Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovations in the Treatment of Faecal Incontinence

  • Chapter
Progress in Colorectal Surgery

  • 533 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:33–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, et al. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002;50:480–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 1995;274:559–561.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Talley NJ, O’Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 1992;102:895–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1905–1911.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sultan AH. Anal incontinence after childbirth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:320–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karoui S, Savoye-Collet C, Koning E, Leroi AM, Denis P. Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173: 389–392.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ. 2002; 166:326–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Norman M, Holmstrom B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:21–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:464–471.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Springen K. The right to choose. Cesarean sections are on the rise again. Publichealth officials want to limit them, but many patients and doctors are resisting. Newsweek 2000;136:73–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Faltin DL, Sangalli MR, Curtin F, Morabia A, Weil A. Prevalence of anal incontinence and other anorectal symptoms in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:117–120; discussion 121.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bytzer P, Talley NJ, Leemon M, Young LJ, Jones MP, Horowitz M. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms associated with diabetes mellitus: a popul-ation-based survey of 15 000 adults. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161:1989–1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Epanomeritakis E, Koutsoumbi P, Tsiaoussis I, et al. Impairment of anorectal function in diabetes mellitus parallels duration of disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1394–1400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinds JP, Eidelman BH, Wald A. Prevalence of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. A population survey. Gastroenterology 1990;98:1538–1542.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rizk DE, Hassan MY, Shaheen H, Cherian JV, Micallef R, Dunn E. The prevalence and determinants of health care-seeking behavior for fecal incontinence in multiparous United Arab Emirates females. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1850–1856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Borrie MJ, Davidson HA. Incontinence in institutions: costs and contributing factors. CMAJ. 1992; 147:322–328.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson R, Furner S, Jesudason V. Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1226–1229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chassagne P, Landrin I, Neveu C, et al. Fecal incontinence in the institutionalized elderly: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. Am J Med. 1999;106:185–190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bliss DZ, Johnson S, Savik K, Clabots CR, Gerding DN. Fecal incontinence in hospitalized patients who are acutely ill. Nurs Res. 2000;49:101–108.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Franz HB, Wendler D, Oettling G. Immunohistochemical assessment of steroid hormone receptors in tissues of the anal canal. Implications for anal incontinence? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:892–895.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Donnelly V, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. The influence of oestrogen replacement on faecal incontinence in postmenopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:311–315.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Delbro D, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L. The effects of atropine or benzilonium on pelvic pouch and anal sphincter functions. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991;26:563–571.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Farrar JT. The effects of drugs on intestinal motility. Clin Gastroenterol. 1982;11:673–681.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Santoro GA, Eitan BZ, Pryde A, Bartolo DC. Open study of low-dose amitriptyline in the treatment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1676–1681; discussion 1681-1682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheetham MJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Topical phenylephrine increases anal canal resting pressure in patients with faecal incontinence. Gut 2001;48:356–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Randomized controlled trial of topical phenylephrine in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2000;87:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RK. Randomized, controlled trial of topical phenylephrine for fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch construction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43: 1059–1063.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Haskell B, Rovner H. Electromyography in the management of the incompetent anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 1967;10:81–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cerulli MA, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM. Progress in biofeedback conditioning for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 1979;76:742–746.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. MacLeod JH. Biofeedback in the management of partial anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983; 26:244–246.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. MacLeod JH. Management of anal incontinence by biofeedback. Gastroenterology 1987;93: 291–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jensen LL, Lowry AC. Biofeedback improves functional outcome after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC, Roberts PL, Murray JJ, Schoetz DJ Jr. Can manometric parameters predict response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:1021–1025.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gilliland R, Heymen S, Altomare DF, Park UC, Vickers D, Wexner SD. Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1123–1126.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Heymen S, Jones KR, Ringel Y, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:728–736.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Miner PB, Donnelly TC, Read NW. Investigation of mode of action of biofeedback in treatment of fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:1291–1298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chiarioni G, Bassotti G, Stanganini S, Vantini I, Whitehead WE, Stegagnini S. Sensory retraining is key to biofeedback therapy for formed stool fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:109–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Heymen S, Pikarsky AJ, Weiss EG, Vickers D, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. A prospective randomized trial comparing four biofeedback techniques for fecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2000;2:88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fynes MM, Marshall K, Cassidy M, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing the effect of augmented biofeedback with sensory biofeedback alone on fecal incontinence after obstetric trauma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:753–758; discussion 758-761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Bleijenberg G. Biofeedback treatment is ineffective in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:992–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiesel PH, Norton C, Roy AJ, Storrie JB, Bowers J, Kamm MA. Gut focused behavioural treatment (biofeedback) for constipation and faecal incontinence in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69: 240–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Leroi AM, Dorival MP, Lecouturier MF, et al. Pudendal neuropathy and severity of incontinence but not presence of an anal sphincter defect may determine the response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:762–769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Guillemot F, Bouche B, Gower-Rousseau C, et al. Biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Long-term clinical results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:393–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rieger NA, Wattchow DA, Sarre RG, et al. Prospective trial of pelvic floor retraining in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:821–826.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Whitehead WE, Burgio KL, Engel BT. Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in geriatric patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:320–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Parks AG, McPartlin JF. Late repair of injuries of the anal sphincter. Proc R Soc Med. 1971; 64:1187–1189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:22–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Tan M, O’Hanlon DM, Cassidy M, O’Connell PR. Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1624–1629.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Fleshman JW, Peters WR, Shemesh EI, Fry RD, Kodner IJ. Anal sphincter reconstruction: anterior overlapping muscle repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:739–743.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg. 1994;84:1231–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Simmang C, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Fleshman JW. Anal sphincter reconstruction in the elderly: does advancing age affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1065–1069.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Young CJ, Mathur MN, Eyers AA, Solomon MJ. Successful overlapping anal sphincter repair: relationship to patient age, neuropathy, and colostomy formation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:344–349.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Buie WD, Lowry AC, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD. Clinical rather than laboratory assessment predicts continence after anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1255–1260.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rasmussen OO, Puggaard L, Christiansen J. Anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma: age affects outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:193–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Giordano P, Renzi A, Efron J, et al. Previous sphincter repair does not affect the outcome of repeat repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:635–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pinedo G, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Roach R, Halligan S, Kamm MA. Results of repeat anal sphincter repair. Br J Surg. 1999;86:66–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Slade MS, Goldberg SM, Schottler JL, Balcos EG, Christenson CE. Sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20:33–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hasegawa H, Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Randomized trial of fecal diversion for sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:961–964; discussion 964-965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC, et al. Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:686–689.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr., Oliveira L, Gilliland JE, Wexner SD. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41: 1516–1522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen AS, Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ, Mackeigan JM, Hoyt C. Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1005–1009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ha HT, Fleshman JW, Smith M, Read TE, Kodner IJ, Birnbaum EH. Manometric squeeze pressure difference parallels functional outcome after overlapping sphincter reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44: 655–660.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Hool GR, Lieber ML, Church JM. Postoperative anal canal length predicts outcome in patients having sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:313–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Oliveira L, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg. 1996;83:502–505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ternent CA, Shashidharan M, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Sentovich SM. Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40: 462–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA, Koorevaar M. Anal sphincter repair improves anorectal function and endosonographic image. A prospective clinical study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:878–885.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Morgan R, Patel B, Beynon J, Carr ND. Surgical management of anorectal incontinence due to internal anal sphincter deficiency. Br J Surg. 1997;84:226–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Leroi AM, Kamm MA, Weber J, Denis P, Hawley PR. Internal anal sphincter repair. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:243–245.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Abou-Zeid AA. Preliminary experience in management of fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:198–202; discussion 204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Sphincter repair for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32: 39–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Melia M. Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Surg. 1988;58:703–710.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Engel AF, van Baal SJ, Brummelkamp WH. Late results of anterior sphincter plication for traumatic faecal incontinence. Eur J Surg. 1994;160:633–636.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:345–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A. An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:134–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Baeten GMI, Geerdes BP, Adang EMM, et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1600–1605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A, et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:743–751.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, et al. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1427–1435.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wexner SD, Baeten C, Bailey R, et al. Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:809–818.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ruckauer KD. Dynamic graciloplasty in children with fecal incontinence: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1036–1039.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Caudry M, Saric J. Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2000;87:909–913.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Rouanet P, Senesse P, Bouamrirene D, et al. Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:451–456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Rongen MJ, Dekker FA, Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Baeten CG. Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after Miles resection-feasible, but with a high morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42:776–780; discussion 781.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1987:244–245.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F, Romano G, Melega E, Rinaldi M. Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1481–1486.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. O’Brien PE, Skinner S. Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1213–1216.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Christiansen J, Rasmussen OO, Lindorff-Larsen K. Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence. Ann Surg. 1999;230:45–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Lehur PA, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S, Buzelin JM, Leborgne J. Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. A single institution report. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;13:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Wong WD, Jensen LL, Bartolo DC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:1345–1351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Lehur PA, Roig JV, Duinslaeger M. Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1100–1106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Wong WD, Group ACT. The artificial bowel sphincter-results of a multicenter clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:A5–A26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ortiz H, Armendariz P, DeMiguel M, Ruiz MD, Alos R, Roig JV. Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation. Br J Surg. 2002;89:877–881.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Congilosi S, Spencer M, Madoff R, Jensen L, Wong W, Rothenberger D. The artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution [abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:A26.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Madoff RD, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, et al. Standards for anal sphincter replacement. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:135–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:9–16; discussion 17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995;346:1124–1127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Ganio E, Masin A, Ratto C, et al. Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: results in 40 patients: evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1261–1267.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Rosen HR, Urbarz C, Holzer B, Novi G, Schiessel R. Sacral nerve stimulation as a treatment for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2001;121:536–541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Hohenberger W. Chronic sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: long-term results with foramen and cuff electrodes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:59–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Malouf AJ, Vaizey CJ, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Ann Surg. 2000;232:143–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Turner IC, Nicholls RJ, Woloszko J. Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 1999;44:407–412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Creasey GH, Grill JH, Korsten M, et al. An implantable neuroprosthesis for restoring bladder and bowel control to patients with spinal cord injuries: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82: 1512–1519.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Siegel S, Paszkiewicz E, Kirkpatrick C, Hinkel B, Oleson K. Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with chronic intractable pelvic pain. J Urol. 2001;166:1742–1745.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Creasey GH, Dahlberg JE. Economic consequences of an implanted neuroprosthesis for bladder and bowel management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1520–1525.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Feretis C, Benakis P, Dailianas A, et al. Implantation of microballoons in the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1605–1609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Bernardi C, Favetta U, Pescatori M. Autologous fat injection for treatment of fecal incontinence: manometric and echographic assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1626–1628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Kumar D, Benson MJ, Bland JE. Glutaraldehyde cross-linked collagen in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1998;85:978–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Shafik A. Perianal injection of autologous fat for treatment of sphincteric incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:583–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, et al. Radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:915–922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA

    Susan C. Parker MD

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA

    Amy Thorsen MD

Authors
  1. Susan C. Parker MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Thorsen MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK

    John Beynon BSc, MS, FRCS  & Nicholas D. Carr MD, FRCS  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parker, S.C., Thorsen, A. (2005). Innovations in the Treatment of Faecal Incontinence. In: Beynon, J., Carr, N.D. (eds) Progress in Colorectal Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-058-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-058-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-823-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-058-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation