Skip to main content

Pitfalls of Engineering Change

Change Practice during Complex Product Design

  • Chapter
Advances in Design

Abstract

The majority of design projects involve adapting a known solution to meet new requirements. Therefore, understanding the issue of engineering change is of vital importance if companies are to deliver product development projects on time and to budget. When a change is made to part of a product, the change is likely to propagate to affect other components or systems. This paper examines the engineering change process within a UK engineering firm and focuses on the issue of change propagation. The findings are compared with an earlier study in the aerospace industry. Four reasons why propagation occurs are proposed and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

34.8 References

  1. Nichols, K., 1990, “Getting Engineering Changes Under Control”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 1(1), pp. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, K.B., and Fujimoto, T., 1991, “Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fricke, E., Gebhard, B., Negele, H., and Igenbergs, E., 2000, “Coping with Changes: Causes, Findings and Strategies,” Systems Engineering, Vol. 3(4), pp. 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Terwiesch, C., and Loch, C.H., 1999, “Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16(2), pp. 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright, I.C., 1997, “A Review of Research into Engineering Change Management: Implications for Product Design,” Design Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, G.Q., and Mak, K.L., 1999, “Current Practices of Engineering Change Management in UK Manufacturing Industries,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19(1), pp. 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J., and Zanker, W., 2004, “Change and Customisation in Complex Engineering Domains,” Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 15(1).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, G.Q., Yee, W.Y., and Mak, K.L., 2003, “Current Practice of Engineering Change Management in Hong Kong Manufacturing Industries,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 139(1/3), pp. 481–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pikosz, P., and Malmqvist, J., 1998, “A Comparative Study of Engineering Change Management in Three Swedish Engineering Companies,” Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leech, D.J., and Turner, B.T., 1985, Engineering Design for Profit, Chichester, Ellis Horwood Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dale, B.G., 1982, “The Management of Engineering Change Procedure,” Engineering Management International, Vol. 1(3), pp. 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rivière, A., Dacunha, C., and Tollenaere, M., 2002, “Performances in Engineering Change Management,” Proc. of 4 th International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, Clermont-Ferrand, France, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maull, R., Hughes, D., and Bennett, J., 1992, “The role of the bill-of-materials as a CAD/CAPM interface and the key importance of engineering change control,” Computing and Control Engineering Journal, Vol. 3(2), pp. 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarratt, T.A.W., Eckert, C.M., Weeks, R., and Clarkson, P.J., 2003, “Environmental Legislation as a Driver of Design,” Proceedings of 14 th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden, CDROM.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jarratt, T.A.W., Eckert, C.M., and Clarkson, P.J., 2004, “Development of a Product model to Support Engineering Change Management,” Proceedings of the TMCE 2004, Lausanne, Switzerland, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jarratt, T., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J. (2006). Pitfalls of Engineering Change. In: ElMaraghy, H.A., ElMaraghy, W.H. (eds) Advances in Design. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-210-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-210-1_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-004-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-210-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics