Abstract
The experience from years of development and use, the advance of technology, and the development of authoring tools for questions and tests has resulted in a sophisticated, computer based assessment system. However, there is still a lot of room for further development. Some of the current ideas for development are discussed in the remainder of this work. A primary aim of assessment, both formative and summative, is provide the necessary information to improve future educational experiences because it provides feedback on whether the course and learning objectives have been achieved to satisfactory level. Yet, it is important that the assessment data be accurate and relevant to effectively make informed decisions about the curriculum. Moreover, formative assessment can also be used to help bridge the gap between assessment and learning. This may be achieved particularly where assessment strategies are combined with useful feedback, and integrated within the learning process. The answers to the described objectives are enhanced if we could integrate adaptive testing techniques; accurate and fitted assessment data may improve both the curriculum and the student ability level. The idea behind a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is quite forward: to apply to each examinee only those items useful to know his proficiency level. As a consequence of this, CAT is more efficient than conventional (i.e., fixeditem) tests. It provides more precise measurements for same-length tests or shorter tests for same-precision measurements.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T.J.H.M. Eggen, “Overexposure and underexposure of items in computerized adaptive testing”, 2001, http://download.citogroep.nl/pub/pok/reports/Report01-01.pdf
Bradley A. Hanson, IRT Command Language (ICL), 2002, http://www.b-a-h.com/software/irt/icl/
Chi-keung Leung, Hua-hua Chang, Kit-tai Hau, “Making a-Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing Design More Practical: Imposing Non-statistical Constraints”,2001, http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/GCJCE/gcjce04/gcjce04.html
Hambleton R., Swaminathan H., Rogers J., Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, New Bury Park, SAGE Publications, 1991.
Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159–176.
P.W. van Rijn, T.J.H.M. Eggen, B.T. Hemker, P.F. Sanders,“A Selection Procedure for Polytomous Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing”, 2000, http://download.citogroep.nl/pub/pok/reports/Report00-05.pdf
Wainer H. and other, Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer, 2° edizone, Mahwah, Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carbonaro, A., Casadei, G., Riccucci, S. (2004). An Adaptive Assessment System to Evaluate Student Ability Level. In: Bramer, M., Devedzic, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. AIAI 2004. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 154. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8151-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8151-0_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8150-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8151-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive