Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Management of Alkaline Reflux

  • Chapter
Book cover Managing Failed Anti-Reflux Therapy

  • 579 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeMeester S, DeMeester T. Esophageal pH studies in esophageal disease. In: Shields TW, LoCicero J III, Ponn RB, eds. General Thoracic Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:1635–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vaezi M. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux. In: Castell DO, Richter JE, eds. The Esophagus. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:434–450.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ollyo JB, Monnier P, Fontolliet C, et al. The natural history and incidence of reflux oesophagitis. Gullet 1993;3: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iascone C, De Meester TR, Little AG, et al. Barrett’s esophagus. Functional assessment, proposed pathogenesis and surgical therapy. Arch Surg 1983;118:543–549.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillen P, Keeling P, Bryne PJ, et al. Barrett’s oesophagus: pH profile. Br J Surg 1987;74:774–776.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Salo JA, Kivilaakso E. Role of bile salts and trypsin in the pathogenesis of experimental alkaline esophagitis. Surgery 1983;93:525–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kivilaakso E, Fromm D, Silen W. Effect of bile salts and related compounds on isolated esophageal mucosa. Surgery 1980;87:280–285.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harmon J, Johnson L, Maydonovitch C. Effects of acid and bile salts on the rabbit esophageal mucosa. Dig Dis Sci 1981;26:65–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lillemoe KD, Johnson LF, Harmon JW. Taurodeoxycholate modulates the effect of pepsin and trypsin in experimental esophagitis. Surgery 1985;97:662–667.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Salo JA, Kivilaakso E. Role of luminal H+ in the pathogenesis of experimental esophagitis. Surgery 1982;92: 61–68.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Safaie-Shirazi S. Effect of pepsin on ionic permeability of canine esophageal mucosa. J Surg Res 1977;27:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gotley DC, Morgan AP, Ball D, et al. Composition of gastroesophageal refluxate. Gut 1991;32:1093–1099.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Kauer W, et al. “Alkaline” gastroesophageal reflux: assessment by ambulatory esophageal aspiration and pH monitoring. Am J Surg 1994;167: 163–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradley EL III, Isaacs J, Hersh T, et al. Nutritional consequences of total gastrectomy. Ann Surg 1975;182: 415–429.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Attwood SEA, Smyrk TC, DeMeester TR, et al. Duodenoesophageal reflux and development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in rats. Surgery 1992;111:503–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark GWB, Smyrk TC, Mirvish SS, et al. Effect of gastroduodenal juice and dietary fat on the development of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal neoplasia: an experimental rat model. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1: 252–261.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein HJ, Barlow AP, DeMeester TR, et al. Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid and acid/alkaline exposure, and duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg 1992; 216:35–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1996;111:1192–1199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DeMeester T, Attwood S, Smyrk T, et al. Surgical therapy in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 1990;212:528–542.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Topart P, Vandenbroucke F. Biliopancreatic reflux esophagitis. The role of the Roux-en-Y long limb diversion. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2001;11:605–618.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fein M, Ireland AP, Ritter M, et al. Duodenogastric reflux potentiates the injurious effects of gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg 1997;1:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Batzri S, Harmon JW, Schweitzer EJ, et al. Bile acid accumulation in gastric mucosal cell. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1991;1997:393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mason RJ, DeMeester TR. Importance of duodenogastric reflux in the surgical outpatient practice. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:48–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mattioli S, Pilotti S, Felice V, et al. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring of esophagus, fundus, and antrum: a new technique for simultaneous study of gastroesophageal and duodenogastric reflux. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:929–938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Payne WS. Prevention and treatment of biliary-pancreatic reflux esophagitis. The role of long-limb Roux-Y. Surg Clin North Am 1983;63:851–858.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sears RJ, Champion G, Richter JE. Characteristics of partial gastrectomy (PG) patients with esophageal symptoms of duodenogastric reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:211–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vaezi MF, Richter JE. Acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in postgastrectomy patients: response to therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:A80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, et al. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 1994;107: 747–754.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stein HJ, Smyrk TC, DeMeester TR, et al. Clinical value of endoscopy and histology in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux disease. Surgery 1992;112:796–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stein H, DeMeester T. Who benefits from anti-reflux surgery? World J Surg 1992;16:313–319.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mittal RK, Reuben A, Whitney JO, et al. Do bile acids reflux into the esophagus? A study in normal subjects and patients with GERD. Gastroenterology 1987;92: 371–375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gotley DC, Morgan AP, Cooper MJ. Bile acid concentration in the refluxate of patients with reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988;23:587–590.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bechi P, Falciai R, Baldini F, et al. A new fiberoptic sensor for ambulatory entero-gastric reflux detection. In: Katzir A, ed. Fiberoptic Medical and Fluorescent Sensors and Applications. Bellingham, WA: SPIE; 1992;1648: 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bechi P, Pucciani F, Baldini F, et al. Long term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kauer WKH, Burdiles P, Ireland AP, et al. Does duodenal juice reflux into the esophagus of patients with complicated GERD? Evaluation of a fiberoptic sensor of bilirubin. Am J Surg 1995;169:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tolin RD, Malmud LS, Stelzer F, et al. Enterogastric reflux in normal subjects and patients with Billroth II gastroenterostomy. Measurement of enterogastric reflux. Gastroenterology 1979;77:1027–1033.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stein HJ, Hinder RA, DeMeester TR, et al. Clinical use of 24-hour gastric pH monitoring vs. o-diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid (DISIDA) scanning in the diagnosis of pathologic duodenogastric reflux. Arch Surg 1990;125: 966–971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Drane WE, Karvelis K, Johnson DA. Scintigraphic evaluation of duodenogastric reflux. Problems, pitfalls, and technical review. Clin Nucl Med 1987;12:377–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaye MD, Showalter JP. Pyloric incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. J Lab Clin Med 1974;83:198–206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gillen P, Keeling P, Byrne PJ, et al. Importance of duodenogastric reflux in the pathogenesis of Barrett’s oesophagus. Br J Surg 1988;75:540–543.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Iftikhar SY, Ledingham S, Steele R, et al. Bile reflux in columnar-lined Barrett’s oesophagus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;74:411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  42. DeMeester TR, Costantini M. Function tests. In: Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Hiebert CA, McKneally MF, Urschel HC, eds. Esophageal Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:119–150.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fuchs KH, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA, et al. Computerized identification of pathologic duodenogastric reflux using 24-hour gastric pH monitoring. Ann Surg 1991;213:13–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Skinner DB. Surgical management after failed antire flux operations. World J Surg 1992;16:359–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Singh S, Bradley LA, Richter JE. Determinants of oesophageal “alkaline” pH environment in controls and patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Gut 1993;34:309–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. DeVault KR, Georgenson S, Castell DO. Salivary stimulation mimics esophageal exposure to refluxed duodenal contents. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1040–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Oberg S, Ritter MP, Crooks PF, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and mucosal injury with emphasis on short-segment Barrett’s esophagus and duodenogastroesophageal reflux. J Gastrointestinal Surg 1998;2: 547–554.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fein M, Ireland AP, Ritter MP, et al. Duodenogastric reflux potentiates the injurious effects of gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg 1997;1:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Duranceau A, Ferraro P, Jamieson G. Evidenced-based investigation for reflux disease. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2001;11:495–506.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. DeMeester TR, Fuchs KA, Ball CS, Albertucci M, Smyrk TC, Marcus JN. Experimental and clinical results with proximal and end-to-end duodenojejunostomy for pathologic duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg 1987;206: 414–426.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Madura JA, Grosfeld JL. Biliary diversion.A new method to prevent enterogastric reflux and reverse the Roux stasis syndrome. Arch Surg 1997;132:245–249.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Holt CJ, Large AM. Surgical management of reflux esophagitis. Ann Surg 1961;153:555–562.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kennedy T, Green R. Roux diversion for bile reflux following gastric surgery. Br J Surg 1978;65:323–325.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Fekete F, Pateron P, Sauvanet A, Kabbej M. La diversion duodenale totale dans le traitement des oesophagites peptiques complexes. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1997;21: 823–831.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ellis FH Jr, Gibb SP. Vagotomy, antrectomy, and Rouxen-Y diversion for complex reoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1994;220:536–543.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bonavina L, Incarbone R, Segalin A, Chella B, Peracchia A. Duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux after gastric surgery: surgical therapy and outcome in 42 consecutive patients. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:92–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Washer JF, Gear MWL, Dowling BL, Gillison EW, Royston CMS, Spencer J. Randomized prospective trial of Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion versus fundoplication for severe reflux esophagitis. Br J Surg 1984;71:181–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Fekete F, Pateron D. What is the place of antrectomy with Roux-en-Y in the treatment of reflux disease? Experience with 83 total duodenal diversions. World J Surg 1992;16:349–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Madura JA. Primary bile reflux gastritis: which treatment is better, Roux-en-Y or biliary diversion? Am Surg 2000;66:417–424.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hinder RA. Duodenal switch: a new form of pancreaticobiliary diversion. Surg Clin North Am 1992;72: 487–500.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hinder RA, Bremner CG. The uses and consequences of the Roux-en-Y operation. Surg Annu 1987;19:151–174.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Welch NT, Yasui A, Kim CB, et al. Effect of duodenal switch procedure on gastric acid production, intragastric pH, gastric emptying, and gastrointestinal hormones. Am J Surg 1992;163:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Gustavsson S, Ilstrup D, Morisson P, Kelly KA. Roux stasis syndrome after gastrectomy. Am J Surg 1988;155: 490–494.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Davidson ED, Hersh T. The surgical treatment of bile reflux gastritis. A study of 59 patients. Ann Surg 1980;192:175–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Vogel SB, Woodward ER. The surgical treatment of chronic gastric atony following Roux-en-Y diversion for alkaline reflux gastritis. Ann Surg 1989;209:756–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Donovan IA, Drumm J, Harding LK, Alexander-Williams J. Effect of Roux-en-Y reconstruction on the gastric emptying of a solid meal. Br J Surg 1987;74: 491–492.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilson P, Anselmino M, Hinder RA. The duodenal switch operation for duodenogastric reflux. Prob Gen Surg 1993;10:242–252.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Klinger PJ, Perdikis G, Wilson P, Hinder RA. Indications, technical modalities and results of the duodenal switch operation for pathologic duodenogastric reflux. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Csendes A, Braghetto I, Burdiles P, Diaz J-C, Maluenda F, Korn O. A new physiological approach for the surgical treatment of patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Technical considerations and results in 65 patients. Ann Surg 1997;226:123–133.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Deschamps C. Use of colon and jejunum as possible esophageal replacements. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1995;5: 555–569.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Allen MS, Pairolero PC, Johnson JO, Larson DR. Long-term results after reoperation for failed anti-reflux procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:545–551.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jose M. Clavero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Topart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claude Deschamps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Professor of Surgery, Head, Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Mark K. Ferguson MD

  2. Professor of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

    M. Brian Fennerty MD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clavero, J.M., Topart, P., Deschamps, C. (2006). Management of Alkaline Reflux. In: Ferguson, M.K., Fennerty, M.B. (eds) Managing Failed Anti-Reflux Therapy. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-011-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-011-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-909-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-011-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation