Advertisement

e-Signatures for Delivery in e-Government

  • Peter Reichstädter
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2739)

Abstract

Delivery of documents is an elementary process in public administrations. For e- Government, electronic delivery is a central process, complementary to the electronic input process of form data. In the following article, the Austrian model is introduced, the characteristics of which are openness, security and simplicity. Electronic delivery takes place in the form of a deposit and is accompanied by a notification. By using electronic signatures we can solve the problems of signing the deliverables, receiver authentication and confirmation of delivery.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allgemeines Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, BGBl.Nr. 51/1991, i.d.F. BGBl. I Nr. 137/2001 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asokan, N.: Fairness in electronic commerce. Ph. D. thesis, University of Waterloo (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asokan, N., Shoup, V., Waidner, M.: Asynchronous protocols for optimistic fair exchange., Research Report RZ 2976 (#93022), IBM Research (November 1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bundesgesetz vom 1, über die Zustellung behördlicher Schriftstücke (Zustellgesetz) StF: BGBl. Nr. 200/1982, i.d.F. BGBl. I Nr. 65/2002 (April 1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bundesgesetz über elektronische Signaturen (Signaturgesetz – SigG), BGBl. I Nr. 190/1999, BGBl. I Nr. 137/2000, BGBl. I Nr. 32/2001Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Central Population Register, http://www.bmi.gv.at/zmr
  7. 7.
    Gartner, F.C., Pagnia, H., Vogt, H.: Approaching a formal definition of fairness in electronic commerce. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Electronic Commerce (WELCOM 1999), Lausanne, Switzerland (October 1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollosi, A.: Sicherheit der Verfahrenskennung (November 2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollosi, A.: Algorithmus zur Berechnung der verfahrensspezifischen Personenkennzeichnung (February 2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollosi, A., Karlinger, G., Posch, R.: Security-Layer zur Bürgerkarte (November 2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, P., Ning, P., Jajodia, S.: Avoiding Loss of Fairness Owing to Process Crashes in Fair Data Exchange Protocols. Decision Support Systems 31(3), 337–350 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pagnia, H., Gärtner, F.C.: On the impossibility of fair exchange without a trusted third party, Technical Report, TUD-BS-1999-02, Darmstadt, Germany (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Posch, R., et al.: Weißbuch Bürgerkarte, Stand (Mai 2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reichstädter, P., Hollosi, A.: XML-Spezifikation der Personendaten-Struktur, Version 1.0.1 (April 2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shmatikov, V., Mitchell, J.: Analysis of abuse-free contract signing. In: Financial Cryptography 2000 (Anguilla 2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verordnung des Bundeskanzlers über elektronische Signaturen (Signaturverordnung – SigV), StF: BGBl. II Nr. 30/2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Reichstädter
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Chancellery of the Austrian RepublicStaff Unit for ICT-StrategyWienAustria

Personalised recommendations