This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashby, W.J. (1992). The variable use of on versus tu/vous. Journal of French Language Studies, 2, 135–157.
Atlani, F. (1984). On l’illusionniste. In A. Grésillon & J-L. Lebrave, (Eds.), La langue au ras du texte (pp. 13–29). Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Berman, R.A. (1980). The case of an (S)VO language: subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language, 56, 759–776.
Berman, R.A. (1993). Marking of verb transitivity by Hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 20, 641–669.
Berman, R.A. in press. Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics.
Berman, R.A., Ragnarsdóttir, H. & Strömqvist, S. (2002). Discourse stance. Written Language and Literacy 5, 255–289.
Berman, R.A. & Slobin, D.I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9, 93–124.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1990). Le français parlé: Etudes grammaticales. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1995). De la rareté de certains phénomènes syntaxiques en français parlé. French Language Studies 5, 17–29.
Budwig, Nancy. (1995). A developmental-functionalist approach to child language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Budwig, N. (2001). An exploration into children’s use of passives. In M. Tomasello & E. Bates (Eds.) Language development: The essentiel readings, 227–247. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Clark, E.V. (2001). Emergent categories in first language acquisition. In M. Bowerman & S.C. Levinson, (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 379–405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creissels, D. (1995). Eléments de syntaxe générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Croft, W. (1994). The semantics of subjecthood. In M. Yaguello, (ed.) Subjecthood and subjectivity: the status of the subject in linguistic theory, 29–75. Paris: Ophrys.
Jisa, H. & Kern, S. (1995). Discourse organisation in French children’s narratives. In E. V. Clark (ed.), The Proceedings of the 26th annual Child Language Research Forum. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jisa, H., Reilly, J., Verheoven, L., Baruch, E., & Rosado, E. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the use of passive constructions in written texts. Journal of Written Language and Literacy 5, 163–181.
Jisa, Harriet & Viguié, Anne. in press. A developmental perspective on the role of on in written and spoken expository texts. Journal of Pragmatics.
Jones, M.A. (1996). Foundations of French syntax. [Cambridge Textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kemmer, S. (1993). The middle voice. [Typological studies in language, 23.] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Klaiman, M.H. (1991). Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre. (1999). On a tué le président! The nature of passives and ultra-indefinites. In Barbara Fox, Dan Jurafsky and Laura A. Michaelis, (Eds.). Cognition and function in language (pp. 235–251). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kuno, S. (1972). Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic inquiry 3, 269–320.
Laberge, S. (1978). The changing distribution of indeterminate pronouns in discourse. In R.W. Shuy & W. Shnukal (Eds.), Language use and the use of language, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Laberge, S. & Sankoff, G. (1980). Anything you can do. In Gillian Sankoff (ed.) The social life of language (pp. 271–293). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. (1984). On the status of SVO sentences. In Russel S.T. (ed.) Coherence and grounding in discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. London: MIT Press.
Lyons, C. (1995). Voice, aspect and arbitrary arguments. In J. Charles Smith and M. Maiden (Eds.), Linguistic theory and the Romance languages (pp. 77–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Marchman, V.A., Bates, E., Burkardt, A., & Good, A.B. (1991). Functional constraints of the acquisition of the passive: Toward a model of the competence to perform. First Language 11, 65–92.
Ravid, D. & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy. Journal of Child Language 29, 417–447.
Ravid, D., van Hell, J., Rosado, E., & Zamora, A. (2002). Subject NP patterning in the development of text production. Written Language and Literacy 5, 69–94.
Reinhart, T. (1982). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Bloomiington, IN: Indiana University linguistics club.
Simonin, Jenny. (1984). Les répérages énonciatifs dans les textes de presse. In A. Grésillon & J.-L. Lebrave, (Eds.), La langue au ras du texte (pp. 133–203). Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Slobin, D.I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C.A. Ferguson & D.I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Slobin, Dan I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J.J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D.I. (2001). Form-function relations: how do children find out what they are? In M. Bowerman & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 406–449). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strömqvist, S., Johansson, V., Kriz, S., Ragnarsdóttir, H. & Ravid, D. (2002). Towards a crosslinguistic comparison of lexical quanta in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy 5, 45–67.
Tolchinsky, L. & Rosado, E. in press. Effect of age, modality, and text type on use of grammatical means for agency alternation. Journal of Pragmatics.
Vinay, J.-P. & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: An organismic developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jisa, H. (2005). Developing Alternatives for Indicating Discourse Stance. In: Ravid, D.D., Shyldkrot, H.BZ. (eds) Perspectives on Language and Language Development. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7903-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7911-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)