Skip to main content

Energy Myth Eight – Worldwide Power Systems are Economically and Environmentally Optimal

  • Chapter
Energy and American Society – Thirteen Myths

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alderfer, B., Eldridge, M. and Starrs, T.: 2000, Making Connections: Case Studies of Interconnection Barriers and their Impact on Distributed Power Projects, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, E.: 2006, Vague Law and Hard Lobbying Add Up to Billions for Big Oil, The NY Times, 3/27 (A), 1, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur D. Little: 2000, Preliminary Assessment of Battery Energy Storage and Fuel Dell Systems in Building Publications, Final Report to National Energy Technology Laboratory, US DOE, GS-23F-8003H, Acorn Park, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. Leslie W., and Warr, B.: 2003, Power and Work in the US Economy, 1900–1908, Energy, 28(3), 219–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. and Warr, B.: 2005, Accounting for Growth: The Role of Physical Work, Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 17(2), 181–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, O. and Worrell, E.: 2004, Clean Energy Technologies, A Preliminary Inventory of the Potential for Electricity Generation, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Timothy J., Palmer, Karen L., and Martinez, Salvador: 2002, Issues in Restructuring the Electricity Industry. Alternative Currents: Electricity and Public Policy, Resources for the Future, New York, pp. 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, George W.: April 27, 2005, Speech to National Small Business Conference, Washington Hilton Hotel, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casten, T. and Collins, M.: 2002, Recycling Energy, [online] http://www.primaryenergy.com, accessed July 16, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Edison: 2006, Con Edison 2005 Annual Report Strength, [online] http://investor.conedison.com/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=ed&script$=$700&layout=7, accessed July 23, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Research Institute’s Consortium for Electric Infrastructure to Support a Digital Society (CEIDS): [online] http://www.epri.com/IntelliGrid, accessed July 16, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration: 2005, Annual Energy Review 2004, DOE/EIA-0384(2004), Washington, DC (online) http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/, accessed June 21, 2006. Tables 1.3, 8.2a, 8.4a, 8.2a, Diagram 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entergy: 2006, 2005 Annual Report Tested, [online] http://www.entergy.com/content/investor_relations/ pdfs/2005ARFINAL.pdf, accessed July 23, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Eric: 2004, U.S. Transmission Capacity: Present Status and Future Prospects, Edison Electric Institute, [online] http://www.eei.org/industry_issues/energy_infrastructure/transmission/ USTransCapacity10-18-04.pdf, accessed July 23, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntoon, Steve and Metzner, Alexandra: 2003, The Myth of the Transmission Deficit, Public Utilities Fortnightly, 141(20), pp. 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency: 2002, World Energy Outlook 2002, Paris, France [online] http://www.iea.org//textbase/nppdf/free/2000/ weo2002.pdf, accessed June 21, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosanovic, D., Ambs, L., and Beebe, C.: 2005, The Influence of Distributed Energy Resources on the Hourly Clearing Price of Electricity in a Restructured Market, in 2005 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, West Point, NY, July 19–22, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosanovic, D. and Beebe, C.: 2005, System Wide Economic Benefits of Distributed Generation in the New England Energy Market, Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T.: 1979, The End of Liberalism, the Second Republic of the United States, WW Norton & Company, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering: 2006, Greatest Engineering Achievements of the 20th Century, 2nd Ed., National Academies, Washington, DC, http://www.greatachievements.org/, accessed July, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natu, S.: 2005, Bagasse Based Cogeneration, India Marching Ahead, International Sugar Journal, CVII, p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Electric Reliability Council: 2005, Long-Term Reliability Assessment: The Reliability of Bulk Electric Systems in North America, NAERC, Washington, DC, September, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company: 2006, Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet No. 17097-E, Commercial/Industrial/General Schedule E-20-Service to Customers with Maximum Demands of 1,000 kWh or more, Section 13. Contracts b. Long Term Service Agreement Options 3. Cogeneration Deferral Agreement, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primary Energy: 2006, [online] www.primaryenergy.com/facilities/cokenergy.htm, accessed July 16, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • REN21 Renewable Energy Policy Network: 2005, Renewable 2005 Global Status Report, Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, W: 2001, Distribution System Cost Methodologies for Distributed Generation, The Regulatory Assistance Project, Gardiner, Maine, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobin, Rodney: forthcoming, Renewable Energy Systems could never meet growing Electricity Demand in America, in B.K. Sovacool and M.A. Brown (eds) Energy and American Society: Thirteen Myths, Springer Press, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbosteam: [online] www.turbosteam.com, accessed July 16, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, B. and Ayres, R.: forthcoming 2006, The MEET-REXS model, Structural Change & Economic Dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Alliance for Decentralized Energy: 2005, [online] www.localpower.org/documents_pub/report_ worldsurvey05.pdf, accessed June 21, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerriffi, H.: 2004, Electric power systems under stress: an evaluation of centralized vs. distributed systems architectures, Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Casten, T.R., Ayres, R.U. (2007). Energy Myth Eight – Worldwide Power Systems are Economically and Environmentally Optimal. In: Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A. (eds) Energy and American Society – Thirteen Myths. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5564-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics