Skip to main content

The Explicit Representability of Implicit Generalizations

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1833))

Abstract

In [9], implicit generalizations over some Herbrand universe H were introduced as constructs of the form I = t/t 1 ∨. . . ∨t m with the intended meaning that I represents all H-ground instances of t that are not instances of any term t i on the right-hand side. More generally, we can also consider disjunctions \(\mathcal{I} = I_{1} \vee . . . \vee I_n\) of implicit generalizations, where \(\mathcal{I}\) contains all ground terms from H that are contained in at least one of the implicit generalizations I j . Implicit generalizations have applications to many areas of Computer Science. For the actual work, the so-called finite explicit representability problem plays an important role, i.e.: Given a disjunction of implicit generalizations \(\mathcal{I} = I_{1} \vee . . . \vee I_n\), do there exist terms r 1,..., r l , s.t. the ground terms represented by \(\mathcal{I}\) coincide with the union of the H-ground instances of the terms r j ? In this paper, we prove the coNP-completeness of this decision problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Comon, H., Delor, C.: Equational Formulae with Membership Constraints. Journal of Information and Computation 112, 167–216 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Comon, H., Lescanne, P.: Equational Problems and Disunification. Journal of Symbolic Computation 7, 371–425 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernández, M.: Negation Elimination in Empty or Permutative Theories. Journal of Symbolic Computation 26, 97–133 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gottlob, G., Pichler, R.: Working with ARMs: Complexity Results on Atomic Representations of Herbrand Models. In: Proceedings of LICS 1999, pp. 306–315. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kapur, D., Narendran, P., Rosenkrantz, D., Zhang, H.: Sufficient-completeness, ground-reducibility and their complexity. Acta Informatica 28, 311–350 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunen, K.: Answer Sets and Negation as Failure. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, Melbourne, pp. 219–228 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuper, G., McAloon, K., Palem, K., Perry, K.: Effcient Parallel Algorithms for Anti- Unification and Relative Complement. In: Proceedings of LICS 1988, pp. 112–120. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lassez, J.-L., Maher, M., Marriott, K.: Elimination of Negation in Term Algebras. In: Tarlecki, A. (ed.) MFCS 1991. LNCS, vol. 520, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lassez, J.-L., Marriott, K.: Explicit Representation of Terms defined by Counter Examples. Journal of Automated Reasoning 3, 301–317 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Maher, M.: Complete Axiomatizations of the Algebras of Finite, Rational and Infinite Trees. In: Proceedings of LICS 1988, pp. 348–357. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maher, M., Stuckey, P.: On Inductive Inference of Cyclic Structures. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 15(2), 167–208 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Marriott, K.: Finding Explicit Representations for Subsets of the Herbrand Universe, PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martelli, A., Montanari, U.: An efficient unification algorithm. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 4(2), 258–282 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pichler, R.: The Explicit Representability of Implicit Generalizations, full paper, available from the author (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tajine, M.: The negation elimination from syntactic equational formulas is decidable. In: Kirchner, C. (ed.) RTA 1993. LNCS, vol. 690, pp. 316–327. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pichler, R. (2000). The Explicit Representability of Implicit Generalizations. In: Bachmair, L. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1833. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10721975_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10721975_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67778-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44980-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics