Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chiu SY, Kao CY, Huang TT et al (2011) Microalgal biomass production and on-site bioremediation of carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide from flue gas using Chlorella sp. Cultures. Bioresour Technol 102:9135–9142Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Couto MNPFS, Pinto D, Basto MCP, Vasconcelos TSD (2012) Role of natural attenuation, phytoremediation and hybrid technologies in the remediation of a refinery soil with old/recent petroleum hydrocarbons contamination. Environ Technol 33:2097–2104Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cowan D, Meyer Q, Stafford W, Muyanga S, Cameron R, Wittwer P (2005) Metagenomic genediscovery: past, present and future. Trends Biotechnol 23:321–329Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Daniel R (2005) The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:470–478Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Das S, Prasad P (2012) Particulate matter capturing ability of some plant species: implication for phytoremediation of particulate pollution around Rourkela steel plant, Rourkela, India. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 11:657–665Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Demunshi Y, Chugh A (2010) Role of traditional knowledge in marine bioprospecting. Biodivers Conserv 19:3015–3033Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deng Q, Li QB, Lu YH, He N, Jiang J (2005) Genetic engineering of E. coli SE5000 and its potential for Ni2+ bioremediation. Proc Biochem 40:425–430Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Desai C, Pathak H, Madamwar D (2010) Advances in molecular and ‘‘-omics” technologies to gauge microbial communities and bioremediation at xenobiotic/anthropogen contaminated sites. Biores Technol 101:1558–1569Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Deutschbauer AM, Chivian D, Arkin AP (2006) Genomics for environmental microbiology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:229–235Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Diez MC, Gallardo F, Tortella G, Rubilar O, Navia R, Bornhardt C (2012) Chlorophenol degradation in soil columns inoculated with Anthracophyllum discolor immobilized on wheat grains. J Envirol Manage 95:S83–S87Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Doria E, Longoni P, Scibila L, Iazzi N, Cella R, Nielsen E (2012) Isolation and characterization of a Scenedesmus acutus strain to be used for bioremediation of urban wastewater. J Appl Phycol 24:375–383Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Douglas AE (2013) Microbial brokers of insect-plant interactions revisited. J Chem Ecol 39:952–961Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Douskova I, Doucha J, Livansky K (2009) Simultaneous flue gas bioremediation and reduction of microalgal biomass production costs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:179–185Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dwivedi S, Mishra A, Kumar A et al (2012) Bioremediation potential of genus Portulaca L. collected from industrial areas in Vadodara, Gujarat, India. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:223–228Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Eisenstadt E, Warren JA, Porter J, Atkins D, Millert JH (1982) Carcinogenic epoxides of benzo[alpyrene and cyclopenta[b]pyrene induce base substitutions via specific transversions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 79:1945–1949Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fawze MA, Badr NE, El-Khatib A, Abo-El-Kassem A (2012) Heavy metal biomonitoring and phytoremediation potentialities of aquatic macrophytes in river Nile. Environ Monit Assess 184:1753–1771Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Foster PL (2007) Stress induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 42:373–397Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Garbisu C, Alkorta I (1999) Utilization of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for bioremediation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74:599–606Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Greben HA, Baloyi J, Sigama J, Venter SN (2009) Bioremediation of sulphate rich mine effluents using grass cuttings and rumen fluid microorganisms. J Geochem Explor 100:163–168Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Grosch R, Dealtry S, Schreiter S, Berg G, Mendonca-Hagler L, Smalla K (2012) Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani: complex interaction of biocontrol strains, pathogen and indigenous microbial community in the rhizosphere of lettuce shown by molecular methods. Plant Soil 361:343–357Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Godos ID, Blanco S, Garcia-Encina PA, Becares E, Munoz R (2009) Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery waste waters at high loading rates. Bioresour Technol 100:4332–4339Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ha NTH, Sakakibara M, Sano S (2011) Accumulation of Indium and other heavy metals by Eleocharis acicularis: an option for phytoremediation and phytomining. Bioresour Technol 102:2228–2234Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hernandez-Castellanos B, Ortiz-Ceballos A, Martinez-Hernandez S et al (2013) Removal of benzo (a) pyrene from soil using an endogeic earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Müller, 1857). Appl Soil Ecol 70:62–69Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hess A, Zarda B, Hahn D, Hanner A, Stax D (1997) In situ analysis of denitrifying toluene and m-xylene-degrading bacteria in a diesel fuel contaminated laboratory aquifer column. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2136–2141Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Imanaka T, Aiba S (1981) A perspective on the application of genetic engineering: stability of recombinant plasmid. Ann N Y Acad Sci 369:1–14Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jing Y-P, Liu M-Q, Yin Q-P, Li H-X, Hu F (2013) Effects of earthworms and ryegrass on the removal of fluoranthene from soil. Pedosphere 23:523–531Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Karamalidis AK, Evangelou EC, Karabika E, Koukkou AI, Drainas C, Voudrias EA (2010) Laboratory scale bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil by indigenous microorganisms and added Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Spet. Bioresour Technol 101:6545–6552Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Karigar CS, Rao SS (2011) Role of microbial enzymes in the bioremediation of pollutants: a review. Enzym Res 1 (Article ID 805187)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kinoshita K, Tamaki S, Yoshioka M et al (2008) Bioremediation of organically enriched sediment deposited below fish farms with artificially mass-cultured colonies of a deposit-feeding polychaete Capitella sp. I. Fish Sci 74:77–87Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kostka JE, Prakash O, Overholt WA et al (2011) Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial community response in Gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Appl Env Microbiol 77:7962–7974Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kotrba P, Najmanova J, Macek T, Ruml T, Mackova M (2009) Genetically modified plants in phytoremediation of heavy metal and metalloid soil and sediment pollution. Biotechnol Adv 27:799–810Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kulshreshtha S (2012) Current trends in bioremediation and biodegradation. J Bioremed Biodegrad 3:7Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kumar M, Khanna S (2009) Diversity of 16S rRNA and dioxygenase genes detected in coal-tar-contaminated site undergoing active bioremediation. J Appl Microbiol 108:1252–1262Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kumar M, Lakshmi CV, Khanna S (2008) Microbial biodiversity and in situ bioremediation of endosulfan contaminated soil. Indian J Microbiol 48:128–133Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kumar V, Dhall P, Kumar R, Singh YK, Kumar A (2012) Bioremediation of agro-based pulp mill effluent by microbial consortium comprising autochthonous bacteria. Sci World J 2012:127014Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kunihiro T, Miyazaki T, Uramoto Y (2008) The succession of microbial community in the organic richfish-farm sediment during bioremediation by introducing artificially mass-cultured colonies of a small polychaete, Capitella sp. I. Mar Pollut Bull 57:68–77Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Leal MC, Madeira C, Brandao CA, Puga J, Calado R (2012) Bioprospecting of marine invertebrates for new natural products—a chemical and zoogeographical perspective. Molecules 17:9842–9854Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lin Z, Li X-M, Li Y-T, Huang D-Y, Dong J, Li FB (2012) Enhancement effect of two ecological earthworm species (Eisenia foetida andAmynthas robustus) on removal and degradation processes of soil DDT. J Environ Monit 14:1551–1558Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Liu PWG, Chang TC, Whang LM, Kao CH, Pan PT, Cheng SS (2011) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil: Effects of strategies and microbial community shift. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 65:1119–1127Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Liu X, Ashforth E, Ren B et al (2010) Bioprospecting microbial natural product libraries from the marine environment for drug discovery. J Antibiot 63:415–422Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lorenz P, Eck J (2005) Metagenomics and industrial applications. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:510–516Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ma HW, Zeng AP (2004) Phylogenetic comparison of metabolic capacities of organisms at genome level. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:204–213Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Macci C, Doni S, Peruzzi E, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G (2012) Bioremediation of polluted soil through the combined application of plants, earthworms and organic matter. J Environ Monit 14:2710–2717Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Maiti RK, Pinero JLH, Oreja JAG, Santiago DL (2004) Plant based bioremediation and mechanism of heavy metal tolerance of plants: a review. Proc Indian Natn Sci Acad B70:1–12Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Mao J, Luo Y, Teng Y, Li Z (2012) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by a bacterial consortium and associated microbial community changes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 70:141–147Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Malayeri BE, Chehregania A, Mohsenzadeha F, Kazemeinib F, Asgaric M (2013) Plants growing in a mining area: screening for metal accumulator plants possibly useful for bioremediation. Toxicol Environ Chem 95:434–444Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Malekzadeh E, Alikhani HA, Sabaghebi-Firoozabadi GR, Zarei M (2012) Bioremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil through cultivation of maize inoculated with plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria. Bioremed J 16:204–211Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Malkawi HI, Fatmi LM, Al-Deeb TM (2009) Mutational analysis of oil degrading genes in bacterial isolates from oil contaminated soil at the Jordan oil refinery. World Appl Sci J 6:208–220Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Matin A, Little CD, Fraley CD, Keyhan M (1995) Use of starvation promoters to limit growth and select for trichloroethylene and phenol transformation activity in recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3323–3328Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    McGinn PJ, Dickinson KE, Park KC et al (2012) Assessment of the bioenergy and bioremediation potentials of the microalga Scenedesmus sp. AMDD cultivated in municipal wastewater effluent in batch and continuous mode. Algal Res 1:155–165Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mikeskova H, Novotny C, Svobodova (2012) Interspecific interactions in mixed microbial cultures in a biodegradation perspective. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:861–870Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Mishra VK, Upadhyay AR, Pathak V, Tripathi BD (2008) Phytoremediation of mercury and arsenic from tropical opencast coalmine effluent through naturally occurring aquatic macrophytes. Water Air Soil Pollut 192:303–314Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mohanty M, Pattnaik MM, Mishra Ak, Patra HK (2012) Bio-concentration of chromium—an in situ phytoremediation study at South Kaliapani chromite mining area of Orissa, India. Environ Monit Assess 184:1015–1024Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mohsenzadeh F, Nasseri S, Mesdaghinia A et al (2010) Phytoremediation of petroleum-pollutedsoils: application of Polygonum aviculare and its root-associated (penetrated) fungal strains for bioremediation of petroleum-polluted soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 73:613–619Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Moreira ITA, Oliveira OMC, Triguis JA et al (2011) Phytoremediation using Rizophora mangle L. in mangrove sediments contaminated by persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH’s). Microchemi J 99:376–382Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Moreira ITA, Oliveira OMC, Triguis JA et al (2013) Phytoremediation in mangrove sediments impacted by persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH’s) using Avicennia schaueriana. Mar Pollut Bull 67:130–136Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Morillo JA, Aguilera M, Antizar-Ladislo B, Fuentes S, Ramos-Cormenzana A, Russel NJ, Monteoliva-Sanchez M (2008) Molecular microbial and chemical investigation of the bioremediation of two-phase olive mill waste using laboratory-scale bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:309–317Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Morris BEL, Henneberger R, Hubber H, Moissl-Eichinger C (2013) Microbial syntrophy: interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:384–406Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Nam IH, Kim YM, Murugesan K, Jeon JR, Chang YY, Chang YS (2008) Bioremediation of PCDD/Fs-contaminated municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash by a potent microbial biocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 157:114–121Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nouri J, Khorasani N, Lorestani B, Karami M, Hassani AH, Yousefi N (2009) Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and uptake by plant species with phytoremediation potential. Environ Earth Sci 59:315–323Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Orandi S, Lewis DM, Moheimani NR (2012) Biofilm establishment and heavy metal removal capacity of an indigenous mining algal-microbial consortium in a photo-rotating biological contactor. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:1321–1331Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Paul D, Pandey G, Jain RK (2005) Suicidal genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation: need and perspectives. BioEssays 27:563–573Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Peng S, Zhou Q, Cai Z, Zhang Z (2009) Phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soils by Mirabilis Jalapa L. in a greenhouse plot experiment. J Hazard Mater 168:1490–1496Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Perpetuo EA, Souza CB (2011) Engineering bacteria for bioremediation. In: Carpi A (ed) Progress in molecular and environmental bioengineering—from analysis and modeling to technology applications, 1st edn. In Tech, Rijeka, pp 605–632Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Polti MA, Atjian MC, Amoroso MJ, Abate CM (2011) Soil chromium bioremediation: synergic activity of actinobacteria and plants. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65:1175–1181Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Pous N, Puig S, Coma M, Balaguer MD, Colprim J (2013) Bioremediation of nitrate-polluted groundwater in a microbial fuel cell. J Chemi Technol Biotechnol 9:1690–1696Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Prakken R (1959) Induced mutation. Euphytica 8:270–322Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Rahaman MA, Hasegawa H (2011) Aquatic arsenic: phytoremediation using floating macrophytes. Chemosphere 83:633–646Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ratnaparkhe A, Tiwari A (2011) Bioprospecting approaches for biocatalysts from extremophiles. Int J Biomed Res 2:1–17Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Robertson LA, Steer BA (2004) Recent progress in biocatalyst discovery and optimization. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:141–149Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Romeh AA (2010) Phytoremediation of water and soil contaminated with imidacloprid pesticide by Plantago major, l. Int J Phytoremed 12:188–199Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Ronner-Holm SGE, Mennerich A, Holm NC (2006) Specific SBR population behaviour as revealed by comparative dynamic simulation analysis of three full scale municipal SBR wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 54:71–79Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ronner-Holm SGE, Holm NC (2009) Reduction of emissions using biomanipulations of activated sludge: selected full-scale examples. Environ Protect Eng 35:41–51Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Ros M, Rodriguez I, Garcia C, Hernandez T (2010) Microbial communities involved in the bioremediation of an aged recalcitrant hydrocarbon polluted soil by using organic amendments. Bioresour Technol 101:6916–6923Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Rosales E, Perez-Paz A, Vazquez S, Pazos A, Sanroman MA (2012) Isolation of novel benzo[a]anthracene-degrading microorganisms and continuous bioremediation in an expanded-bed bioreactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:851–855Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rosenberg E, Bittan-Banin G, Sharon G, Shon A, Hershko G, Levy I, Ron EZ (2010) The phage-driven microbial loop in petroleum bioremediation. Microbial Biotechnol 3:467–472Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sakakibara M, Ohmori Y, Ha NTH, Sano S, Sera K (2011) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated water and sediment by Eleocharis acicularis. Clean Soil Air Water 39:735–741Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Salinas-Martinez A, Santos-Cordova MDL, Soto-Cruz A et al (2008) Development of a bioremediation process by biostimulation of native microbial consortium through the heap leaching technique. J Environ Manage 88:115–119Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Savolinen V, Williamson EM et al (2012) Phylogenies reveal predictive power of traditional medicine in bioprospecting. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 109:15835–15840Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Selvin J, Ninawe AS, Kiran GS, Lipton AP (2010) Sponge-microbial interactions: ecological implications and bioprospecting avenues. Crit Rev Microbiol 36:82–90Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Sharma S, Sundaram CS, Luthra PM, Singh Y et al (2006) Role of proteins in resistance mechanism of Pseudomonas fluorescens against heavy metal induced stress with proteomics approach. J Biotechnol 126:374–382Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Shirdam R, Zand AD, Bidhendi GN, Mehrdadi N (2008) Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils with emphasis on the effect of petroleum hydrocarbons on the growth of plant species. Phytoprotection 89:21–29Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Sasmaz A, Sasmaz M (2009) The phytoremediation potential for strontium of indigenous plants growing in a mining area. Environ Exp Bot 67:139–144Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Silva IS, Santos EDCD, Menezes CRD et al (2009) Bioremediation of a polyaromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soil by native soil microbiota and bioaugmentation with isolated microbial consortia. Bioresour Technol 100:4669–4675Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Su-Qin C, Shan C, Liu DB, Xia HM (2006) An extracellular poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) depolymerase from Penicillium sp.DS9713a-01. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:729–735Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Sizmur T, Palumbo-Roe B, Watts MJ, Hodson ME (2011) Impact of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (L.) on As, Cu, Pb and Zn mobility and speciation in contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:742–748Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Smith VH, Graham DW, Cleland DD (1998) Application of resource ratio theory to hydrocarbon biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 32:3386–3395Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Smith WL, Wheeler WC (2006) Venom evolution widespread in fishes: a phylogenetic road map for the bioprospecting of piscine venoms. J Heredity 97:206–217Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Solevic T, Novakovik M, Ilic M, Antic M, Vrvic MM, Jovancicevic B (2011) Investigation of the bioremediation potential of aerobic zymogenous microorganisms in soil for crude oil biodegradation. J Serb Chem Soc 76:425–438Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Sprocati AR, Alisi C, Tasso F et al (2012) Effectiveness of a microbial formula, as a bioaugmentation agent, tailored for bioremediation of diesel oil and heavy metal co-contaminated soil. Process Biochem 47:1649–1655Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Sriprapat W, Thiravetyan P (2013) Phytoremediation of BTEX from indoor air by Zamioculcas zamiifolia. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1482Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Stabili L, Schirosi R, Licciano M, Mola E, Giangrande A (2010) Bioremediation of bacteria in aquaculture waste using the polychaete Sabella spallanzanii. New Biotechnol 27:774–781Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Stenuit B, Eyers L, Schular L, George I, Agathos SN (2009) Molecular tools for monitoring and validating bioremediation. In: Singh A et al (eds) Advances in applied bioremediation, soil biology, vol 17. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 339–353Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Sun GD, Xu Y, Jin JH, Zhong PZ, Liu Y, Luo M, Liu ZP (2012) Pilot scale ex-situ bioremediation of heavily PAHs-contaminated soil by indigenous microorganisms and bioaugmentation by a PAHs-degrading and bioemulsifier-producing strain. J Hazard Mater 233–234:72–78Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Sun H, Li J, Wang C, Wang L, Wang Y (2011) Enhanced microbial removal of pyrene in soils in the presence of earthworms. Soil Sediment Contamin 20:617–630Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Sun H, Wang Z, Gao P, Liu P (2013) Selection of aquatic plants for phytoremediation of heavy metal in electroplate wastewater. Acta Physiol Plant 35:355–364Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Sun Y, Zhou Q, Xu Y, Wang L, Liang X (2011) Phytoremediation for co-contaminated soils of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and heavy metals using ornamental plant Tagetes patula. J Hazard Mater 186:2075–2082Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Suthar S (2008) Bioremediation of aerobically treated distillery sludge mixed with cow dung by using an epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environmentalist 28:76–84Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Suthar S (2012) Vermistabilization of wastewater sludge from milk processing industry. Ecol Eng 47:115–119Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Suthersan SS (ed) (1999) In situ bioremediation. Remediation engineering: design concepts. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Thavamani P, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2012) Bioremediation of high molecular weight polyaromatic hydrocarbons co-contaminated with metals in liquid and soil slurries by metal tolerant PAHs degrading bacterial consortium. Biodegradation 23:823–835Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Tang J, Feng T, Cui C, Feng Y (2013) Simultaneous biodegradation of phenanthrene and oxidation of arsenite by a dual-functional bacterial consortium. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 82:173–179Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Urgun-Demirtas M, Stark B, Pagilla K (2006) Use of genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) for the bioremediation of contaminants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 26:145–164Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Vargas-Garcia MDC, Lopez MJ, Suarez-Estrella F, Moreno J (2012) Compost as a source of microbial isolates for the bioremediation of heavy metals: in vitro selection. Sci Total Environ 431:62–67Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Virdis B, Robaey K, Yuan Z, Keller J (2008) Microbial fuel cells for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal. Water Res 42:3013–3024Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Wang X, Wu N, Guo J, Chu X, Tian J, Yao B, Fan Y (2008) Phytodegradation of organophosphorus compounds by transgenic plants expressing a bacterial organophosphorus hydrolase. Biochemi Biophysi Res Comm 365:453–458Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Wolicka D, Suszek A, Borkowski A, Bielecka A (2009) Application of aerobic microorganisms in bioremediation in situ of soil contaminated by petroleum products. Bioresour Technol 100:3221–3227Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Wood TK (2008) Molecular approaches in bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:572–578Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Xavier JB (2011) Social interaction in synthetic and natural microbial communities. Mol Syst Biol 7:483Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Yamane K (1988) Introduction of experiments in genetic engineering. IX. Expression and regulation of cloned genes in microorganisms. Radioisotopes 37:423–433Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Zamora-Castro J, Paniagua-Michel J, Lezama-Cervantes C (2008) A novel approach for bioremediation of a coastal marine wastewater effluent based on artificial microbial mats. Mar Biotechnol 10:181–189Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Zand AD, Bidhendi GN, Mehrdadi N (2010) Phytoremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) using plant species in Iran. Turk J Agric For 34:429–438Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Zehnsdorf A, Seidel H, Hoffmann P, Schlenker U, Muller RA (2013) Conditioning of sediment polluted with heavy metals using plants as a preliminary stage of the bioremediation process: a large-scale study. J Soils Sediments 13:1106–1112Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Zhang G, Zhang H, Zhang C, Zhnag G, Yang F, Yuan G, Gao F (2013) Simultaneous nitrogen and carbon removal in a single chamber microbial fuel cell with a rotating biocathode. Process Biochem 48:893–900Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Zhang X, Zhao FJ, Huang Q, William PN, Sun GX, Zhu YG (2009) Arsenic uptake and speciation in the rootless duckweed Wolffia globosa. New Phytol 182:421–428Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Zhao B, Poh CL (2008) Insights into environmental bioremediation by microorganisms through functional genomics and proteomics. Proteomics 8:874–881Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Zhao B, Yeo CC, Poh CL (2005) Proteome investigation of the global regulatory role of sigma 54 in response to gentisate induction in Pseudomonas alcaligenes NCIMB 9867. Proteomics 5:1868–1876Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Zhao B, Yeo CC, Tan CL, Poh CL (2007) Proteome analysis of heat shock protein expression in Pseudomonas alcaligenes NCIMB 9867 in response to gentisate exposure and elevated growth temperature. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:506–514Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Zhou J, Qin F, Su J, Liao JW, Xu HL (2011) Purification of formaldehyde-polluted air by indoor plants of Araceae, Agavaceae and Liliaceae. J Food Agri Environ 9:1012–1018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Bioengineering, School of Chemical and Biomedical EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations