Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valve Prosthesis — Patient Mismatch

How to assess it and is it really a clinical problem?

  • Chapter
Valve Surgery at the Turn of the Millennium

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 251))

  • 83 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58: 20–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker DK, Scotten LN. A database obtained from in vitro function testing of mechanical heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1994; 3: 561–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rashtian MY, Stevenson DM, Allen DT, Yoghanatan AP, Harrison EC, Edmiston WA, Faughan P, Rahimtoola SH. Flow characteristics of four commonly used mechanical valves. Am J Cardiol 1986;58: 743–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rashtian MY, Stevenson DM, Allen DT, Yoghanathan AP, Harrison EC, Edmiston WA, Rahimtoola SH. Flow characteristics ofbioprosthetic heart valves. Chest 1990; 98: 365–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greaves SC, Reimold CS, Lee RT, Cooke KA, Aranki SF. Preoperative prediction of prosthetic aortic valve annulus diameter by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Heart valve Dis 1995; 4: 14–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham TP, Kon ND, Nomeir AM, Cordell AR, Kitzman DW. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography in preoperative determination of aortic annulus size during valve replacement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 149–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, Edmunds LH, Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, McKay CR, Nishimura RA O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Rahimtoola SH. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management ofpatients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart

    Google Scholar 

  8. Association Task Force on pPractice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1486–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rahimtoola SH,. Editorial: Valve prosthesis-Patient mismatch: an update. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 207–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992; 6(suppl 1): S34–S38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 211–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 1996; 12: 379–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez J, Chen Ch, Laub G, Anderson WA, Brdlik OB, Murphy MM, McGrath LB. Predictive value of prosthetic vlave area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation 1996; 94(suppl II): II–109–II–112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. He GW, Grunkemeier GL, Gately HL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Up to thirthy-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 1056–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sawant D, Singh AK, Feng WC, Bert AA, Rotenberg F. St. Jude Medical cardiac valves in small aortic roots: follow-up to sixteen years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 499–509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kratz JM, Sade RM, Crawford FA, Crumbley III AJ, Stroud MR. The risk of small St. Jude aortic valveprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1114–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirooka K, Kawazoe K, Kosakai Y, Sasako Y, Eishi K, Kito Y, Nakanishi N, Yoshioka T, Kawashima Y Prediction of postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 1626–1630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Acuna JM, Femandez MV, Cendon AA, Fuentes VC, Garci-Bengoechea JB, Gil da la Pana M. Influenca of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventrciular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 273–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim EKW, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, Shub C. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994; 8: 293–297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, De Matteis GM, Caprara E, Tomai F, Penta de Peppo A, Pollisca P, Bassano C, Chiariello L. Extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with small size carbomedics aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 901–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, Di Bella I, De Gasperis C. Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 966–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, Fremes SE, Rao V, Cohen C, Borger MA, Weisel RD. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66:1198–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Travis BR, Heinrich RS, Ensley AE, Gibson DE, Hashim S, Yoganathan AP. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998; 7:345–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahimtoola SH, Murphy E. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. A long-term sequela. British Heart J 1981; 45: 331–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yazdanbakhsh AP, van den Brink RBA, Dekker E, de Mol BAJM. Small valve area index: its influence on early mortality after mitral valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 00 (2000) 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nudelman I, Schachner A, Levy MJ. Repeated mitral valve replacement in the growing child with congenital mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 79: 765–769.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lubiszewska B, Rozanski J, Szufladowicz M, Hoffman P, Ksiezycka E, Rydlewska-sadowska W, Ruzyllo W. Mechanical valve replacement in congenital heart disease in children. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 74–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Milano A, Vouché PR, Baillot-Vernant F, Donzeau-Gouge P, Trinquet F, Roux PM, Leca F, Neveux JY. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 92: 218–225.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Friedman S, Edmunds LH, Cuaso CC. Long-term mitral valve replacement in young children. Circulation 1978; 57: 981–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Didonato RM, Puga JF, Mair DD, Mc Goon DC. Late results after Starr-Edwards valve replacement in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 88: 583–589

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Dr. R.B.A. Van Den Brik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A.P. Yazdanbakhsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. B.A.J.M. De Mol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    C. H. Peels

  2. Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands

    L. H. B. Baur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Den Brik, R., Yazdanbakhsh, A., De Mol, B. (2004). Valve Prosthesis — Patient Mismatch. In: Peels, C.H., Baur, L.H.B. (eds) Valve Surgery at the Turn of the Millennium. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 251. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7848-X_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7848-X_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7834-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation