Skip to main content

Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users’ Guide

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation (MABS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1534))

Abstract

In many domains, agent-based system modeling competes with equation-based approaches that identify system variables and evaluate or integrate sets of equations relating these variables. The distinction has been of great interest in a project that applies agent-based modeling to industrial supply networks, since virtually all computer-based modeling of such networks up to this point has used system dynamics, an approach based on ordinary differential equations (ODE’s). This paper summarizes the domain of supply networks and illustrates how they can be modeled both with agents and with equations. It summarizes the similarities and differences of these two classes of models, and develops criteria for selecting one or the other approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AIAG. Manufacturing Assembly Pilot (MAP) Project Final Report. M-4, Automotive Industry Action Group, Southfield, MI (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axtell, R.: Three Distinct Uses of Agent-Based Computational Models in the Social Sciences. Brookings Institution, Washington (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein, M.E., Axtell, R.: Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Ground Up. MIT Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fishwick, P.A.: Simulation Model Design and Execution: Building Digital Worlds. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  6. High Performance Systems. ithink - The Premiere Business Simulation Tool from High Performance Systems, Inc. (1997), http://www.hps-inc.com/products/ithink/ithink.html

  7. Howard, K.R.: Unjamming Traffic with Computers. Scientific American (October 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoy, T.: The Manufacturing Assembly Pilot (MAP): A Breakthrough in Information System Design. EDI Forum 10(1), 26–28 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Judson, O.P.: The Rise of the Individual-Based Model in Ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9(1), 9–14 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagel, R.N., Dove, R.: 21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy. Agility Forum, Bethlehem (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Omohundro, S.: Modelling Cellular Automata with Partial Differential Equations. Physica D 10, 128–134 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Parunak, H.V.D.: DASCh: Dynamic Analysis of Supply Chains (1997), http://www.iti.org/~van/dasch

  13. Parunak, H.V.D., Savit, R., Riolo, R., Clark, S.: Dynamical Analysis of Supply Chains. ERIM/University of Michigan Preprint (1998), To be submitted for publication, Available at http://www.erim.org/cec/projects/dasch.htm

  14. Reif, F.: Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ventana Systems. Ventana Systems Home Page (1997), http://www.vensim.com

  16. Villa, F.: New Computer Architectures as Tools for Ecological Thought. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7(6), 179–183 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Warkentin, M.E.: MRP and JIT: Teaching the Dynamics of Information Flows and Material Flows with System Dynamics Modeling. In: Proceedings of The 1985 International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society. International System Dynamics Society, pp. 1017–1028 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, W.G.: Resolving Discrepancies between Deterministic Population Models and Individual-Based Simulations. American Naturalist 151(2), 116–134 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Dyke Parunak, H., Savit, R., Riolo, R.L. (1998). Agent-Based Modeling vs. Equation-Based Modeling: A Case Study and Users’ Guide. In: Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. MABS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10692956_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10692956_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65476-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49246-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics