Skip to main content

Taxation, Production, and Redistribution

  • Chapter
Handbook of Public Finance

Abstract

In one sense the public choice revolution of the 20th century ocurred because economic and political analysis now routinely takes into account the incentives of political decision-makers, and recognizes that political decision-making can result in inefficiencies. In another sense, this public choice revolution is seriously incomplete, because while it has succeeded in producing a theory of government failure, it has not taken the next step to develop a framework for optimal public policy in light of the characteristics of collective decision-making. This chapter takes a step in that direction by sketching out optimal policies for taxation, production and redistribution, taking into account that these public policies are products of the political system. Public choice might be thought of as applying the tools of economics to analyze political decision-making. This chapter uses the results of public choice to redevelop the theory of public finance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, George A. (1978). “The Economics of ‘Tagging’ as Applied to the Optimal Income Tax, Welfare Programs, and Manpower Training.” American Economic Review 68 (1): 8–19.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Terry L. and Hill, Peter J. (1980). The Birth of a Transfer Society. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bator, Francis M. (1958). “The Anatomy of Market Failure.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 72: 351–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. (1983). “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (3): 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Bruce L. (1990). The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, Charles and Donaldson, David. (1988). “Cash Versus Kind, Self-Selection, and Efficient Transfers.” American Economic Review 78 (4): 691–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M. (1985). The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey and Lomasky, Loren. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Neil and Waldman, Michael. (1991). “Transfers in Kind: Why They Can Be Efficient and Nonpaternalistic.” American Economic Review 81 (5): 1345–1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. (1967), Public Finance in Democratic Process. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. (1975). “Public Finance and Public Choice.” National Tax Journal 28 (4): 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. (1976). “Taxation in Fiscal Exchange.” Journal of Public Economics 6 (1/2): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. and Tullock, Gordon. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, Walter and Winer, Stanley L. (1988). “Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure.” American Economic Review 78 (4): 701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, Robert. (1987). Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, Harold M. and Rodgers, James D. (1969). “Pareto Optimal Redistribution.” American Economic Review 59: 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1980).“A Contractarian Model of the Decline in Classical Liberalism.” Public Choice 35 (3): 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1985). An Economic Analysis of Democracy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1992). “The Distributive Model of Government: Evidence from the Confederate Constitution.” Southern Economic Journal 58 (3): 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1994). The Economic Foundations of Government. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1997a). “Selective Excise Taxation from an Interest Group Perspective.” In Taxing Choice: The Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination, Shughart, William F. II, ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1997b). “A Theory of the Theory of Public Goods.” Review of Austrian Economics 10 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1998). “Tax Policy from a Public Choice Perspective.” National Tax Journal 51 (2): 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Randall G. (1999). “Veterans Interests and the Transition to Government Growth: 1870–1915.” Public Choice 99 (3–4): 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuger, Anne O. (1974). “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.” American Economic Review 64 (3): 291–303.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, Erik. (1967). [orig. 1919]. “Just Taxation—A Positive Solution.” In Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Musgrave, Richard A. and Peacock, Alan T., eds. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasian, Jora. (1964). “Television Pricing and the Theory of Public Goods.” Journal of Law & Economics 7: 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, James A. (1971). “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 175–208.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, James A. (1976). “Optimal Tax Theory—A Synthesis.” Journal of Public Economics 6 (4): 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Richard A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank P. (1927). “A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation.” Economic Journal 37: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. (1973). For a New Liberty. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1954). “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1955). “A Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 37: 350–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1956). “Social Indifference Curves.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul A. (1973). Economics, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, Joel. (1990). “Optimal Taxation and Optimal Tax Systems.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (1): 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, Joel and Sorum, Nikki. (1984). “The Compliance Cost of the U.S. Individual Income Tax System.” National Tax Journal 37 (4): 461–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. (1937) [orig. 1776]. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. (1970). “Director’s Law of Public Income Redistribution.” Journal of Law & Economics 13(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, Charles M. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon. (1967). “The Welfare Cost of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft.” Western Economic Journal 5 (3): 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry, Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Johnsen, Christopher. (1981). The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 642–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, Knut. (1967) [orig. 1896]. “A New Principle of Just Taxation.” In Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Musgrave, Richard A. and Peacock, Alan T., eds. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, Stanley L. and Hettich, Walter. (1998). “What is Missed if We Leave Out Collective Choice in the Analysis of Taxation?” National Tax Journal 51 (2): 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, Donald. (1989). “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results.” Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1395–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holcombe, R.G. (2005). Taxation, Production, and Redistribution. In: Backhaus, J.G., Wagner, R.E. (eds) Handbook of Public Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7864-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics