Skip to main content

Energy Myth Six – The Barriers to New and Innovative Energy Technologies are Primarily Technical: The Case of Distributed Generation (DG)

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alderfer, R. Brent and Starrs, Thomas J.: 2000, “Making Connections: Case Studies of Interconnection Barriers and Their Impact on Distributed Power Projects,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/SR-200-28053, NREL, Golden, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Anthony: 2002, “The Legal Impediments to Distributed Generation,” Energy Law Journal 23, pp. 505–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Wind Energy Association: 2004a, “Wind Group Says Loss of Tax Credits Stalls 1,000 MW,” Megawatt Daily 9 (6 January 2004), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Wind Energy Association: 2004b, “Tax Credit Expiration Hurting Wind Industry: AWEA,” Megawatt Daily 9 (13 May 2004), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, Peter: 1981, “Solar Electric Industry Worried Reagan Might Pull the Plug,” Washington Post, 29 September, p. D7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borbely, Ann-Marie and Kreider, Jan F.: 2001, Distributed Generation: The Power Paradigm for the New Millennium, CRC Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Marilyn A., Southworth, Frank, and Stovall, Theresa K.: 2005, “Towards a Climate-Friendly Built Environment,” Pew Center on Global Climate Change, [online] http://www.pewclimate.org/ global-warming-in-depth/all_reports/buildings/index.cfm, accessed June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Energy Commission: 1997, Renewables Program Committee, “Policy Report on AB 1890, Renewables Funding,” no date, but an accompanying letter was dated 7 March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capehart, Barney L., Mehta, Paul, and Turner, Wayne: 2003, “Distributed Generation and Your Energy Future.” Cogeneration and Distributed Generation Journal 18(4), pp. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, John: 1993, “Environmental Externalities in Electric Power Markets: Acid Rain, Urban Ozone, and Climate Change,” U.S. Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.doe.gov/ cneaf/pubs_html/rea/feature1.html, accessed June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casazza, John A. and Loehr, George C.: 2000, The Evolution of Electric Power Transmission Under Deregulation: Selected Readings, IEEE, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Ann, Schnoor, Barry, and Hamilton, Stephanie: 2001, Distributed Generation: A Nontechnical Guide, PenWell Publishers, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaurey, Akanksha, Ranganathan, Malini, and Mohanty, Parimita: 2004, “Electricity Access for Geographically Disadvantaged Rural Communities – Technology and Policy Insights,” Energy Policy 32, pp. 1693–1705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Harry and Pinch, Trevor: 1998, “The Naked Launch: Assigning Blame for the Challenger Explosion,” in Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch (eds) The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortada, James W.: 2003, The Digital Hand: How Computers Changed the Work of American Manufacturing, Transportation, and Retail Industries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Francis H. and Marston, Philip M.: 1999, “Paradigm Buster: Why Distributed Power will Rewrite the Open-Access Rules,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 137 (October 15), pp. 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Costa, A.: 1999, The Global Restructuring of the Steel Industry: Innovations, Institutions, and Industrial Change, Routledge, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electric Power Research Institute: 2003, Electricity Technology Roadmap: Meeting the Critical Challenges of the 21st Century, EPRI, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: 1995, “Promoting Wholesale Competition Through Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission Services by Public Utilities and Recovery of Stranded Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Docket Nos. RM95-8-000 and RM94-7-001, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fialka, John J.: 2006, “States Power Renewable-Energy Push,” Wall Street Journal, June 14, 20, p. B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flink, James M.: 1970, America Adopts the Automobile, 1895–1910, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flink, James M.: 1990, The Automobile Age, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Yal: 2006, Building Biotechnology: Starting, Managing, and Understanding Biotechnology, Thinkbiotech, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovando, Carol Ann: 1999, “Despite Banner Year, Wind Energy Faces Major Challenges,” Power 143 (November/December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goett, Andrew and Farmer, Richard: 2003, “Prospects for Distributed Electricity Generation: A CBO Paper”, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, R.L., West, C.D, and Fox, E.C.: 1981, The Electric Car – Is It Still the Vehicle of the Future? Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Stephen: 1986, “Solar Energy Industry Slips Into the Shadows; Fall in Oil Prices, Changes in Tax Rules Hurt Sales,” Washington Post (9 November), p. B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M.J.: 1990, “The Cinderella Options: A Study of Modernized Renewable Energy Options.” Energy Policy (July/August), pp. 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, Richard F.: 1989, Technology and Transformation in the American Electric Utility Industry, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, Richard F.: 1999, Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency: 2002, Distributed Generation in Liberalized Electricity Markets, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency: 2004, Renewable Energy: Market and Policy Trends in IEA Countries, IEA Publishing, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmis, Michael, Abiecunas, Jason, Alwang, Jeffrey, Aultman, Stephen, Bird, Lori, Denholm, Paul, Heimiller, Donna, Hirsh, Richard F., Milbrandt, Anelia, Pletka, Ryan, Porro, Gian, and Sovacool, Benjamin K.: 2005, A Study of Increased Use of Renewable Energy Resources in Virginia, Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research, Blacksburg, VA, [online] http://www.energy.vt.edu/ Publications/Incr_Use_Renew_Energy_VA_rev1.pdf, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, David A.: 2000, The Electric Vehicle and the Burden of History, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolanowski, Bernard F.: 2000, Small-Scale Cogeneration Handbook, The Fairmont Press, Liburn, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, Sarah and Lewandowski, Allan: 2004, “Recent Progress and Future Potential for Concentrating Photovoltaic Power Systems.” Report to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, [online] http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/36330.pdf, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learner, Howard A.: 2001, “Cleaning, Greening, and Modernizing the Electric Power Sector in the Twenty-First Century,” Tulane Environmental Law Journal 14, pp. 277–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, William E.: 1999, GRI Technical Paper: Natural Gas Power Systems for the Distributed Generation Market, Power-Gen International, New Orleans, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, Amory, Datta, E. Kyle, Feiler, Thomas, Lehmann, Andre, Rabago, Karl, Swisher, Joel, and Wicker, Ken: 2002, Small is Profitable: The Hidden Benefits of Making Electrical Resources the Right Size, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, Michael T. and Brough, Wayne: 1999, Promise for the Future, Penalties From the Past: The Nature and Causes of Stranded Costs in the Electric Industry, Citizens for a Sound Energy Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Gilbert M.: 2004, Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems, Wiley and Sons, London, UK, p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCraw, Thomas K.: 1984, Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn, Belknap Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, James, Burtraw, Dallas, Darmstadter, Joel, and Palmer, Karen: 1999, “Winner, Loser, or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed as Expected?” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 99–28 (June), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moms, Gijs P.A. and Kirsch, David A.: 2001, “Technologies in Tension Horses: Electric Trucks and the Motorization of American Cities, 1900–1925,” Technology & Culture 42, pp. 489–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muljadi, E., Wang, C., and Nehrir, M.H.: 2004, “Parallel Operation of Wind Turbine, Fuel Cell, and Diesel Generation Sources.” Presentation at the IEEE-Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Denver, Colorado, June 6–10, 2004, [online] http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/35353.pdf, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, Steven: 2001, “National Energy Policy: Conservation and Energy Efficiency,” Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce (June 22), pp. 53–54, [online] http://energycommerce.house.gov/107/hearings/ 06222001Hearing265/hearing.htm, accessed July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Energy Policy: 2004, “Ending the Energy Stalemate: A Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America’s Energy Challenges,” [online] http://www.rff.org/rff/Events/loader.cfm?url=/ commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID$=$18167, accessed on June 21, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory: 2006, “PV Manufacturing R&D,” [online] http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/pv_manufacturing/cost_capacity.html, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Power Planning Council: 2002, “Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants.” New Resource Characterization for the Fifth Power Plan, [online] http://www.westgov.org/wieb/electric/ Transmission%20Protocol/SSG-WI/pnw_5pp_02.pdf, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, David E.: 1999, Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies, MIT Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, Brian: 2005, “Power Generation Resource Incentives and Diversity” Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the U.S. Senate (May 8), Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, National Energy Policy Development Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepermans, Guido, Driesen, Johan, and Haelseldonckx, Dries: 2003, “Distributed Generation: Definition, Benefits, and Issues.” Energy Policy (August), pp. 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersik, Thomas: 2004, State Renewable Energy Requirements and Goals: Status Through 2003, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • PJM Interconnection LLC: 2005, “OATT Attachment Feasibility Study Agreement Form,” 2005, [online] http://www.pjm.com/planning/expansion-planning/form-oatt-feas-study.html, accessed July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, John B.: 1955, “The Electric Vehicle Company: A Monopoly That Missed,” Business History Review 29(4), pp. 298–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Ari and Becker, Fredric: 2003, Wind Energy for Electric Power: A REEP Issue Brief. Renewable Energy Policy Project, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Ian F. and Ambs, Lawrence L.: 2004, “Incorporating Externalities into a Full Cost Approach to Electric Power Generation Life-cycle Costing,” Energy 29, pp. 2125–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagrillo, Mick. “Wind System Operations and Maintenance Costs.” American Wind Energy Association Technical Information Brief, February, 2002, [online] http://www.awea.org/faq/sagrillo/ ms_OandM_0212.html, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheer, Hermann: 2001, A Solar Manifesto: The Need for a Total Energy Supply and How to Achieve It, Earthscan Publications, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rebecca: 2004, “Not Just Tilting Anymore,” Wall Street Journal (October 14), C1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, Benjamin K.: 2006, “The Power Production Paradox: Revealing the Socio-technical Impediments to Distributed Generation Technologies,” Ph.D. Thesis, Science and Technology Studies Department, Virginian Tech, Doctoral Dissertation, Blacksburg, VA, [online] http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ theses/available/etd-04202006-172936/, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrs, Thomas J.: 2001, “National Electricity Policy: Barriers to Competitive Generation,” Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality House Committee on Energy and Commerce, July 27, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavros, Richard: 1999, “Distributed Generation: Last Big Battle for State Regulators?” Public Utilities Fortnightly 137 (October 15), pp. 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Jerry and Van Doren, Peter: 2002, “Evaluating the Case for Renewable Energy: Is Government Support Warranted?” Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 422. January 10, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Combined Heat and Power Association: 2006, “CHP Technology and Applications,” [online] http://uschpa.admgt.com/techapps.htm, accessed July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy: 2006, “Department of Energy Requests {$}23.6 Billion for FY 2007” [online] http://www.energy.gov/news/3150.htm, accessed February 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration: 2005, “Existing Capacity by Producer Type,” [online] http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat2p3.html, accessed July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office: 2005, “National Energy Policy: Inventory of Major Federal Energy Programs and Status of Policy Recommendations,” United States GAO Report to Congress, (GAO-05-379) GAO, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, James C.: 2001, “Strictly Business: Notes on Deregulating Electricity,” Technology & Culture 42, pp. 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, H. Lee and Scott, Walter G.: 2000, Distributed Power Generation: Planning and Evaluation, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, R., Pickle, S., and Goldman, C.: 1996, “California Renewable Energy Policy and Implementation Issues – An Overview of Recent Regulatory and Legislative Action,” Report LBNL-39247, UC-1321, [online] http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/emp/reports/39247.pdf, accessed July 14, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, Ryan, Bolinger, Mark, and St. Clair, Matt: 2005, Easing the Natural Gas Crisis: Reducing Natural Gas Prices Through Increased Deployment of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, LBNL-56756, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavadil, Robert and McGranaghan, Mark: 2002, “Working Group Struggles with DG Interconnection Standard.” EC&M, [online] http://www.powerquality.com/mag/power_working_group_strugges/, accessed March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sovacool, B.K., Hirsh, R.F. (2007). Energy Myth Six – The Barriers to New and Innovative Energy Technologies are Primarily Technical: The Case of Distributed Generation (DG). In: Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A. (eds) Energy and American Society – Thirteen Myths. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5564-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics