Skip to main content

Managing Functional Problems Following Dynamic Graciloplasty

  • Chapter
Book cover Complex Anorectal Disorders

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, and Metzger JT. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg. 1952;135(6):853–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pette D. Fiber transformation and fiber replacement in chronically stimulated muscle. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1992;11:S299–S305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baeten C, Spaans F, and Fluks A. An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31(2):134–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Konsten J, Baeten CG, Havenith MG, and Soeters PB. Morphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(6):559–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mander BJ, Wexner SD, Williams NS, Bartolo DC, Lubowski DZ, Oresland T, et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Br J Surg. 1999;86(12):1543–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seccia M, Menconi C, Balestri R, and Cavina E. Study protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(9):897–904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mavrantonis C, Billotti VL, and Wexner SD. Stimulated graciloplasty for treatment of intractable fecal incontinence: critical influence of the method of stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(4):497–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rongen MJGMU, O; El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, Konsten J, and Baeten CGMI. Long term results of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. In press 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Baeten CG, Buie WD, Christiansen J, et al. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(10):1427–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, and Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty. Complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(8):912–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rongen MJGM, Adang EM, Gerritsen van der Hoop A, and Baeten CI. One step versus two step procedure in dynamic graciloplasty. Submitted 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geerdes BP, Kurvers HA, Konsten J, Heineman E, and Baeten CG. Assessment of ischaemia of the distal part of the gracilis muscle during transposition for anal dynamic graciloplasty. Br J Surg. 1997;84(8):1127–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(9):1139–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams NS, Ogunbiyi OA, Scott SM, Fajobi O, and Lunniss PJ. Rectal augmentation and stimulated gracilis anal neosphincter: a new approach in the management of fecal urgency and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Briel JW, Schouten WR, Vlot EA, Smits S, and van Kessel I. Clinical value of colonic irrigation in patients with continence disturbances. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(7):802–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rongen MJ, van der Hoop AG, and Baeten CG. Cecal access for antegrade colon enemas in medically refractory slow-transit constipation: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(11):1644–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Abercrombie JE and Williams NS. Total anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg. 1995;82(4):438–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Gerdes BP, Konsten J, and Baeten CG. Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:716–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A, et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:743–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baeten, C.G., Rongen, M.J. (2005). Managing Functional Problems Following Dynamic Graciloplasty. In: Complex Anorectal Disorders. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-690-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-057-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics