Abstract
Twenty facultative Argentinean commercial wheat cultivars classified as early and late maturity were grown during 2004 and exposed to different sowing dates from June to September under field conditions with the aim of establish how the duration of different pre-and post-flowering phases are affected when plants are exposed to a wide range of temperature and photoperiod regimes. The changes in the duration of the emergence-anthesis phase, measured in thermal time, between early and late maturity groups were mainly associated with differences in the photoperiod sensitivity (in average 74 and 165 ˆ C d h-1 for early and late maturity groups, respectively) without significant differences in the optimum photoperiod (13.4 hs) and/or intrinsic earliness (in average 829 and 907 ˆ C d for early and late maturity groups, respectively). Similar responses were observed in the two pre-anthesis phases analyzed. Because of only three cultivars evidenced vernalization requirements this trait seems not appear as an important attribute to be considered by breeding into the Argentinean commercial cultivars, with the aim of lengthening to the pre anthesis phases. The duration of the post-anthesis phase was less variable not only among cultivars, also between early and late maturity groups with an average duration of 450 ˆ C d. The data obtained from this study allowed the construction of thermo-photoperiodic models and include this information into friendly software named CRONOTRIGO © (www.agro.uba.ar/catedras/cerealicultura/servicios.htm) for predicting the timing of phenological events as the beginning of stem elongation, flowering and physiological maturity
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fischer RA (1993) Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertilizer. II. Physiology of grain and yield response. Field Crop Res 33:57–80
Gonzalez FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ (2005a) Floret development and survival in wheat plants exposed to contrasting photperiod and radiation environments during stem elongation. Funct Plant Biol 32:189–197
Gonzalez FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ (2005b) Pre-anthesis development and number of fertile florets in wheat as affected by photoperiod sensitivity genes Ppd-D1 and Ppd-B. Euphytica 146:253–269
Hotsonyame GK, Hunt LA (1997) Sowing date and photoperiod effects on leaf appearance in field-grown wheat. Can J Plant Sci 77:23–31
Jamieson PD, Brooking IR, Porter JR, Wilson DR (1995) Prediction of leaf appearance in wheat: a question of temperature. Field Crop Res 41:35–44
Kiniry JR, Ritchie JT, Musser RL (1983) Dynamic nature of photoperiod response in maiza. Agron J 75:700–703
Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (1999) Wheat development. In: Satorre EH, Slafer GA (eds) Wheat: Ecology and physiology of yield determination. Food Product Press Ed New York pp 13–14.
Miralles DJ, Richards RA (2000) Responses of leaf and tiller emergence and primordium initiation in wheat and barley to interchanged photoperiod. Ann Bot 85:655–663
Miralles DJ, Richards RA, Slafer GA (2000) Duration of stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:931–940
Miralles DJ, Ferro BC, Slafer GA (2001) Developmental responses to sowing date in wheat, barley and rapeseed. Field Crop Res 71:211–223
Rawson HM (1971) An upper limit for spikelet number per ear in wheat as controlled by photoperiod. Aust J Agr Res 22:537–546
Riddell JA, Gries GA, Stearns FW (1958) Development of spring wheat: I. The effect of photoperiod. Agron J 50:735–739
Slafer GA, Rawson HM (1994) Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:393–426
Slafer GA, Rawson HM (1996) Responses to photoperiod change with phenophase and temperature during wheat development. Field Crop Res 46:1–13
Whitechurch EM, Slafer GA (2001) Response to photoperiod before and after jointing in wheat substitution lines. Euphytica 118:47–51
Whitechurch EM, Slafer GA (2002) Contrasting Ppd alleles in wheat: effects on sensitivity to photoperiod in different phases. Field Crop Res 73:95–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Miralles, D.J., Spinedi, M.V., Abeledo, L.G., Abelleyra, D. (2007). Variability on Photoperiod Responses in Argentinean Wheat Cultivars Differing in Length of Crop Cycle. In: Buck, H.T., Nisi, J.E., Salomón, N. (eds) Wheat Production in Stressed Environments. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_72
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5496-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5497-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)