Skip to main content

Novel Strategies of Preventing Catheter-Related Infections in the ICU

  • Chapter
Catheter-Related Infections in the Critically Ill

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Critical Care Infectious Diseases ((CCID,volume 8))

  • 117 Accesses

Conclusions

CR-BSIs are not simply an acceptable consequence of central venous access and invasive monitoring. The false perception of invisible risk, the underestimation of individual responsibility, passive attitudes regarding the complexity of the process of care, and the financial constraints that contribute to understaffing play an important role in the failure to implement prevention strategies. Many CR-BSIs are preventable infections that need to be approached systematically at a multidisciplinary level that emphasizes patient safety and quality improvement. Taking advantage of new technology such as chlorehexidine for skin antisepsis, and antiseptic or antibiotic impregnated catheters, chlorehexidine impregnated dressings, may be a useful means of reducing catheter-related infections. What is not known is whether each technology contributes additively, synergistically, or not at all. In other words, does one need all of these strategies, or will one of them suffice? In the absence of data, it seems logical to utilize these strategies in a systematic way that incorporates performance measures to evaluate the impact that each intervention has in a given ICU setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. The evolving technology of venous access. N Engl J Med 1999;340:48–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimick JB, Pelz RK, Consunji R, Swoboda SM, Hendrix CW, Lipsett PA. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg 2001;136:229–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rello J, Ochagavia A, Sabanes E, Roque M, Mariscal D, Reynaga E, Valles J. Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1027–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heiselman D. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in the critically ill. JAMA 1994;272:1819–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992–June 2001, issued August 2001. Am J Infect Control 2001;in press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1990–May 1999, issued June 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:520–532.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schaberg DR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection. Am J Med 1991;91:72S–75S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1305–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mermel LA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. Am J Med 1991;91: 197S–205S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raad I, Costerton W, Sabharwal U, Sacilowski M, Anaissie E, Bodey GP. Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement. J Infect Dis 1993;168:400–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Locci R, Peters G, Pulverer G. Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices. IV. Scanning electron microscopy of intravenous catheters invaded by yeasts. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [B] 1981;173:419–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Locci R, Peters G, Pulverer G. Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices. I. Microtopographical characteristics of intravenous catheters as detected by scanning electron microscopy. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [B] 1981;173:285–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nachnani GH, Lessin LS, Motomiya T, Jensen WN, Bodey GP. Scanning electron microscopy of thrombogenesis on vascular catheter surfaces Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement. N Engl J Med 1972;286:139–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stillman RM, Soliman F, Garcia L, Sawyer PN. Etiology of catheter-associated sepsis. Correlation with thrombogenicity. Arch Surg 1977;112:1497–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eggimann P, Harbarth S, Constantin MN, Touveneau S, Chevrolet JC, Pittet D. Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care. Lancet 2000;355:1864–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy LM, Lipman TO. Central venous catheter care in parenteral nutrition: a review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987;11:190–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanders RA, Sheldon GF. Septic complications of total parenteral nutrition. A five year experience. Am J Surg 1976;132:214–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherertz RJ, Ely EW, Westbrook DM, Gledhill KS, Streed SA, Kiger B, Flynn L, Hayes S, Strong S, Cruz J, Bowton DL, Hulgan T, Haponik EF. Education of physicians-in-training can decrease the risk for vascular catheter infection. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:641–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nehme AE. Nutritional support of the hospitalized patient. The team concept. JAMA 1980;243:1906–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Soifer NE, Borzak S, Edlin BR, Weinstein RA. Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:473–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tomford JW, Hershey CO. The i.v. therapy team: impact on patient care and costs of hospitalization. NITA 1985;8:387–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1996;24:2053–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maki DG, Ringer M, Alvarado CJ. Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 1991;338:339–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Humar A, Ostromecki A, Direnfeld J, Marshall JC, Lazar N, Houston PC, Boiteau P, Conly JM. Prospective randomized trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central venous catheter infection. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:1001–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J, Abi-Said D, Gabrielli A, Hachem R, Wall M, Harris R, Jones J, Buzaid A, Robertson C, Shenaq S, Curling P, Burke T, Ericsson C. Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. A randomized, double-blind trial. The Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:267–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:391–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Veenstra DL, Saint S, Saha S, Lumley T, Sullivan SD. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1999;281:261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127:257–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Raad I, Darouiche R, Hachem R, Mansouri M, Bodey GP. The broad-spectrum activity and efficacy of catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin. J Infect Dis 1996;173:418–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bassetti S, Hu J, D’Agostino RB, Jr., Sherertz RJ. Prolonged antimicrobial activity of a catheter containing chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine extends protection against catheter infections in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:1535–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oda T, Hamasaki J, Kanda N, Mikami K. Anaphylactic shock induced by an antiseptic-coated central venous [correction of nervous] catheter. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1242–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Veenstra DL, Saint S, Sullivan SD. Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection. JAMA 1999;282:554–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Darouiche RO, Raad, II, Heard SO, Thornby JI, Wenker OC, Gabrielli A, Berg J, Khardori N, Hanna H, Hachem R, Harris RL, Mayhall G. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Levin A, Mason AJ, Jindal KK, Fong IW, Goldstein MB. Prevention of hemodialysis subclavian vein catheter infections by topical povidone-iodine. Kidney Int 1991;40:934–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Casewell MW. The nose: an underestimated source of Staphylococcus aureus causing wound infection. J Hosp Infect 1998;40:S3–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hill RL, Fisher AP, Ware RJ, Wilson S, Casewell MW. Mupirocin for the reduction of colonization of internal jugular cannulae—-a randomized controlled trial. J Hosp Infect 1990;15:311–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sesso R, Barbosa D, Leme IL, Sader H, Canziani ME, Manfredi S, Draibe S, Pignatari AC. Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis in hemodialysis patients using central venous catheter: effect of mupirocin ointment. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998;9:1085–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller MA, Dascal A, Portnoy J, Mendelson J. Development of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after widespread use of nasal mupirocin ointment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:811–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zakrzewska-Bode A, Muytjens HL, Liem KD, Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA. Mupirocin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci, after topical prophylaxis for the reduction of colonization of central venous catheters. J Hosp Infect 1995;31:189–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rao SP, Oreopoulos DG. Unusual complications of a polyurethane PD catheter. Perit Dial Int 1997;17:410–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Riu S, Ruiz CG, Martinez-Vea A, Peralta C, Oliver JA. Spontaneous rupture of polyurethane peritoneal catheter. A possible deleterious effect of mupirocin ointment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13:1870–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Maki DG, Band JD. A comparative study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointments in prevention of vascular catheter-related infection. Am J Med 1981;70:739–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Norden CW. Application of antibiotic ointment to the site of venous catheterization—-a controlled trial. J Infect Dis 1969;120:611–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zinner SH, Denny-Brown BC, Braun P, Burke JP, Toala P, Kass EH. Risk of infection with intravenous indwelling catheters: effect of application of antibiotic ointment. J Infect Dis 1969;120:616–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. N Engl J Med 2001;344:11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Carratala J, Niubo J, Femandez-Sevilla A, Juve E, Castellsague X, Berlanga J, Linares J, Gudiol F. Randomized, double-blind trial of an antibiotic-lock technique for prevention of gram-positive central venous catheter-related infection in neutropenic patients with cancer. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:2200–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Henrickson KJ, Axtell RA, Hoover SM, Kuhn SM, Pritchett J, Kehl SC, Klein JP. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections and thrombotic events in immunocompromised children by the use of vancomycin/ciprofloxacin/heparin flush solution: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1269–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Schwartz C, Henrickson KJ, Roghmann K, Powell K. Prevention of bacteremia attributed to luminal colonization of tunneled central venous catheters with vancomycin-susceptible organisms. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1591–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hoffmann KK, Weber DJ, Samsa GP, Rutala WA. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA 1992;267:2072–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Maki DG, Mermel LA, Klugar D, Narans L, Knasinski V, Parenteau S, Covington P. The efficacy of a chlorhexidine impregnated sponge (Biopatch) for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection-a prospective randomized controlled multicenter study. In: ICAAC. Toronto, Ontario, Canada:, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Garland JS, Alex CP, Mueller CD, Cisler-Kahill LA. Local reactions to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated antimicrobial dressing in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996;15:912–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Eyer S, Brummitt C, Crossley K, Siegel R, Cerra F. Catheter-related sepsis: prospective, randomized study of three methods of long-term catheter maintenance. Crit Care Med 1990;18:1073–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Uldall PR, Merchant N, Woods F, Yarworski U, Vas S. Changing subclavian haemodialysis cannulas to reduce infection. Lancet 1981;1:1373.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P, Cupido C, King D, Soukup C, Brun-Buisson C. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1417–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cobb DK, High KP, Sawyer RG, Sable CA, Adams RB, Lindley DA, Pruett TL, Schwenzer KJ, Farr BM. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1062–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Grady, N.P. (2004). Novel Strategies of Preventing Catheter-Related Infections in the ICU. In: O’Grady, N.P., Pittet, D. (eds) Catheter-Related Infections in the Critically Ill. Perspectives on Critical Care Infectious Diseases, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8010-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8010-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8009-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8010-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics