Abstract
When it comes to investigating the relationship between the social and the technical, the Information Systems (IS)discipline has been a net importer of theories. These theories often carry differing interpretations of central concepts, which then become both contusing and difficult to integrate. In response to calls for IS to become a reference discipline in its own right (in other words, a theory exporter), this paper offers an example of integrative theory development. Instead of adapting a theory from another discipline or building a theory from empirical data, we examine the structure concept in some of its various theoretical adaptations in IS and try to integrate them to produce theory focusing on IS concerns while resolving some of the major areas of contention. Both social and technological versions of structure are investigated through three theoretical IS perspectives drawn from different reference disciplines. The first perspective relates to social theories (principally structuration theory), the second to linguistic theories (principally the structural linguistics of Chomsky), and the last to science studies (principally actor-network theory). The objective is to study areas of agreement and contention around the structure concept. Areas of agreement can be incorporated into integrative theory development, whereas areas of contention must be resolved (a far more difficult task). The resulting theoretical model is illustrated with a case study involving competence management systems design and use at Volvo Information Technology in Göteborg, Sweden.
Chapter PDF
References
AB Volvo. “På rätt spår” [On the Right Track], Corporate Report, 1987.
Akrich, M. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects,” in J. Law (Ed.), Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press: 1994, pp. 205–224.
Andersen, P.B. “What Semiotics Can and Cannot Do for HCI,” Knowledge-Based Systems (14:8), 2001, pp. 419–424.
Andersen, P.B., and Mathiassen, L. “Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering,” Semiotica (142:1/4), 2002, pp. 381–395.
Baskerville, R.L., and Myers, M.D. “Information Systems as a Reference Discipline,” MIS Quarterly (26:1), 2002, pp. 1–14.
Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., and Pinch, T. (Eds.). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
Callon, M. “Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility,” in J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 132–161.
Ciborra, C. (Ed.). From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Ciborra, C.U., and Lanzara, G.F. “Formative Contexts and Information Technology: Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation in Organizations,” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies (4:2), 1994, pp. 68–93.
Dahlbom, B. “Postface: From Infrastructure to Networking,” in C. Ciborra (Ed.), From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 212–226.
Dahlbom, B., and Mathiassen, L. Computers in Context, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M.S. “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science (5:2), 1994, pp. 121–147.
Fombrum, C., Tichy, N.M. et al. Strategic Human Resource Management, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984.
Galbraith, J. Designing Complex Organizations, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
Ghorpade, J., and Atchinson, T.J. “The Concept of Job Analysis: A Review and Some Suggestions,” Public Personnel Management (9), 1980, pp. 134–144.
Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory, London: Macmillan Press, 1979.
Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1984.
Giddens, A., and Turner, J.H. Social Theory Today, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1987.
Grint, K., and Woolgar, S. The Machine at Work, Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1997
Hanseth, O. “Actor-Network Theory and Information Infrastructures,” in C. Ciborra (Ed.), From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Hanseth, O., and Braa, K. “Who’s in Control: Designers, Managers or Technology,” in C. Ciborra (Ed.), From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Hanseth, O., and Monteiro, E. “Inscribing Behavior in Information Infrastructure Standards,” Accounting, Management & Information Technology (7:4), 1997, pp. 183–211.
Hill, S. The Tragedy of Technology, London: Pluto Press, 1988.
Holmström, J., and Stalder, F. “Drifting Technologies and Multi-Purpose Networks: The Case of the Swedish Cashcard,” Information and Organization (11), 2001, pp. 187–206.
Klein, H., and Myers, M. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), 1999, pp. 67–93.
Latour, B. “Technology is Society Made Durable,” in J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 103–131.
Latour, B. “On Recalling ANT,” in J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999, pp. 15–25.
Lawler, E.E., and Ledford, G. “A Skill-Based Approach to Human Resource Management,” European Management Journal (10:4), 1992, pp. 383–391.
Lawrence, P.R., and Lorsch, J.W. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Leavitt, H.J. “Applied Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches,” in J. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, pp. 1144–70.
Lee, A. “Editor’s Comments: MIS Quarterly’s Editorial Policies and Practices,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp. iii–vii.
Leifer, R., Lee, S., and Durgee, J. “Deep Structures: Real Information Requirements Determination,” Information & Management (27:5), November 1994, pp. 1–27.
Liu, K. Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Lutje, I. Software som Tekst, Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 2000
MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (Eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology, Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press, 1985.
Markus, M.L., and Robey, D. “Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research,” Management Science (24:5), 1988, pp. 583–598.
McClelland, D.C. “Testing for Competence Rather than for ‘Intelligence’,” American Psychologist (28), 1973, pp. 1–14.
Monteiro, E. “Actor-Network Theory and Information Infrastructure,” in C.U. Ciborra (Ed.), From Control to Drift, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 71–86.
Monteiro, E. “Scaling Information Infrastructure: The Case of Next-Generation IP in the Internet,” Information Society (14:3), 1998, pp. 229–245.
Monteiro, E., and Hanseth, O. “Social Shaping of Information Infrastructure,” in W.J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. Jones, and J.I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, London: Chapman & Hall, 1996.
Nambisan, S. “Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development,” MIS Quarterly (27:1), 2003, pp. 1–18.
Orlikowski, W.J. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science (3:3), 1992, pp. 398–429.
Orlikowski, J. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science (11:4), July–August 2000, pp. 404–428.
Orlikowski, W.J., and Baroudi, J.J. “Studying IT in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research (2:1), 1991, pp. 1–28.
Orlikowski, W.J., and Robey, D. “IT and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), 1991, pp. 143–169.
Rose, J., Jones, M., and Truex, D. “The Problem of Agency: How Humans Act, How Machines Act,” in ALOIS Workshop: Action in Language.Organizations and Information Systems, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2003, pp. 91–106.
Spencer, L.M., and Spencer, S.M. Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance, Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
Stamper, R. “Analyzing the Cultural-Impact of a System,” International Journal of Information Management (8:2), 1988, pp. 107–122.
Stamper, R. Information in Business and Administrative Systems, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973.
Stamper, R. “Signs, Information, Norms and Systems,” in B. Holmqvist, P.B. Andersen, H. Klein, and R. Posner (Eds.), Signs of Work, Berlin: Gruyte. 1996.
Stamper, R., Liu, K.C., Hafkamp, M., and Ades, Y. “Understanding the Roles of Signs and Norms in Organizations: A Semiotic Approach to Information Systems Design,” Behavior & Information Technology (19:1), 2000, pp. 15–27.
Star, S.L., and Ruhleder, K. “Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces,” Information Systems Research (7:1), 1996, pp. 111–34.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. Grounded Theory in Practice, London: Sage Publicatoins, 1997.
Truex, D., and Baskerville, R. “Deep Structure or Emergence Theory: Contrasting Theoretical Foundations for Information Systems Development,” Information Systems Journal (8:2), 1998, pp. 99–118.
Walsham, G. “The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research,” Information Systems Research (6:4), 1995a, pp. 376–394.
Walsham, G. “Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method,” European Journal of Information Systems (4), 1995b, pp. 74–81.
Wand, Y., and Weber, R. “On the Deep Structure of Information Systems,” Information Systems Journal (5:3), July 1995, pp. 203–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rose, J., Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O. (2004). Socio-Technical Structure: An Experiment in Integrative Theory Building. In: Kaplan, B., Truex, D.P., Wastell, D., Wood-Harper, A.T., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 143. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8094-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8095-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive