Implementation Architecture for a National Data Center

  • Steve Ramroop
  • Richard Pascoe
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1580)


In this paper, the authors’ main focus is presenting the implementation architecture of Ramroop and Pascoe’s [9] conceptual model for data integration in a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. The model is briefly discussed and extensions to the model are made. These extensions are also applied to the notation Ramroop and Pascoe [9] used to denote the entire data integration process. The model consists of a  Data Center and  Data Agencies at a national level. Details of the actual processing steps followed within the Data Center is discussed and the general architecture design is described. The implementation of the concept is modular starting with the first service called the Selector Broker. Multiple tools are being considered for further investigation.


Geographic Information System Data Integration User Query Legal Procedure Data Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abel, D.J., Ooi, B.C., Tan, K., Tan, S.H.: Towards Integrated Geographical Information Processing. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 12(4), 353–371 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aronoff, S.: Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective. WDL Publications, Ottawa (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devogele, T., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S.: On Spatial Database Integration. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 12(4), 335–352 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dueker, K.J., Vrana, R.: Systems Integration: A Reason and a Means for Data Sharing. Sharing Geographic Information. In: Onsrud, H.J., Rushton, G. (eds.) Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 149–155 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, B.D., Shelly, E.P., Taylor, M.M., Callahan, S.: The FINDAR Directory System: A Meta-Model for Metadata. In: Medyckyj-Scott, D., Newman, I., Ruggles, C., Walker, D. (eds.) Metadata in the Geosciences, pp. 123–137. Group D Publications Ltd, United Kingdom (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laurini, R.: Spatial Multi-Database Topological Continuity and Indexing: A Step Towards Seamless GIS Data Interoperability. International Journal for Geographic Information Systems 12(4), 373–402 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pascoe, R.T.: Data Sharing Using X.500 Directory. In: First International Conference on Geoprocessing. Spatial Information Research Center (SIRC), pp. 689–698. University of Otago, New Zealand (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peel, R.: Unifying Spatial Information. Mapping Awareness 10(8), 28–30 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramroop, S., Pascoe, R.T.: Notation for National Integration of Geographic Data. In: Firns, P. (ed.) 10th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre. Spatial Information Research Center (SIRC), pp. 279–288. University of Otago, New Zealand (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Ramroop
    • 1
  • Richard Pascoe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations