Abstract
The issue of the legitimacy of Information Systems is important for researchers in this field because other disciplines have begun to lay claim to research topics often thought to belong to the domain of IS research, and the field itself is under challenge in academic intuitions around the world (Avison 2002). Benbasat and Zmud’s (2003) opinion is that IS has gained socio-political legitimacy but not cognitive legitimacy in large measure because the object of study in much IS research is not clearly delineated. In part, they are defining a disciplinary boundary issue and beginning to define criteria by which our field may be distinguished from reference disciplines or other related disciplines. Therefore, to gain more cognitive legitimacy, a clearer understanding of what we mean by “an information system” and of the central issues driving its creation and use is needed if it is at the core of that which we study. This paper advances that discourse by examining the role of a handful of French scholars, many of whom are not well known out of French academic circles, but whose thoughts on the issue are useful in furthering the debate on the ontological grounding of our field.
Keywords
Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, S., and Whetten, D. A. “Organizational Identity,” Research in Organizational Behavior (7), 1985, pp. 263–295.
Alter, S. “A General, Yet Useful theory of Information Systems,” Communications of the AIS (1:13), 2003.
Avison, D. “The UK Information Systems Perspective: A Personal View,” Systeme d’Infomation et Management (3:7), 2002, pp. 49–54.
Ballé, C., and Peaucelle, J. L. The Power of Data Processing, Paris: Editions d’organisation, 1973.
Banville, C., and Landry, M. “Can the Field of MIS Be Disciplined?,” Communications of the ACM (32:1) 1989, pp. 48–60.
Baskerville, R. L., and Myers, M. D. “Information Systems as a Reference Discipline,” MIS Quarterly (26:1), 2002, pp. 1–14.
Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. “The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), 2003, pp. 183, 193.
Besson, P., and Rowe F. “ERP Project Dynamics and Enacted Dialogue: Perceived Understanding, Perceived Leeway, and the Nature of Task-Related Conflicts,” DataBase (32:4), 2001, pp. 47–66.
Bijker, W. E. “The Social Construction of Fluorescent Lighting, or How an Aircraft was Invented in its Diffusion Stage,” in W. E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1994, pp. 75–102.
Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (Eds.). Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1994.
Bourdieu, M. Le sens pratique, Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1980.
Caillé, A. «La sociologie de l’intérêt est-elle intéressante?» Sociologie du travail (23:3), 1981, pp. 257–274.
Carr, N. “IT Doesn’t Matter,” Harvard Business Review, May 2003, pp. 1–10.
Crozier, M. «Le phénmomèn bureaucratique,» Paris: Seuil, 1963.
Crozier, M. «Préface,» in C. Ballé and J. L. Peaucelle, Le pouvoir informatique dans l’entreprise, Paris: Les Editions d’Organisation, 1973, pp. 11–19.
Crozier, M., and Friedberg, E. Actors and System: The Politics of Collective Action, Boston: Ginn and Co., 1977.
Culnan, M. J. “The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A Co-citation Analysis,” Management Science (32:2), 1986, pp. 156–172.
Culnan, M. J., and Swanson, E. B. “Research in Management Information Systems, 1980–1984: Points of Work and Reference,” MIS Quarterly (10:3), 1986, pp. 288–303.
Davis, G. B. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1974.
Davis, G. B., and Olson, M. H. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Develompent (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1985.
Dehaene, P. “Organization, Project and Strategy as Symbols,” in Proceedings of the Third Conference Economique et Intelligence Artificielle (CECOIA III-CEMIT), Tokyo, JASMIN, Volume I, 1992, pp. 243–247.
Desq, S.; Fallery, B.; Rodhain, F.; and Reix R. «25 ans de recherches en systèmes d’informations,» Systèmes d’Information et Management (7:3), 2002, pp. 5–33.
GRASCE. Entre systémique et complexité chemin faisant: mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Jean-Louis LeMoigne, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999.
Gray, R. “A Brief Historical Review of the Development of the Distinction Between Data and Information in the Information Systems Literature,” in J. Ross and D. Galletta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL, 2003, pp. 2843–2849.
Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. “Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (4:5), 2003, pp. 237–293.
Hirschheim, R.; Klein, H. K.; and Lyytinen, K. Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Husserl, E. Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie (3rd ed.), Paris: Gallimard, 1950 (1st ed., 1913).
Jones, M. R. “The Moving Finger: The Use of Social Theory in WG8.2 Conference Papers, 1975–1999,” in Baskerville, J. Stage, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 15–31.
Kallinikos, J. “Reopening the Black Box of Technology: Artefacts and Human Agency,” in L. Applegate, R. Galliers, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2002, pp. 287–294.
Karahanna, E.; Davis, G. B.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Watson, R., and Weber, R. “Embarking on Information Systems’ Voyage to Self-Discovery: Identifying the Core of the Discipline,” Panel Presentation at the 24th International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA, 2003.
Kvasny, L. “A Conceptual Framework For Examining Digital Inequality,” in R. Ramsower and J. Windsor (Eds.), Proceedings of 8th the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, August 2002a, pp. 1798–1805.
Kvasny, L. Problematizing the Digital Divide: Cultural and Social Reproduction in a Community Technology Initiative, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Information Systems, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, 2002b.
Kvasny, L., and Keil, M. “The Challenges of Redressing the Digital Divide: A Tale of Two Cities,” in L. Applegate, R. Galliers, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of 23rd the International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, December 2003, pp. 817–828.
Kvasny, L., and Truex, D. “Defining Away the Digital Divide: A Content Analysis of Institutional Influences on Popular Representations of Technology,” in B. Fitzgerald, N. Russo, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 399–414.
Kvasny, L., and Truex, D. “Information Technology and the Cultural Reproduction of Social Order: A Research Program,” In R. Baskerville, J. Stage, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 277–294.
Lamb, R., and Kling, R. “Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), 2003, pp. 197–235.
Landry, M., and LeMoigne J. L. “Towards a Theory of Organizational Systems: A General System Perspective,” in B. Gilchrist, Proceedings of the IFIP Congress’ 77, Amsterdam: Elsevier-Science, 1977, pp. 801–805.
Latour, B. We Never Have Been Modern (Nous n’avons jamain été modernes), C. Porter (trans), Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
Latour, B. “Social Theory and the Study of Computerized Work Sites,” in W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, London: Chapman & Hall, 1966, pp. 295–307.
LeMoigne, J. L. «La conception des systèmes d’information organisationnels: de l’ingénierie informatique à l’ingéniérie systémique,» in J. A. Bartoli and J. L. LeMoigne (Eds.), Organisation intelligente etsystéme d’information stratégique, Paris: Economica, 1996, pp. 25–52.
LeMoigne, J. L. La Modelisation des sytèmes complexes, Paris: Dunod, 1990.
LeMoigne, J. L. La theorie du systeme general, theorie de la modelisation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1977.
LeMoigne, J. L. Les systèmes d’information dans les organisations, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1973.
LeMoigne, J. L. Vers un système d’information organisationnel? Revue Française de Gestion, Novembre-Décembre, 1986, pp. 20–31.
LeMoigne, J. L., and Pascot, D. (Eds.). Les processus collectifs de mémorisation, Aix-en-Provence: Librairie de l’Université d’Aix-en-rovence, 1979.
LeMoigne, J. L., and Van Gigch J. P. “The Design of an Organization Information System: Intelligent Artifact for Complex Organizations,” Information and Management (19), 1990, pp. 325–331.
Marciniak, R., and Rowe F. Systèmes d’information et dynamique des organisations, Paris: Economica, 1997.
Mélèse, J. Approche systémique des organisations, Paris: Editions d’organisation, 1979.
Michaux, V., and Rowe, F., Complémentarité entre système d’information informatisé, communautés de pratiques et vigilance dans la haute fiabilité: le cas d’une compagnie d’assistance, Systèmes d’information et Management (9:1), 2004.
Monod, E. «Epistémologie de la recherche en systèmes d’information,» in F. Rowe (Ed.), Faire de la recherche en systèmes d’information, Paris: Vuibert, 2002, pp. 21–56.
Morley, C. “Information Systems Development Methods and User Participation: A Contingency Approach,” in D. Avison, J. E. Kendall, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1993, pp. 127–142.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Iacono, C. S. “Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT-A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact,” Information Systems Research (1:2), 2001, pp. 121–134.
Parsons, J., and Wand, Y. “Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Classes in Information Modeling,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems (25:2), 2000, pp. 228–268.
Peaucelle J.-L. Les systèmes d’information-la représentation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1981.
Postman, N. Conscientious Objections: Stirring up Trouble about Language, Technology and Education, New York: Vintage Books, 1988.
Purao, S.; Rossi, M.; and Bush, A. “Towards an Understanding of the Use of Problem and Design Spaces During Object-Oriented System Development,” Information and Organization (12:4), 2002.
Reix, R., and Rowe, F. «La recherche en systèmes d’information: de l’histoire au concept,» in F. Rowe (Ed.), Faire de la recherche en systèmes d’information, Paris: Vuibert, 2002, pp. 1–21.
Richardson, H. “CRM in Call Centres: The Logic of Practice,” in M. Korpela, R. Montealegre, and A. Poulymenakou (Eds.), Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, pp. 68–83.
Robey, D. “Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility,” Information Systems Research (7:4), 1996, pp. 400–408.
Rolland, C. «Introduction à la conception des systèmes d’information et panorama des méthodes disponibles,» Revue Génie logiciel (4), June, 1986, pp. 7–62.
Rowe, F., and Struck, D. “Cultural Values, Media Richness and Telecommunication Use in an Organization,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (9:3), 1999, pp. 161–92.
Saga, V., and Zmudm R. “The Nature and Determinants of Information Technology Acceptance, Routinization and Infusion,” in L. Levine (Ed.), Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1994, pp. 67–86.
Sartre J.-P. L’être et le néant: essai d’ontologie phénoménologique, Paris: Gallimard, 1943.
Sawyer, S., and Chen, T. “Conceptualizing Information Technology in the Study of Information Systems: Trends and Issues,” in E. Wynn, E. R. Whitley, M. Myers, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Global and Organizational Discourse About Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, pp. 109–131.
Schultze, U. “A Confessional Account of an Ethnography about Knowledge Work,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), 2001 a, pp. 1–39.
Schultze, U. “Reflexive Ethnography in Information Systems Research,” in E. Trauth (Ed.), Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 2001b, pp. 78–103.
Schultze, U., and Boland Jr., R. J. “Knowledge Management Technology and the Reproduction of Knowledge Wwork Practices,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (9), 2000, pp. 193–212.
Shapiro, S. “Places and Spaces: The Historical Interaction of Technology, Home, and Privacy,” The Information Society (14), 1998, pp. 275–284.
Soh, C., and Markus L. “How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis,” in J. I. DeGross, G. Ariav, C. Beath, R. Hoyer, and C. Kemerer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1985, pp. 29–41.
Tabourier Y. De l’autre côté de MERISE, Paris: Editions d’Organisation, 1986.
Van Maanen, J. Tales from the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Walsham, G. “Actor Network Theory and IS Research,” in A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997, pp. 446–480.
Walsham, G. “The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research,” Information Systems Research (6:4), 1995, pp. 376–394.
Weber, R. “Editors Comments: Theoretically Speaking,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), 2003, pp. iii–xiii.
Weber, R. “Towards a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Base for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Information Systems, Spring 1987, pp. 3–19.
Willcocks, L., and Lester, S. “How Do Organizations Evaluate and Control Information Systems Investments? Recent UK Survey Evidence,” in D. Avison, J. E. Kendall, and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1993, pp. 15–40.
Wilensky, R. Planning and Understanding: A Computational Approach to Human Reasoning, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowe, F., Truex, D.P., Kvasny, L. (2004). Cores and Definitions: Building the Cognitive Legitimacy of the Information Systems Discipline Across the Atlantic. In: Kaplan, B., Truex, D.P., Wastell, D., Wood-Harper, A.T., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 143. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8094-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8095-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive