Advertisement

Trust in e-Government: Digital Signatures without Time Stamping?

  • Mitja Dečman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2739)

Abstract

The successful delivery of electronic services is a primary objective of modern e-government and their successful introduction depends on the users trusting these services and the privacy of their personal data. Digital signatures are one of the security elements that make these services possible, but they feature some weaknesses – weaknesses that can be surmounted by the use of a digital time stamp. These do not only add a certified time to the data but also make many of other methods that increase security and trust possible. Since digital certificates are widely used in today’s information society, digital signatures should be easy to implement. However, implementation must be studied carefully because abuse can have critical repercussions. Without 100 percent trust from its users, e-government and its services will be unsustainable. Slovenian e-government is in this situation, stranded with good infrastructure and legal bases, but services that are not trusted.

Keywords

Digital Signature Smart Card Time Stamp Legal Basis Certification Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, C., Lloyd, S.: Understanding Public-Key Infrastructure. Macmillan Technical Publishing, Indiana ZDA (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Electronic Commerce and Electronic Signature Act, Official Gazette of Republic of Slovenia, 57/2000 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayer, D., Haber, S., Stornetta, W.S.: Improving the Efficiency and Reliability of Digital Time-Stamping. In: Sequences II: Methods in Communication, Security, and Computer Science, pp. 329–334. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buldas, A., Laud, P., Lipmaa, H., Villemson, J.: Time stamping with binary linking schemes. In: Krawczyk, H. (ed.) CRYPTO 1998. LNCS, vol. 1462, pp. 486–501. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maniatis, P., Baker, M.: Enabling the archival storage of signed documents, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, July 24 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benaloh, J., de Mare, M.: Efficient Broadcast time-stamping. Technical report 1, Clarkson University Department of Mathematics and Computer Science (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Community: A European Initiative on Electronic Commerce. COM(97) 157 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Traunmüller, R., Lenk, K. (eds.): EGOV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2456. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tõlge inglise keeled: Eesti Õigustõlke Keskus, Estonian Digital Signatures Act (RT I 2000, 26, 150), Estonian Legal Translation Centre (2000), http://www.riik.ee/riso/digiallkiri/digsignact.rtf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitja Dečman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationUniversity of LjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations