Abstract
A semi-analytical model has been developed for the estimation of the photoresponse of a photodiode-based CMOS active pixel sensor (APS). This model, based on a thorough analysis of experimental data, incorporates the effects of substrate diffusion as well as geometrical shape and size of the photodiode active area. It describes the dependence of pixel response on integration photocarriers and on conversion gain. The model also demonstrates that the tradeoff between these two conflicting factors gives rise to an optimum geometry, enabling the extraction of a maximum photoresponse. The dependence of the parameters on the process and design data is discussed, and the degree of accuracy for the photoresponse modeling is assessed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
O. Yadid-Pecht, B. Mansoorian, E. Fossum, and B. Pain, “Optimization of active pixel sensor noise and responsivity for scientific applications,” in Proc. IS&T/SPIE Symp. Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, San Jose, California, Feb. 1997.
O. Yadid-Pecht, R. Ginosar, and Y. Shacham-Diamand, “A random access photodiode array for intelligent image capture,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1772–1781, Aug. 1991.
E. Fossum, “Digital camera system on a chip,” IEEE Micro, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 8–15, May–June 1998.
H. Wong, “Technology and device scaling considerations for CMOS imagers,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2131–2142, Dec. 1996.
O. Yadid-Pecht, “CMOS imagers,” course notes, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel, 2000.
A. Moini, “Vision chips or seeing silicon: technical report,” Centre for High Performance Integrated Technologies and Systems, University of Adelaide, Mar. 1997. Available: www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/Groups/GAAS/Bugeye/visionchips/index.html
J. Hynecek, “BCMD — An improved photosite structure for high-density image sensors,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 38, ED-5, pp. 1011–1020, May 1991.
K. Matsumoto, I. Takayanagi, T. Nakamura, and R. Ohta, “The operation mechanism of a charge modulation device (CMD) image sensor,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 38, ED-5, pp. 989–998, May 1991.
S. Mendis, S. Kemeny, R. Gee, B. Pain, C. Staller, Q. Kim, and E. Fossum, “CMOS active pixel image sensors for highly integrated imaging systems,” IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, vol. 32, pp. 187–197, Feb. 1997.
P. Magnan, A. Gautrand, Y. Degerli, C. Marques, F. Lavernhe, C. Cavadore, F. Corbiere, J. Farre, O. Saint-Pe, M. Tulet, and R. Davancens, “Influence of pixel topology on performances of CMOS APS imagers,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 3965, 2000.
J. Bogaerts and B. Dierickx, “Total dose effects on CMOS active pixel sensors,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 3965, pp. 157–167, 2000.
H. Tian, B. Fowler, and A. El-Gamal, “Analysis of temporal noise in CMOS photodiode active pixel sensor,” IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, vol. 36, pp. 92–100, Jan. 2001.
H. Tian, X. Liu, S.H. Lim, S. Kleinfelder, and A. El-Gamal, “Active pixel sensors fabricated in a standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 4306, pp. 441–449, 2001.
J. P. Lavine, E. A. Trabka, B. C. Burkey, T. J. Tredwell, E. T. Nelson, and C. N. Anagnosyopoulos, “Steady-state photocarrier collection in silicon imaging devices,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 30, ED-9, pp. 1123–1134, Sept. 1983.
D. Kavaldjiev and Z. Ninkov, “Subpixel sensitivity map for a charge coupled device sensor,” Opt. Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 948–954, Mar. 1998.
J. S. Lee and R. I. Hornsey, “Photoresponse of photodiode arrays for solid-state image sensors,” J. Vacuum Sci. Technol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 621–625, Mar. 2000.
I. Shcherback and O. Yadid-Pecht, “CMOS APS MTF modeling,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 48, ED-12, pp. 2710–2715, Dec. 2001.
J. Tandon, D. Roulston, and S. Chamberlain, “Reverse-bias characteristics of a P+-N-N+ photodiode,” Solid-State Electron., vol. 15, pp. 669–685, Jun. 1972.
S. G. Chamberlain and D. H. Harper, “MTF simulation including transmittance effects of CCD,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 25, ED-2, pp. 145–154, 1978.
R. Stern, L. Shing, and M. Blouke, “Quantum efficiency measurements and modeling of ion-implanted, laser-annealed charge-coupled devices: X-ray, extreme ultraviolet, ultraviolet, and optical data,” Appl. Opt., vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 2521–2533, May 1994.
I. Shcherback and O. Yadid-Pecht, “CMOS APS MTF Modeling,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 48, ED-12, pp. 2710–2715, Dec. 2001.
B. Fowler, A. El-Gamal, D. Yang, and H. Tian, “A method for estimating quantum efficiency for CMOS image sensors,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 3301, pp. 178–185, 1998.
P. B. Catrysse, X. Liu, and A. El-Gamal, “QE reduction due to pixel vignetting in CMOS image sensors,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 3965, pp. 420–430, 2000.
O. Yadid-Pecht, “The geometrical modulation transfer function (MTF) for different pixel active area shapes,” Opt. Eng., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 859–865, 2000.
D. Ramey and J. T. Boyd, “Computer simulation of optical crosstalk in linear imaging arrays,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 17, pp. 553–556, Apr. 1981.
T. Lule, S. Benthien, H. Keller, F. Mutze, P. Rieve, K. Seibel, M. Sommer, and M. Bohm, “Sensitivity of CMOS-based imagers and scaling perspectives,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 47, ED-11, pp. 2710–2722, Nov. 2000.
H. Wong, “Technology and device scaling considerations for CMOS imagers,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2131–2142, Dec. 1996.
I. Shcherback and O. Yadid-Pecht, “Photoresponse analysis and pixel shape optimization for CMOS active pixel sensors,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices (Special Issue on Image Sensors), vol. 50, pp. 12–19, Jan. 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shcherback, I., Yadid-Pecht, O. (2004). Photoresponse Analysis and Pixel Shape Optimization for CMOS APS. In: Yadid-Pecht, O., Etienne-Cummings, R. (eds) CMOS Imagers. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7962-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7962-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7961-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7962-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive