Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Decision Engineering ((DECENGIN))

Abstract

This chapter traces the impact of decision support methods, including those based on Artificial Intelligence concepts, from the beginning, through to the present, and concludes with proposals for the future of the profession. Most of the readers of this book are engaged in the creation of models, systems, data and knowledge bases and methodologies. These are all worthwhile tasks, and some of them are seriously complicated and tricky to do. Our goal in this chapter is to encourage colleagues to move up a gear. Since the start in 1965, members of our profession have solved several thousand problems for organizations. The next job is to tackle more worldclass issues. We have the skills and the tools to do this. The executives we work with are more computer aware than they were in the 1960s. We ourselves know more about the need for social acceptance than before. The chapter pencils in the history of the DSS concept from the start, then reviews the problems we are collectively tackling now, before moving on to consider the global scale of the challenges that lie ahead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam F, Pomerol JC (1998) Context sensitive Decision Analysis based on the investigation of organisational information networks, Context Sensitive Decision Support Systems, Berkeley, Dina, Widmeyer, George, Brezillon, Patrick and Rajkovic, Vlado (Eds.), Chapman Hall, London, U.K., pp 122–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminate analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance 23: 589–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASIMO. http://asimo.honda.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Ba S, Whinston AB, Zhang H (2003) Building trust in online auction markets through an economic incentive mechanism. Decision Support Systems, 35: 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker T, Murthy N, Vaidyanthan J (2004) Service package switching in hotel revenue management systems. Decision Sciences, 33(1): 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Basnet C, Foulds L, Igbaria M (1996) Fleetmanager: a microcomputer based DSS for vehicle routing. Decision Support Systems, 16: 195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver W (1996) Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research. Supp: 71–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I, Todd P (1996) Effects of decision support and task contingencies on model formulation; a cognitive perspective. of Decision Support Systems 17: 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berztiss A (1996) A software process for management software systems, Implementing Systems for Supporting Management Decisions, Humphreys, Patrick, Bannon, Liam, McCosh, Andrew M., Migliarese, Piero and Pomerol, Jean Charles (Eds.), Chapman & Hall, London, U.K. pp 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brezillon P, Pomerol JC (2004). Using contextual information in decision-making, Context Sensitive Decision Support Systems, Berkeley, Dina, Widmeyer, George, Brezillon, Patrick and Rajkovic, Vlado (Eds.), pp 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson S, Leidner DE (2004) Contextual design of management support systems. In, Context Sensitive Decision Support Systems, Berkeley, Dina, Widmeyer, George, Brezillon, Patrick and Rajkovics, Vlado (Eds.), Chapman & Hall, London, U.K. pp 88–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Castarella JR, Lewis BL, Walker PL (2000) Modeling the audit opinions issued to bankrupt companies: a two-stage empirical analysis. Decision Sciences, 31(2): 507–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Schroeder J, Hauck RV, Ridgeway L, Atabakhsh H, Gupta H, Boarman C, Rasmussen K, Clements AW (2003) COPLINK Connect: information and knowledge management for law enforcement. Decision Support Systems 34(3): 271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin J, Begeman ML (1997) gIBIS: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A. pp 247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Vinci. http:// http://www.davinciprostatectomy.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling KL, St. Louis RD (2000). Asynchronous implementation of the nominal group technique: is it effective? Decision Support Systems 29(3): 229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EndoVia. http://www.mos.org/cst/article/5403/

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics, Productivity Press. Cambridge, MA. U.S.A. pp 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes J (2003) EDGAR-Analyser: automating the analysis of corporate data contained in the SEC’s EDGAR database. Decision Support Systems 35: 7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh D, Ray MR (1997) Risk, Ambiguity, and decision choice; some additional evidence. Decision Sciences 28(1): 81–91

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grabot B, Blanc JC, Binda C (2004) A decision support system for production activity control. Decision Support Systems 16: 87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley JL, Greer BM, S Park (2002) Chrysler leverages its suppliers’ improvement suggestions. Interfaces 32(4): 20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A, Shah S, Dixon D (2003) Data mining based decision-making approach for predicting survival kidney dialysis patients. In DD Feng and ER Carson (Eds.), Modeling and Control on Biomedical Systems 2003, Proceedings of the IFAC 2003 Symposium on Modeling and Control of Biomedical Systems, Melbourne, Australia, Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 2003, pp. 35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J (1991) A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development. European Journal of Information Systems 1(4): 249–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain BA, Nag BN (1996) Artificial Neural network models for pricing initial public offerings. Decision Sciences 26(3): 283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • James A, Thompson SH (2000) Management issues in data warehousing: insights from the housing and development board. Decision Support Systems 29(1): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez A, Sixto R, Mateos A (2003) Decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments. Decision Support Systems, 36(1): 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai SK (2001) An empirical study of equivalence judgements vs ratio judgements in decision analysis. Decision Sciences, 32(2): 277–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley P, Simon HA (1995) Applications of machine learning and rule induction. Communications of the ACM, 38(11): 55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larichev OI, Andreyeva EN, Sternin MY (1996) System for preparing management decisions:-a gas pipeline siting study. In, Implementing Systems for Supporting Management Decisions, Humphreys, Patrick, Bannon, Liam, McCosh, Andrew M., Migliarese, Piero and Pomerol, Jean Charles (Eds.) Chapman Hall, 1, London, U.K. pp 249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder D (1994) Understanding Social Theory, Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Olivia R, Wei CP, Hu PJ, Chang N (2000). Automated learning of patient image retrieval knowledge: neural networks versus inductive decision trees. Decision Support Systems 30(2): 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangiameli P, West D, Rampal R (2004). Model selection for medical diagnosis decision support systems. Decision Support Systems 36(3): 247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J (1984) Some Expert Systems need common sense. Stanford University 1984. (www.stanford.edu)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosh AM, Scott Morton MS (1968) Terminal costing for better decisions. Harvard Business Review 46(3): 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosh AM, Hawkins DF, Lampe JC (1969) Time-shared mergers and acquisitions. Mergers and Acquisitions 4(1): 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min D, Moonkee K, Jong R, Kim WC, Min D, Ku S (1996) IBRS: Intelligent bank reengineering system. Decision Support Systems 18(1): 97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan GP, Purushothaman P, McLeod RW, Nichols WG (2004). DSSALM: A DSS for asset and liability management. Decision Support Systems 33: 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson KM, Kogan A, Srivatava RP, Vasarhelyi MA, Lu H (2000) Virtual auditing agents: the EDGAR agent challenge. Decision Support Systems 28(3): 241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati HR, Steiger DM, Iyer LS, Herschel RT (2002) Knowledge warehouse: an architectural integration of knowledge management, decision support, Artificial Intelligence and data warehousing. Decision Support Systems 33(2): 143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan C, Sethi V (2002) Rationality in strategic information technology decisions: impactg of shared domain knowledge and IT unit structure. Decision Sciences, 33(1): 59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Cinca C (1996) Self organising neural networks for financial diagnosis. Decision Support Systems 17: 227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Morton MS (1971) Management Decision Systems:-Computer-based Support for Decision-making. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA, pp 1–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, KP (1993) Machine learning for intelligent support of conflict resolution. Decision Support Systems 10(2): 121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabucanon MT, Kovavisaruch L, Malaivongs K (1995) Microcomputer based heuristic approach to vehicle routing for after-sales servicing. Decision Support Systems 13: 195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. March 6, 2004, pp. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippi RR, Turban E (1990) Auto learning approaches for building expert systems. Computers and Operations Research 17: 553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani J (1997) SoftCord: an intelligent agent for coordination in software development projects. Decision Support Systems 20(1): 65–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Walker D (1998) Supply chain collaboration saves Chrysler $2.5 billion and counting. Automatic I.D News, (August) pp. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner BJ, Davis DJ (2001) Discrete sequential search with group activities. Decision Sciences 32(4): pp. 557–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Mou W (1993) An integrated decision support system in a Chinese chemical plant. Interfaces 23(6): 93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleznikow J, Nolan JR (2001) Using soft computing to build real world intelligent decision support systems in uncertain domains. Decision Support Systems 31(2): 263–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu D, Premkumar G, Zhang X, Chu, CH (2001) Data Mining for Network Intrusion Detection. A comparison of alternative methods. Decision Sciences, 32(4): 635–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCosh, A.M., Correa-PĂ©rez, B.A. (2006). The Optimization of What?. In: Intelligent Decision-making Support Systems. Decision Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-231-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-231-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-228-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-231-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics