Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Health Informatics

  • 2029 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gardner R. CPOE. AMIA Fall Symposium. Los Angeles: AMIA; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tierney W, Miller M, Overhage M. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. JAMA 1993;269:379–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Overhage J. A randomized trial of corollary orders to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Informatics 1997;4:364.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mekhjian H, Rajee R, Kumar P, Kuehn L. Immediate Benefits Realized Following Implementation of Physician Order Entry at an Academic Medical Center. J Am Med Informatics 2002;9:529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving Safety with Information Technology. New Engl J Med 2003;348: 2526–2534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Massaro T. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Academic Medicine 1993;68:20–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Massaro T. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Academic Medicine 1993;68:25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Versel N. Cedars-Sinai goes back to paper orders. Modern Physician online; 2003. www.modernphysician.com/news.cms?newsId=433

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sittig D. Computer-based order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1: 108.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boutis K, LK, Jaramillo D. Sensitivity of a clinical examination to predict need for radiography in children with ankle injuries: a prospective study. Lancet 2001;358:2118–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. Br Med J 2003;326:417.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patel V. Interface Design for Health Care Environments: The Role of Cognitive Science. AMIA Fall Symposium. Orlando, FL: AMIA; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. iHealthBeat. North Carolina hospital scores with CPOE, 2003. http://www.ihealthbeat.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItem&itemID=99060

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmad A, Teater P, Bentley TD. Key Attributes of a Successful Physician Order Entry System Implementation in a Multi-hospital Environment. J Am Med Informatics 2002;9:16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Payne TH, Hoey PJ, Nichol P. Preparation and Use of Pre-Constructed Orders. J Am Med Informatics 2003;10:322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metzger J, Fortin J. CPOE in Community Hospitals. www.chcf.org:FCG; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Payne TH. Order Set Use. Personal Communication; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wachter R, UCSF-Stanford University Evidence-based Practice Center. Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices and Chapter 25. Beta-blockers and Reduction of Perioperative Cardiac Events. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Contract No. 290-97-0013; 2001. Report No.: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, No. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ornstein C. Hospital Heeds Doctors, Suspends Use of Software. Los Angeles: Times; January 22, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald C. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 30 years of learning. AMIA Annual Symposium. Washington, DC; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Overhage J, Sittig D. CDS rules management. Personal communication, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shekelle P, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, et al. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines: How Quickly Do Guidelines Become Outdated? JAMA. 2001;286:1461–1467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Content Matrix in The Decision Support Implementers’ Workbook. www.himss.org/asp/cds-workbook.asp

    Google Scholar 

  24. McKnight LK, Stetson PD, Bakken S, Curran C, Cimino JJ. Perceived Information Needs and Communication Difficulties of Inpatient Physicians and Nurses. J Am Med Informatics 2002;9:S64–S69.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tate KE, Gardner RM, Scherting K. Nurses, pagers, and patient-specific criteria: three keys to improved critical value reporting. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995:164–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poon E, Kuperman G, Fiskio J. Real-Time Notification of Laboratory Data Requested by Users through Alpha-Numeric Pagers. AMIA Fall Symposium. Washington, D.C.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McDonald C, Overhage J, Tierney W. The Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS): Physician use for input and output and Web browser-based computing. AMIA Fall Sumposium. Washington, D.C.; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM. Safe but Sound: Patient Safety Meets Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA 2002;288:508–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:161–167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Case J, Mowry M, Welebob E. The Nursing Shortage—Can Technology Help? First Consulting Group; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Eurlings F, Asten A, Cozijn H. Effects of a nursing information system in 5 Dutch hospitals. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997;46:50–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Oniki TA, Terry P, Clemmer MD, Pryor TA. The Effect of Computer-generated Reminders on Charting Deficiencies in the ICU. J Am Med Informatics 2003;10:177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  33. iHealthBeat. Online system reduces nurse documentation time, 2002. http://www.ihealthbeat.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItem&itemID=98572

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wong DHP, MD; Gallegos, Yvonne RN, MSN; Weinger, Matthew B. Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unit information system. Critical Care Medicine 2003;31:2488–2494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Kuperman GJ. A Consensus Statement on Considerations for a Successful CPOE Implementation. J Am Med Informatics 2003;10:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gill, R.A., Walker, J.M. (2005). Optimizing Inpatient Care. In: Walker, J.M., Bieber, E.J., Richards, F. (eds) Implementing an Electronic Health Record System. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-115-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-115-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-826-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-115-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics