Skip to main content

Society, State, and Public Finance: Setting the Analytical Stage

  • Chapter
Handbook of Public Finance

Abstract

Much of contemporary public finance can be described as being either Wicksellian or Edgeworthian in character. In the former, fiscal phenomena arise through complex processes of exchange; in the latter, they arise through acts of choice by some maximizing agent. This chapter traces these alternative orientations in the history of thought as far back as the Cameralists, compares these writers with Adam Smith, and contrasts the Wicksellian and Edgeworthian orientations toward public finance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Backhaus, Jürgen G. (1993). “The German Economic Tradition: From Cameralism to the Verein für Socialpolitik.” In Political Economy and National Realities, Albertone, Manuela and Masoero, Alberto, eds., pp. 329–356. Torino: Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Jürgen G. (1992). “The State as a Club: A Perspective for Public Finance in a Prosperous Democracy.” Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 10: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Jürgen G. (2002). “Old or New Public Finance? A Plea for the Tried and True.” Public Finance Review 30: 612–45.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Jürgen G. and Wagner, Richard E. (1987). “The Cameralists: A Public Choice Perspective. Public Choice 53: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M. (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1960). “The Italian Tradition in Fiscal Theory.” pp. 24–74 of his Fiscal Theory and Political Economy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Viti de Marco, Antonio. (1936). First Principles of Public Finance. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. Y. (1897). “The Pure Theory of Taxation.” In Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T., eds., pp. 119–136. London: Macmillan, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldvary, Fred. (1994). Public Goods and Private Communities. Hants, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, Richard. (1970). “Public Finance in the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences: A Review Article.” Journal of Economic Literature 8: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpert, Magdalene. (1937). Bibliographie der Kameralwissenschaften. Köln: Karl Schroeder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi, Johann. Heinrich Gottlob von. (1771). Natur und Wesen der Staaten. Darmstadt: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1969. [Reprint edition.]

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, Spencer H. (1970). The Art of Community. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1994). “Optimal Taxation and Government Finance.” In Modern Public Finance, Quigley, J. M. and Smolensky, E., eds., pp. 213–231. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1927). “A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation.” Economic Journal 37: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, Albion. (1909). The Cameralists: The Pioneers of German Social Polity. New York: Burt Franklin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, Keith. (1984). “Cameralism and the Science of Government.” Journal of Modern History 56: 263–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Adolf. (1883). Finanzwissenschaft, 3rd ed. Leipzig, C. F. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Richard E. (1997). “Choice, Exchange, and Public Finance.” American Economic Review, Proceedings 87: 160–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Richard E. (2002). “Some Institutional Problematics of Excess Burden Analytics.” Public Finance Review 30: 531–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, Knut. (1896). “A New Principle of Just Taxation.” In Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T., eds., pp. 72–118. London: Macmillan, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Backhaus, J.G., Wagner, R.E. (2005). Society, State, and Public Finance: Setting the Analytical Stage. In: Backhaus, J.G., Wagner, R.E. (eds) Handbook of Public Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7864-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics