Skip to main content

Some Results on the Complexity of Planning with Incomplete Information

  • Conference paper
Recent Advances in AI Planning (ECP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1809))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Planning with incomplete information may mean a number of different things; that certain facts of the initial state are not known, that operators can have random or nondeterministic effects, or that the plans created contain sensing operations and are branching. Study of the complexity of incomplete information planning has so far been concentrated on probabilistic domains, where a number of results have been found. We examine the complexity of planning in nondeterministic propositional domains. This differs from domains involving randomness, which has been well studied, in that for a nondeterministic choice, not even a probability distribution over the possible outcomes is known. The main result of this paper is that the non-branching plan existence problem in unobservable domains with an expressive operator formalism is EXPSPACE-complete. We also discuss several restrictions, which bring the complexity of the problem down to PSPACE-complete, and extensions to the fully and partially observable cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C., Kreinovich, V., Trejo, R.: Computational complexity of planning and approximate planning in presence of incompleteness. In: Proc. 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bylander, T.: Complexity results for planning. In: Proc. 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, G., Pryor, L.: Planning under uncertanity: Some key issues. In: Proc. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Draper, D., Hanks, S., Weld, D.: Probabilistic planning with information gathering and contingent execution. In: Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems: Proc. 2nd International Conference (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erol, K., Nau, D.S., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Complexity, decidability and undecidability results for domain-independent planning: A detailed analysis. Technical Report CS-TR-2797, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldsmith, J., Lusena, C., Mundhenk, M.: The complexity of deterministically observable finite-horizon markov decision processes. Technical Report 268-96, Computer Science Department, University of Kentucky (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, D.S.: A catalog of complexity classes. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. A. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kushmerick, N., Hanks, S., Weld, D.: An algorithm for probabilistic least- commitment planning. In: Proc. 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Littman, M.L.: Probabilistic propositional planning: Representations and complexity. In: Proc. 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papadimitrou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peot, M., Smith, D.: Conditional nonlinear planning. In: Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems: Proc. International Confrence (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Warren, D.H.D.: Generating conditional plans and programs. In: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on AI and Simulation of Behaviour (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weld, D., Anderson, C., Smith, D.: Extending Graphplan to handle uncertainty & sensing actions. In: Proc. 15th National Conference on Artifical Intelligence, AAAI 1998 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weld, D., Smith, D.: Conformant Graphplan. In: Proc. 15th National Conference on Artifical Intelligence, AAAI 1998 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haslum, P., Jonsson, P. (2000). Some Results on the Complexity of Planning with Incomplete Information. In: Biundo, S., Fox, M. (eds) Recent Advances in AI Planning. ECP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1809. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10720246_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10720246_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44657-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics