Advances in Design pp 87-96

Part of the Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing book series (SSAM) | Cite as

Structural and Functional Analysis for Assemblies

  • Hugo Falgarone
  • Nicolas Chevassus

Abstract

This article presents a systemic method for designing assemblies. It is based on generic concepts such as modeling of assemblies using assembly nested graphs which reflect the product design breakdown, the interfaces between components. The proposed method enables to assess the product producibility and the robustness of the assembly process. It eases impact analysis following changes of modified product functions or features.

A software tool, called GAIA, has been developed to support this method; based on a user-friendly interface. It enables specifying assemblies through interfaces and performing a functional and structural analysis of assemblies. Interoperable with the Digital Mock-up and Product Management Systems, it speeds up design changes and impact analysis. Finally, it is useful to grasp the design intents and to capitalize and reuse this design knowledge.

The adoption of this advanced modeling technique in support of the engineering assembly process improves the quality of designed products and reduces the cost of change management, customization and fault rectification by solving assembly issues at the design stage.

Keywords

Assembly modeling Design through interfaces Assembly process analysis Change management Systems engineering Structural and Functional Analysis Computer Aided Design Process Aided Design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7.7 References

  1. [1]
    Mantripragada, R., Whitney, D.E., 1998, “The Datum Flow Chain: A Systemic Approach to Assembly Design and Modeling,” Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 10, pp. 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ballu, A., Mathieu, L., 1999, “Choice Of Functional Specifications Using Graphs Within The Framework Of Education,” Proceedings of the 6thCIRP Computer Aided Tolerancing Seminar.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Sellakh, R., Riviere, A., Chevassus, N., Marguet, B., 2001, “An Assisted Method For Specifying ISO Tolerances Applied To Structural Assemblies,” Proceedings of the 7thCIRP Computer Aided Tolerancing Seminar.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sheard, S., et al., 2002, “Systems Engineering Beyond Capability Models,” Proceedings of INCOSE, August 2002.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    “Feature Based Assembly Modeling, FEAST,” Synthesis Report, Contract BRE2-CT94-1015, Project funded by the European Community under the Brite/Euram programme, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Riviere, A., Feru, F., Tollenaere, M., 2003, “Controlling Product Related Engineering Changes In The Aircraft Industry,” IDEC 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Falgarone
    • 1
  • Nicolas Chevassus
    • 1
  1. 1.Corporate Research CenterEuropean Aeronautic Defence and Space Company Corporate Research Centre (EADS CCR)Suresnes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations