Skip to main content
  • 500 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses wider engineering lessons that may be drawn from the investigation of a train derailment that occurred on the Northern Line of London Underground on 19 October 2003 at Camden Town. It summarises the accident investigation process followed and the main findings and discusses: the management of “legacy” systems; maintaining the links between design intent and maintenance practice; the concept of insidious criticality; and the use of standards to control interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Payne, K.G. “The Investigation of an underground train derailment”. Dissertation prepared in connection with MSc studies, Lancaster University Engineering Department, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/pressreleases/0402/02.asp

  3. Reason, J. “Human Error”, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G C Simpson, A M Rushworth, F H von Glehn and R H Lomas. “Investigation of the causes of transport and tramming accidents on mines other than coal, gold and platinum”, Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee Report, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See details within London Underground’s Railway safety Case, posted in full athttp://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/about/report/sqe

  6. Ketz, T. “Learning from Accidents”, Third Edition, Gulf Professional Publishing, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boardman, J. “Systems Engineering, An Introduction”, Perntice Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhlmann, R L. “Professional Accident Investigation”, Loss Control Institute, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Successful Health and Safety Management”, HSE Books, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benner Jr, L. “Rating Accident Models and Investigation Methodologies”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 16, pp. 105–126, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/Bieleschweig/B3/#content. website of The Third Bieleschweig Workshop on System Engineering, 12–13 February 2004, Center of Interdiciplinary Research (ZiF), University of Bielefeld.

  12. “The Warwick Explosion; a case study”, Investigation Process Research Roundtable and Library website, http://www.iprr.org/COMPS/WRWENG.html

    Google Scholar 

  13. McClay, R E. “Using the Universal model in Accident Investigation”, Professional Development Conference Proceedings, East Carolina University, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Payne, K. (2005). Learning from a Train Derailment. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Constituents of Modern System-safety Thinking. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-130-X_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-130-X_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-130-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics