Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anorectal Anatomy: The Contribution of New Technology

  • Chapter
Complex Anorectal Disorders

  • 853 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. deSouza NM, Puni R, Zbar A, Gilderdale DJ, Coutts GA, and Krausz T. MR imaging of the anal sphincter in multiparous females using an endoanal coil: correlation with in vitro anatomy and appearances in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1465–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gold DM, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Humphries KN, Kamm MA, and Kmiot WA. Three-dimensional endoanal sonography in assessing anal canal injury. Br J Surg. 1999;86:365–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zbar AP and Kmiot WA. Anorectal investigation. In: Phillips RKS, editor. A companion to specialist surgical practice—Colorectal surgery. 1st ed. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd; 1998. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams AB, Cheetham MJ, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, and Kmiot WA. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated by three-dimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1674–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zbar AP, Beer-Gabel M, Chiappa AC, and Aslam M. Fecal incontinence after minor anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1610–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kluth D and Lambrecht W. Current concepts in the embryology of anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1997;6(4):180–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tourneux F. Sur le premiers developments du cloaque du tubercle genitale et de l’anus chez l’embryon moutons avec quelques remarques concernant le development des glandes prostatiques. J Anat Physiol. 1888;24:503–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Retterer E. Sur l’origin et de l’evolution de la region ano-genitale des mammifieres. J Anat Physiol. 1890;26:126–210.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stephens FD. Embryology of the cloaca and embryogenesis of anorectal malformations. In: Stephens FD and Durham-Smith E, editors. Anorectal malformations in children: Update. New York: Alan R Liss Inc.; 1988. p. 177–209.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Putte SCJ. Normal and abnormal development of the anorectum. J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21(5):434–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bill AH and Johnson RJ. Failure of migration of the rectal opening as the cause for most cases of imperforate anus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958;106:643–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikebukuro K-I and Ohkawa H. 3-dimensional analysis of anorectal embryology. A new technique for microscopic study using computer graphics. Pediatr Surg Int. 1994;9:2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kluth D, Hiller M, and Lambrecht W. The principles of normal and abnormal hindgut development. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:1143–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Danforth CH. Developmental anomalies in a special strain of mice. Am J Anat. 1930;45:275–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunn LC, Gluecksohn-Schoenheimer S, and Bryson V. A new mutation in the mouse affecting spinal column and urogenital system. J Hered. 1940;31:343–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gluecksohn-Schoenheimer S. The morphological manifestation of a dominant mutation in mice affecting tail and urogenital systems. Genetics. 1943;28:341–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kluth D, Lambrecht W, Reich P, et al. SD-mice—an animal model for complex anorectal malformations. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1991;1:183–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hassink EA, Riev PN, and Severijnen RS. Are adults content or continent after repair for high anal atresia? Ann Surg. 1993;218:196–2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaston E. Physiological basis for preservation of fecal continence after resection of the rectum. JAMA. 1952;146:1486–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hollinshead H. Anatomy for surgeons, Vol 2. Thorax, abdomen and Pelvis. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1971. p. 708–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duthie HL and Watts J. Contribution of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone in the anal canal. Gut. 1965;6:64–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ihre T. Studies on anal function in continent and incontinent patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1974;9Suppl 25:1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frenckner B, von Euler B. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut. 1975;16:482–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lund JN and Scholefield JH. Aetiology and treatment of anal fissure. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1335–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis WG, Williamson ME, Miller AS, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, and Johnston D. Preservation of complete sphincteric proprioception in restorative proctocolectomy: the inhibitory reflex and fine control of continence need not be impaired. Gut. 1995;36:902–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio VW, Oakley J, Church J, and Milsom J. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg. 1991;161:90–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Abbasakoor MG, Nelson M, Beynon J, Patel B, and Carr ND. Anal endosonography in patients with anorectal symptoms after haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1522–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zbar AP, Aslam M, and Allgar V. Faecal incontinence after internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure. Tech Coloproctol. 2000;4:25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zbar AP, Aslam M, Gold DM, Gatzen C, Gosling A, and Kmiot WA. Parameters of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:200–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaur G, Gardiner A, and Duthie GS. Rectoanal reflex parameters in incontinence and constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:928–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zbar AP and Jonnalagadda R. Parameters of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in different anorectal disorders. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:557–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudsson CN, Nicholls JR, and Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol. 1994;49:368–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zbar AP, Kmiot WA, Aslam M, Williams A, Hider A, Audisio RA, Chiappa AC, and deSouza NM. Use of vector volume manometry and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the adult female for assessment of anal sphincter dysfunction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1411–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Burnett SJD and Bartram CI. Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991;6:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, and Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1997;349:612–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schafer A, Enck P, Furst G, Kahn T, Frieling T, and Lubke HJ. Anatomy of the anal sphincters: comparison of anal endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:777–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sangwan YP and Coller JA. Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1297–1311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zbar AP, Jayne DG, Mathur D, Ambrose NS, and Guillou PJ. The importance of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) in maintaining continence: anatomical, physiological and pharmacological considerations. Colorectal Dis. 2000;2:193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zbar AP, Salazar R, Ramesh J, and Pescatori M. Conventional cutting versus internal anal sphincter-preserving seton for high trans-sphincteric fistula: a prospective randomized manometric and clincal trial. Tech Coloproctol. In press 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zbar AP. Magnetic resonance imaging and the coloproctologist. Tech Coloproctol. 2001;5:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kmiot WA, Zbar AP, and deSouza NM. MRI in anorectal disease. In: Nicholls RJ and Dozois RR, editors. Surgery of the colon and rectum. New York: Churchill Livingstone. p. 68–98.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Riolan J. Anatomia 162 (1577–1657). As quoted in Dalley AF. The riddle of the sphincters: the morphophysiology of the anorectal mechanisms reviewed. Am Surgeon. 1987;53:298–306.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Santorini GD. Septum decum tabulae edit et explicit. Parone: Mich. Gerardi. 1715;tabula 15.

    Google Scholar 

  44. von Holl M. Handbuch der anatomie des menchen von Bardeleben. 1897;7 book 2, section 7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Milligan ETC and Morgan CN. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal with special reference to ano-rectal fistulae. Lancet. 1934;2:150–6, 1213–7.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gorsch RV. Proctologic anatomy. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Courtney H. Anatomy of the pelvic diaphragm and anorectal musculature as related to sphincter preservation in anorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 1950;79:155–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fowler R. Landmarks and legends of the anal canal. Aust N Z J Surg. 1957;27:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilson PM. Anchoring mechanisms of the anorectal region. S Afr Med J. 1967;41:1127–32, 1138–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Oh C and Kark AE. Anatomy of the external anal sphincter. Br J Surg. 1972;59:717–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. I. The external anal sphincter: a triple loop system. Invest Urol. 1975;13: 412–9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Milligan ETC. The surgical anatomy and disorders of the perianal space. Proc R Soc Med. 1942;36:366–78.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Frudinger A, Bartram CI, and Kamm MA. Transvaginal versus anal endosonography for detecting damage to the anal sphincter. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1435–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bollard RC, Gardiner A, Phillips K, and Duthie GS. Natural gaps in the female anal sphincter and the risk of postdelivery sphincter injury. Br J Surg. 1999;86Suppl 1:50–1(A).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fucini C, Elbetti C, and Messerini L. Anatomical pnae of seperation between the external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle: clinical implications. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:374–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bogduk N. Issues in anatomy: the external anal sphincter revisited. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66:626–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zbar AP and Beer-Gabel M. Gender differences in the longitudinal pressure profile of the anal canal related to anatomical structure as demonstrated on three-dimensional anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1016.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bartram CI and Frudinger A. Handbook of endoanal endosonography. Petersfield, UK: Wrightson Biomedical Publishing; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zbar AP and deSouza NM. The anal sphincter. In: deSouza, editor. Endocavitary MRI of the pelvis. The Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cruvelhier H. Traite d’anatomie descriptive. Paris: Labe; 1852.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lawson JON. Pelvic anatomy. I. Pelvic floor muscles. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1974;54:244–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. III. The longitudinal anal muscle: anatomy and role in sphincter mechanism. Invest Urol. 1976;13:271–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ayoub SF. The anterior fibres of the levator ani muscle in man. J Anat. 1979;128:571–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. IV. Anatomy of the perianal spaces. Invest Urol. 1976;13:424–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rudinger N. Topographisch chirurgische Anatomie des Menschen. Stuttgart: JG Cotta;1878. p. 111–2.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Roux C. Contribution to the knowledge of the anal muscles in man. Arch Mikr Anat. 1881;19:721–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Parks AG. A note on the anatomy of the anal canal. Proc R Soc Med. 1954;47:997–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilde FR. The anal intermuscular septum. Br J Surg. 1949;36:279–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Lunniss PJ and Phillips RKS. Anatomy and function of the anal longitudinal muscle. Br J Surg. 1992;79:882–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Gerdes B, Kohler HH, Stinner B, Barth PJ, Celik I, and Rothmund M. The longitudinal muscle of the anal canal. Chirug. 1997;68:1281–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Hansen HH. Die Betendung des Musculus canalis ani für die Kontinenz und anorectale Erkrangungen. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1976;341:23–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Treitz W. Uber Einen neuen Muskel am Doudenum des Menschen, uber elastische Sehnen, und einige andere anatomische Verhaltuisse. Viertal-Jahrschrift für die praktische Heilkunde. 1853;37:113–44.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Levy E. Anorectal musculature. Am J Surg. 1936;34:141–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Fine J and Wickhma Lawes CH. On the muscle fibres of the anal submucosa, with special reference to the pectin band. Br J Surg. 1940;27:723–7.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Haas PA and Fox TA. The importance of the perianal connective tissue in the surgical anatomy and function of the anus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20:303–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Morgan CN and Thompson HR. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal with special reference to the surgical importance of the internal sphincter and conjoint longitudinal muscle. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1956;19:88–114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 4th ed. London: Baillière Tindall; 1980. p. 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Brooks JD, Eggener SE, and Chao W-M. Anatomy of the rectourethralis muscle. Eur Urol. 2002;41:94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ellis GV. Demonstrations of anatomy. 8th ed. London: Smith Elder; 1878. p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Goff BH. Histological study of the perivaginal fascia in nullipara. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1931;52:32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ricci JV and Thom CH. The myth of a surgically useful fascia in vaginal plastic reconstructions. Q Rev Surg Obstet Gynecol. 1954;11:253–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Uhlenluth E, Wolfe WM, Smith EM, and Middleton EB. The rectovaginal septum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1948;86:148–63.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Uhlenluth E and Nolley GW. Vaginal fascia, a myth? Obstet Gynecol. 1957;10:349–58.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Milley PS and Nichols DH. A correlative investigation of the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec. 1969;163(3):443–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Nichols DH and Milley PS. Surgical significance of the rectovaginal septum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;15:215–20.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Fritsch H. The connective tissue sheath of uterus and vagina in the human female fetus. Ann Anat. 1992;174:261–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Fritsch H. Topography and subdivision of the pelvic connective tissue in human fetuses and in the adult. Surg Radiol Anat. 1994;16:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Fritsch H and Hotzinger H. Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, visceral pelvic connective tissue and its compartments. Clin Anat. 1995;8:17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Fröhlich B, Hötzinger H, and Fritsch H. Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, pelvic floor, and related structures. Clin Anat. 1997;10:223–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kocks J. Normale und Pathologische Lage und Gestalt des Uterus Sowie Deren Mechanik, Bonn: Cohen; 1880. p. 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Thompson P. On the arrangement of the fasciae of the pelvis and their relationship to the levator ani. J Anat Physiol. 1901;35:127–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Pernkopf E. Topografische Anatomie. Bd 2, 1. und 2. Hälfte. Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1941. p. 191–7, 513–23.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Courtney H. Anatomy of the pelvic diaphragm and anorectal musculature as related to sphincter preservation in anorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 1959;79:155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Fritsch H, Bruch H-P, and Kühnel W. Development and topography of the perirectal spaces. Proceedings of the First European Congress of Clinical Anatomy; September 1991; Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Fritsch H, Fröhlich B. Development of the levator ani muscle in human fetuses. Early Hum Dev. 1994;37:15–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Fritsch H. Klinische anatomie des kontinenzorgans. Zentralb Chir. 1996;121:613–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Fritsch H, Kühnel W, and Stelzner F. Entwicklung und klinische anatomie der adventita recti; Bedeutung für die Radikaloperation eines Mastadrmkrebses. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1996;381:237–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Ludwikowski B, Hayward IO, and Fritsch H. Rectovaginal fascia: An important structure in pelvic visceral surgery? About its development, structure, and function. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:634–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. DeLancey JO. Standing anatomy of the pelvic floor. J Pelv Surg. 1996;2:260–3.

    Google Scholar 

  100. DeLancey JOL. Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:815–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Denonvilliers C.P-D. Anatomie du perinée. Bull Soc Anat, Paris. 1836;11:105–6.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Denonvilliers C. Propositions et observations d’anatomie, de physiologie et de pathologie. Theses 285, Paris; 1837. As cited in Wesson MB, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Wesson MB. The development and surgical importance of the rectourethralis muscle and Denonvilliers’ fascia. J Urol. 1922;8:339–59.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Dietrich H. Giovanni Domenico Santorini (1681–1737) Charles-Pierre Denonvilliers (1808–1872). First description of urosurgically relevant structures in the small pelvis. Eur Urol. 1997;32(1):124–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Van Ophoven A and Roth S. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical debate. J Urol. 1997;157:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and a presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in 4 cases. Johns Hopkins Hosp Bull. 1905;16:315.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Cuneo B and Veau V. De la signification morphologique des aponeuroses perivesicales. J Anat Physiol. 1899;35:235.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Smith GE. Studies in the anatomy of the pelvis, with special reference to the fasciae and visceral supports. Part 1. J Anat Physiol. 1908;42:198, 252.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Aigner F, Zbar AP, Ludwikowski B, Kreczy A, Kovacs P, and Fritsch H. The rectogenital septum: morphology, function and clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum. In press 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993;36:976–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Richardson AC. The anatomic defects in rectocele and enterocele. J Pelv Surg. 1995;1:214–21.

    Google Scholar 

  112. von Hagens G, Tiedemann K, and Kriz W. The current potential of plastination. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1987;175:411–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, and Pescatori M. Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:369–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Medicine and Research, University of the West Indies, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados

    Andrew P. Zbar MD, FRCS, FRACS

Authors
  1. Andrew P. Zbar MD, FRCS, FRACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zbar, A.P. (2005). Anorectal Anatomy: The Contribution of New Technology. In: Complex Anorectal Disorders. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-690-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-057-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation