Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloomfield RE, Littlewood B (2003) Confidence in safety claims. CSR, City University http://bscw.cs.ncl.ac.uk/bscw/bscw.cgi/0/43989

    Google Scholar 

  2. CAA (2001) Regulatory Objective for Software Safety Assurance in Air Traffic Service Equipment: SW01. Civil Aviation Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dijkstra EW (1972) Notes on structured programming. In: Dahl O-J, Dijkstra EW, Hoare CAR (eds) Structured Programming. Academic, London New York, pp1–82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eckhardt DE, Lee LD (1985) A Theoretical Basis of Multiversion Software Subject to Coincident Errors. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 11:1511–151

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guiho G, Hennebert C (1990) SACEM software validation. In: Proc 12th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Soc, pp186–191

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henrion M, Fischhoff B (1986) Assessing uncertainty in physical constants Americal J. Physics 54:791–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunns DM, Wainwright N (1991) Software-based protection for Sizewell B: the regulator’s perspective. In: Nuclear Engineering International, September 1991, pp38–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. HSE (1992) Safety Assessment Principles for Nuclear Plants. Health and Safety Executive, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Littlewood B (2000) The use of proofs in diversity arguments. IEEE Trans Software Engineering 26:1022–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Littlewood B, Miller DR (1989) Conceptual Modelling of Coincident Failures in Multi-Version Software. IEEE Trans on Software Engineering 15:1596–1614

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Littlewood B, Popov P, Strigini L (2002) Modelling software design diversity-a review. ACM Computing Surveys 33:177–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Littlewood B, Wright DW (1997) Some conservative stopping rules for the operational testing of safety-critical software. IEEE Trans Software Engineering 23:673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MoD (1997) The Procurement of Safety Critical Software in Defence Equipment: Def-Stan 00-55. Ministry of Defence, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bloomfield, R., Littlewood, B. (2006). On the use of diverse arguments to increase confidence in dependability claims. In: Besnard, D., Gacek, C., Jones, C.B. (eds) Structure for Dependability: Computer-Based Systems from an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-111-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-111-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-110-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-111-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics