Advertisement

State of the Art and Development Trends

Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Keywords

Support Vector Machine Particle Swarm Optimization Cluster Centre Fuzzy Cluster Time Series Forecast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Auflauf J and Biehl (1989) The Adatron: An adaptive perceptron algorithm Europhysics Letters 10(7):687–692.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Babuska (1996) Fuzzy modelling and identification, Ph.D Thesis, Control Laboratory, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Babuska R, Van der Veen PJ, and Kaymak, U (2002) Improved Covariance Estimation for Gustafson-Kessel Clustering, FUZZ-IEEE 2002, vol. 2: 1081–1085.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bezdek JC (1974) Cluster validity with fuzzy sets. J. Cybernet.: 58–71.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bezdek JC, Tsao EC, and Pal NR (1992) Fuzzy Kohonen Clustering Networks. Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Fuzzy System: 1035–1043.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Burges CJC (1998) A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Preprint: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cao L (2003) Support vector machines experts for time series forecasting, Neurocomputing, 51:321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cao L and Tay EHF (2001) Financial Forecasting Using Support Vector Machines. Neural Computation & Application. 10:184–192.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chen J, Li Huai, Sun K, and Kim B (2003) How will Bioinformatics impact signal processing research. IEEE Signal Processing Maga. 20(6): 16–26.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chen Z, Feng TJ, and Meng QC (1999) The Application of wavelet neural network in time series prediction and system modelling based on multi-resolution learning.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chiu SL (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation: J. Intell. Fuzzy Systems: 2: 267–278.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Cover TM (1965) Geometrical and statistical properties of systems of linear inequalities with applications in pattern recognition, IEEE Trans. on Electronic Computers, vol. 14: 326–324.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superposition of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, signals and systems 2:303–314.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Duch W, Setiono R, and Zurada JM (2004) Computational Intelligence Methods, for Rule-Based Data Understanding. Proc. of the IEEE 92(5): 771–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Fast JD (1962) Entropy: the significance of the concept of entropy and it’s applications in science and technology. In: The statistical significance of the entropy concept, Philips Technical Library, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Haykin S (1999) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation.2nd Edition. Prentice Hall International, Inc., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    He Z, Wei C, Yang L, Gao X, Yao S, Eberhart R, and Shi Y (1998) Extracting rules from fuzzy neural networks by particle swarm optimization. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, and White H (1990) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2: 359–366.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hu X and Eberhart RC (2002a) Solving constrained nonlinear optimization problems with particle swarm optimization. 6th World Multiconference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2002), Orlando, USA.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hu X and Eberhart RC (2002b) Multiobjective optimization using dynamic neighbourhood particle swarm optimisation. Proc. of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, Hawai, May 12-17, 2002.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Huntsberger T and Ajjimaransee P (1989) Parallel self organizing feature maps for unsupervised pattern recognition, Intl. Journal of General systems, 16: 357–372.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    IEEE: Special Issues on Wavelets: Trans. on Information Theory (March 1992), Trans. on Signal Processing (December 1993), and Proceedings of the IEEE (April 1996).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    IEEE: IEEE Control Systems Magazine, August 2004Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kazadi S (2000) Swarm Engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kennedy J and Eberhart RC (1995) Particle Swarm Optimization. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Neural Networks, vol. 4: 1942–1948.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Klir GJ and Folger TA (1988). Fuzzy sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice Hall International Editions.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Kohonen T (1982) Self-organizing function in neural computing. Applied optics, 26: 4910–4918.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Li ST and Chen SC (2002) Functional Approximation using Robust Networks. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’02)Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Li X, Tso SK, and Wang J (2000) Real-Time Tool Condition Monitoring Using Wavelet Transforms in Fuzzy techniques. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Pt. C 30(3): 352–357.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Lotric U (2000) Using Wavelet Analysis and Neural Networks for Time Series Prediction, PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Medasni S, Kim J, and Krishnapuram R (1995) Estimation of membership functions for pattern recognition and computer vision. In: Fuzzy Logic and it’s application to engineering. Information Sciences and Intelligent systems, Kluwer Academic publishers, Dodrecht: 45–54.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Mertz J and Murphy PM (2003) UCI respiratory of machine databases. (visit: http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/machine-learning-data-bases)Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Morita M (1993) Associative memory with nonmonotone dynamics. Neural Networks 6: 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Mukherjee S and Nayar S (1996) Automatic Generation RBF Networks Using Wavelets. Patter Recognition 29(8):13691383.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Mukherjee S, Osuna E, and Girosi F (1997) Nonlinear Prediction of Chaotic Time Series Using Support Vector Machines. Proc. of IEEE NNSP’ 97, Amelia Island, Fl, 24-26 Sept.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Muller KR, Smola JA, Ratsch G, Scholkopf B, Kohlmorgen J, and Vapnik VN (1997) Predicting time series with support vector machines. Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN’97):999–1004. Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Nason GP and Sachs R (1999) Wavelets in time series analysis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. A: 1–16.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Pati YC and Krishnaprasad PS (1993) Analysis and Synthesis of Feedforward Neural Networks Using Discrete Affine Wavelet Transformations. IEE Trans. on Neural Networks 4(1): 73–85.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Principe JC, Euliano NR, and Lefebvre WC (1999) Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals through Simulations. Wiley, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Rao SS and Kumthekar B. (1994) Recurrent Neural Networks. 0-7803-1901-x/94 IEEE 1994:3143–3147.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Rioul O and Vetterli M (1991) Wavelets in Signal Processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine: 14–38.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Setiono R (2000) Generating concise and accurate classification rules for breast cancer diagnosis. Artificial Intell. Med. vol. 18: 205–219.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Setnes M (2000) Supervised fuzzy clustering for rule extraction, IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 8(4): 416–424.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    Setnes M and Kaymak U (1998) Extended fuzzy c-means with volume prototypes and cluster merging, Proc. of EUFIT, Aachen, Germany, pp. 1360–1364.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Soltani S (2002) On the use of the wavelet decomposition for time series prediction. Neurocomputing 48: 267–277.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Takeshi I and Akifumi T (1999) Modularity and Hierarchy in Cerebral Cortex; A Proposal of Fractal Neural Networks. Proc. of 4th Intl. Workshop on Neural Networks in Applications NN’99: 23–29.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Vapnik VN (1992) Principles of risk minimisation for learning theory, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4: 831–838. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Vapnik VN (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Vapnik VN and Chervonenkis AY (1968) On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities, Doklady Akademi Nauk USSR (in Russian)Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Vapnik VN, Golowich SE, and Smola AJ (1996) Support Vector Method for Function Approximation, Regression Estimation, and Signal Processing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9:281–287. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Yager RR, Filev, DP (1994) Generation of fuzzy rules by mountain clustering. J. Intell. Fuzzy Systems 2: 209–219.Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    Yao J, Dash M, Tan ST, and Liu H (2000) Entropy based fuzzy clustering and fuzzy modelling, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113: 381–388. [54]_Yuan B, Klir GJ, and Swan-Stone J.F (1995) Evolutionary fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. FUZZ-IEEE 1995: 2221-2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [55]
    Zang Q (1997) Using wavelet network in nonparametric estimation, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, vol. 8(2): 227–236.Google Scholar
  55. [56]
    Zang Q and Benveniste A (1992) Wavelet Networks, IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks 3(6): 889-898.Google Scholar
  56. [57]
    Zhang BL, Richard C, Jabri MA, Derssch D, and Flower B (2001) Multi-resolution Forecasting for Futures Trading Using wavelet Decompositions. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks. 12(4): 765–774.Google Scholar
  57. [58]
    Zhang J, Walter GG, Miao Y, and Lee WNW (1995) Wavelet Neural Networks for Functional Learning. IEEE Trans. on Signal Process. 43(6):1485–1496.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Personalised recommendations