Skip to main content

Minimal Access Surgery in the Management of Genuine Stress Incontinence

  • Chapter
Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
  • 519 Accesses

Abstract

Genuine stress incontinence (GSI) is a common condition in women. Prevalence studies underestimate the magnitude of the problem, but typically the rates are said to be between 10% and 20% of women, regardless of age [1]. The treatment options for GSI are discussed in detail elsewhere in this volume, but can basically be divided into conservative therapies (Kegel exercises, hormone replacement, biofeedback and α-agonists), periurethral injections and surgical treatments. Surgical procedures, reported since 1906, were either vaginal repairs as advocated by Kelly and Kennedy or urethral sling procedures, as pioneered by Goebel [2]. In the 1940s, Marshall and Marchetti [3] developed a retropubic approach that was later modified by Burch in 1961 [4]. More recently, an alternative theory on pelvic relaxation [5] has led to the surgical repair of defects in the pubo-cervical fascia (paravaginal repair) in the treatment of vaginal prolapse and GSI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mohide EA. The prevalence and scope of urinary incontinence. Clin Geriatr Med 1986;2(4):639–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohorn EI. The surgery of stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1989;16(4):841–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall VF, Marchetti AA, Krantz KE. The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesicourethral suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1949;88:509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burch JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocoele and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;81:281.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson AC, Lyons JB, Williams NL. A new look at pelvic relaxation. Am J Obstet Gyneco7l 1976;126:568.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jarvis GJ. Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;101:397

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergman A, Ballard CA, Koonings PP. Comparison of three different surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: Prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160(5):1102–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA. Primary stress urinary incontinence and pelvic relaxation: Prospective randomized comparison of three different operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161(1):97–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vancaille TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. J Laparoendoscop Surg 1991;3:169–73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Theobald P, Guillaumin D, Levy G. Laparoscopic preperitoneal colposuspension for stress incontinence in women. Technique and results of 37 procedures. Surg Endosc 1995;9(11):1189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ou C-S, Presthus J, Beadle E. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension using hernia mesh and surgical staples. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3:563–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kung RC, Lie K, Lee P et al. The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(4):537–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Polascik TJ, Moore RG, Rosenberg MT et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 1995;45:647–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDougall EM, Klutke CG, Carnell T. Comparison of transvaginal versus laparoscopic bladder neck suspension for stress urinary incontinence. Urology 1995;45:641–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Das S, Palmer JK. Laparoscopic colposuspension. J Urol 1995;154:1119–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burton GA. A randomised comparison of laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1994;13:497–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Galloway NTM, Davies N, Stephenson TP. The complications of colposuspension. Br J Urol 1987;60:122–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eriksen BC, Hagen B, Eik-Nes SH et al. Long-tern effectiveness of the Burch colposuspension. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1990;69:45–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton S. Burch colposuspension: a 10–20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:740–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mundy AR. A trial comparing the Stamey bladder neck suspension with colposuspension for the treatment of stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1983;55, 687–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam AM, Jenkins GJ, Hyslop RS. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence: preliminary results. Med J Aust 1995;2;162(1):18–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper MJW, Cario G, Lam A et al. A review of the results in a series of 113 laparoscopic colposuspensions. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;36:44–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross JW. Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91(1):55–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Flax S. The gasless laparoscopic Burch bladder neck suspension: Early experience. J Urol 1996;156:1105–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aslan P, Woo HH. Ureteric injury following laparoscopic colposuspension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:266–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lose G. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1998;168;77:29–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kohli N, Jacobs PA, Sze EH et al. Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: a cost analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90(3):411–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. MacKenzie IZ. Reducing hospital stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:175–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1996;347:989–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gray DT, Thorburn J, Lundorff P et al. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1995;345:1139–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nezhat C, Bess O, Admon D et al. Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:713–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Messina MJ, Garavaglia MM, Walsh RT et al. Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: Cost analysis and review of initial experience in a community hospital. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1995;95:31–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993;165:466–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fisher KS, Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Cost analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:77–81..

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL et al. Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. A prospective, randomised comparison. Ann Surg 1995;222:256–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Korram MM. Laparoscopic colposuspension operation. J Gynecol Surg 1995;10:205–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Morgan JE. A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for the treatment of recurrent stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:369–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kung R, Lie KI, Morgan JE et al. Laparoscopic Two-team sling for Urinary Stress Incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(4, Supplement):S23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kreder KJ, Winfield HN. Laparoscopic urethral sling for the treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Endourol 1996;10(3):255–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Blander DS, Carpiniello VL, Harryhill JF et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethropexy with Marlex mesh. Urology 1999;53(5):985–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pelosi MA 3rd, Pelosi MA. Laparoscopically-assisted pubo-vaginal sling procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(4):593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57(3):357–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson AC, Saye WB, Miklos JR. Repairing paravaginal defects laparoscopically. Contemp Obstet Gynecol 1997;42:130.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miklos JR, Kohli N. “Paravaginal Plus” Burch Procedure. A laparoscopic approach. J Pelvic Surg 1998;4(6):297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ross JW. Laparoscopic Burch repair compared to laparoscopic Burch for cure of urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1995;6:323–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Saidi MH, Sadler RK, Saidi JA. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension for genuine urinary stress incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5(3):247–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pelosi MA, Papasakelariou C, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic colposuspension with a transvaginal illuminator. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5(2):179–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Foote AJ, Lam A. Laparoscopic colposuspension in women with previously failed anti-incontinence surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997;23(3):313–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Papasakelariou C, Papasakelariou B. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997;4(2):185–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Shea RT, Seman E, Taylor J. Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension for Urinary Stress Incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(4, Supplement):S36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Radomski SB, Herschorn S. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension: Early results. J Urol 1996;155:515–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lobel PW, Sand PK. Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1996;15:398–9.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Langebrekke A, Dahlstrom B, Eraker R et al. The laparoscopic Burch procedure. A preliminary report. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995;74(2):153–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu CY. Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). A review of 58 cases. J Reprod Med 1993;38(7):526–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu CY, Peak W. Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch Procedure). J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1993;1:31–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, K.M., Kung, R.C. (2003). Minimal Access Surgery in the Management of Genuine Stress Incontinence. In: Drutz, H.P., Herschorn, S., Diamant, N.E. (eds) Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-238-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-238-1_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-238-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics