Advertisement

Evaluation and Planning of Wildlife Habitat in Urban Landscape

  • Y. Natuhara
Chapter

Abstract

We compared the response of various taxonomic groups, birds, butterflies, ants, trees and ferns, in the large city of Osaka, Japan in order to examine relationships between the abundance and arrangement of the habitats, and life history trait of the species. We presented species specific responses to habitat fragmentation. Species richness decreased more rapidly in birds than ants from the urban to rural ends of the urban gradient, and butterflies were intermediate. Birds were influenced by the habitat area and distance to species source. In contrast, ants were less influenced by habitat area, but were susceptible to the history of the isolated habitats. In ants, trees and ferns, some rare species occurred even in small habitats and the small habitats contributed to species diversity in the urban areas. Simultaneously, variation of the life history affected the distribution of species. For example, Parus majorcould breed in urban area by using scattered trees in an urban matrix; their home range enlarged in the urban area to secure sufficient food. One of the major goals of urban landscape ecology is to use scientific information to restore and preserve biodiversity in urban ecosystems. Some examples of planning and adaptive management for wildlife habitats in urban landscapes were introduced

Keywords

Species Richness Tidal Flat Tree Cover Adaptive Management Urban Landscape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambuel, B. and Temple, S.A. (1983). Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology, 64, 1057-1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki, J. (1979). Difference in sensitivities of oribatid families to environmental change by human impacts. Revue D’Ecologie et de Biologie du Sol., 16, 415-422Google Scholar
  3. Askins, R.A., Philbrick, M.J. and Sugeno, D.S. (1987). Relationship between the regional abundance of forest and the composition of forest bird communities. Biological Conservation, 39, 129-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair, R.B. (1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications, 6, 506-519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, J.G. (1991). Nested subsets and the distribution of birds on isolated forest. Conservation Biology, 5, 58-66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boecklen, W.J. and Gotelli, N.J. (1984). Island biogeographic theory and conservation practice: speciesarea or specious-area relationships. Biological Conservation, v>29, 63-80.Google Scholar
  7. Bolger, D.T., Alberts, A.C. and Soule, M.E. (1991). Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: Sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. American Naturalist, 137, 155-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boumans, R.M.J., Burdick, D.M. and Dionne, M. (2002). Modeling habitat change in salt marshes after tidal restoration. Restoration Ecology,10, 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canaday, C. (1997). Loss of insectivorous birds along a gradient of human impact in Amazonia. Biological Conservation, 77, 63-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiba, S. (1973). Changes in animals habitats and their retreat in Tokyo. Natural Science and Museum, 40, 69-73Google Scholar
  11. Chikamatsu, M., Natuhara, Y., Mizutani, Y. and Nakamura, A. (2002). Effect of artificial gaps on the butterfly assemblage in urban woods. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 28, 97-102 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  12. Debinski, D.M., Ray, C. and Saveraid, E.H. (2001). Species diversity and the scale of the landscape mosaic: do scales of movement and patch size affect diversity? Biological Conservation, 98, 179-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forman, R.T.T. (1995). Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Region and Landscape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Fukamachi, K., Oku, H. and Nakashizuka, T. (2001). The change of a satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan between 1970 and 1995. Landscape Ecology, 16, 703-717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuller, R.J., Stuttard, P. and Ray, M. (1989). The distribution of breeding songbirds within mixed coppiced forest in Kent, England, in relation to vegetation age and structure. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 26, 265-275Google Scholar
  16. Gaston, K.J., Smith, R.M., Thompson, K. and Warren, P.H. (2005). Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation14, 395-413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goto, S., Morioka, T. and Fujita, S. (1999). Evaluation of ecological networks in urban area by habitat analysis of indicator species. Environmental Information Science, 13, 43-48Google Scholar
  18. Haila, Y., Hanski, I.K. and Raivio, S. (1993). Turnover of breeding birds in small forest fragments: The "sampling" colonization hypothesis corroborated. Ecology, 74, 714-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamabata, E. (1980). Changes of herb-layer species composition with urbanization in secondary oak forests of Musashino plain near Tokyo – Studies on the conservation of suburban forest stands 1. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 30, 347-358 (in Japanese with English Abstract)Google Scholar
  20. Hansen, A.J. and Urban, D.L. (1992). Avian response to landscape pattern: The role of species life histories. Landscape Ecology, 7, 163-180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanski, I. and Gyllenberg, M. (1997). Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science, 275, 397-400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansson, L. (1979). On the importance of landscape heterogeneity in northern regions for the breeding population densities of homeotherms: a general hypothesis. Oikos, 33, 182-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasebe, H. and Suzuki, M. (1997). GIS analysis of open space transition in urbanization process of Edo- Tokyo. Journal of Japan Institute of Landscape Architecture, 60, 633-638 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  24. Hashimoto, H., Murakami, K. and Morimoto, Y. (2005a). Relative species - area relationship and nestedness pattern of forest birds in urban area of Kyoto City. Landscape Ecology and Management 10, 25-36. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  25. Hashimoto, H., Natuhara, Y. and Morimoto, Y. (2005b). A habitat model for Great Tits, Parus major minor, using a logistic regression model in the urban area of Osaka, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 245-250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hashimoto, Y., Kamihogi, A. and Hattori, T. (1994). A study on the conservation of fragmented forests as inhabitant arthropods in the new town, using ant-biodiversity for indicator as arthropods-biodiversity. Journal of Japan Institute of Landscape Architecture, 57, 223-228 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. Hattori, T., Kamihogi, A., Kodate, S., Kumadaki, E., Fujii, T. and Takeda, Y. (1994). A study on the actual conditions of the fragmented forests in flower town and their conservation. Journal of Japan Institute of Landscape Architecture, 57, 217-222 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. Helle, P. and Muona, J. (1985). Invertebrate numbers in edges between clear-fellings and mature forests in northern Finland. Silva Fennica, 19, 281-294.Google Scholar
  29. Higuchi, H., Tsukamoto, Y., Hanawa, S. and Takeda, M. (1982). Relationship between forest areas and the number of bird species. Strix, 1, 70-78 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  30. Hogsden, K.L. and Hutchinson, T.C. (2004). Butterfly assemblages along a human disturbance gradient in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 82, 739-748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holling, C.S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Management and Assessment. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  32. Hotta, M. (1977). Distribution of Taraxacum spp. in Kinki District, Japan. Bulletin of Osaka Museum of Natural History, 1(12), 117-134 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  33. Howe, R.W. (1984). Local dynamics of bird assemblages in small forest habitat islands in Australia and North America. Ecology, 65, 1585-1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ichinose, T. and Katoh, K. (1994). The factors that influenced bird communities on the fragmented woodlots in the Tokorozawa City, Saitama Prefecture. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 57, 235-240.Google Scholar
  35. Ide, H. and Kameyama, A. (1993). Landscape Ecology. Asakura-shoten, Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  36. Imai, C. and Natuhara, Y. (1996). Comparison of butterfly fauna among urban greeneries in and around Osaka City and an application to island biogeography theory. Japanese Journal of Environmental Entomology and Zoology, 8, 23-34. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  37. Inoue, N., Natuhara, Y. and Hashimoto, H. (2005). The effect of percentage of tree cover on breeding performance of Great tit (Parus major). Landscape Ecology and Management, 9(2), 33-39. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  38. Lancaster, R.K. and Rees, W.E. (1979). Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57, 2358-2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacArthur, R. and MacArthur, J. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594-598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDonnell, M.J. and Pickett, S.T.A. (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 71, 1232-1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport of Japan (2004). http://www.mlit.go.jp/kisha/kisha04/02/020315/02.pdf (accessed September 15, 2005)
  42. Murakami, K., Matsui, R., Maenaka, H. and Morimoto, Y. (2003). Relationship between species composition of Pteridophytes and micro-landform types in fragmented forest patches in Kyoto City area. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 66, 513-516. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  43. Murakami, K. and Morimoto, Y. (2000). Landscape ecological study on the woody plant species richness and its conservation in fragmented forest patches in Kyoto City area. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 25, 345-350 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  44. Nakamura, A, Morimoto, Y. and Mizutani, Y. (2005). Adaptive management approach to increasing the diversity of a 30-year-old planted forest in an urban area of Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 291-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakamura, N. (1988). Mori to Tori to (Forests and birds). Shinano Mainichi Shinbunsha, Nagano. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  46. Natuhara, Y. (1998). Ant faunae in Osaka City and three other sites in Osaka Prefecture. Bulletin of Myrmecological Society of Japan, 22, 1-5. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  47. Natuhara, Y. (2000). Changes in butterfly assemblage along the urban-forest gradient. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 63, 515-518. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  48. Natuhara, Y. and Imai, C. (1996). Spatial structure of avifauna along urban-rural gradients. Ecological Research, 11, 1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Natuhara, Y. and Imai, C. (1999). Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 239-253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Natuhara, Y. Imai, C. and Takahashi, M. (1999). Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan. Ecological Research, 14, 105-118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Natuhara, Y., Kitano, M., Goto, K., Tsuchinaga, T., Imai, C., Tsuruho, K. and Takada, H. (2005). Creation and adaptive management of a wild bird habitat on reclaimed land in Osaka Port. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 283-290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Numata, M. (1976). Methodology of urban ecosystem studies. In Science for Better Environment. Proceeding of the International Congress on the Human Environment (1975, Kyoto, pp. 221-228). HESC, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  53. Numata, M. (1982). Changes in ecosystem structure and function in Tokyo. In Bornkamm, R., J.A. Lee and M.R.D. Seaward (Eds.), Urban Ecology (pp. 139-147). Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  54. Ochi, S, Ikegami, Y. and Nakagoshi N. (2000). Analysing landscape change at patch level on urbanizing region. Journal of Japan Institute of Landscape Architecture, 63, 775-778Google Scholar
  55. Opdam, P., van Dorp, D. and ter Braak, C.J.F. (1984). The effect of isolation on the number of forest birds in small woods in the Netherlands. Journal of Biogeography, 11, 473-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Patterson, B.D. and Atmar, W. (1986). Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28, 65-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peintinger, M., Bergamini, A. and Schmid, B. (2003). Species-area relationships and nestedness of four taxonomic groups in fragmented wetlands. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 385-394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pollard, E. and Yates, T.J. (1993). Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  59. Simberloff, D.S. and Abele, L.G. (1976). Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 121, 285-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Soule, M.E., Bolger, D.T. Alberts, A.C., Wright, J., Sorice, M. and Hill, S. (1988). Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral-requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology, 2, 75-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taoda, H. (1973). Bryo-meter, an instrument for measuring the phytotoxic air pollution. Hikobia, 6, 224- 228.Google Scholar
  62. Toyama, M. and Nakagoshi, N. (1994). A study on structure of urban greenery spaces and inhabitant ants. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology 20, 13-20. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  63. Vale, T.R. and Vale, G.R. (1976). Suburban bird populations in west-central California. Journal of Biogeography, 3, 157-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warren, M.S. (1987). The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 499-513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Willis, E.O. (1979). The composition of avian communities in ramanescent woodlots in southern Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia (Sao Paulo), 33, 1-25.Google Scholar
  66. With, K.A., Gardner, R.H. and Turner, M.G. (1997). Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos, 78, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wood, B.C. and Pullin, A.S. (2002). Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 1451-1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yabe, K., Yoshida, K. and Kaneko, M. (1998). Effects of urbanization on the flora of open space in Sapporo City. Journal of Japan Institute of Landscape Architecture, 61, 571-576 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  69. Yahner, R.H. (1988). Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conservation Biology, 2, 333-339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yamamoto, K. and Natuhara, Y. (2005). The change of butterfly assemblages after artificial gap formation in an urban park. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 68, 585-588.Google Scholar
  71. Yokohari, M. and Fukuhara, M. (1988). Analysis of mixed land use in urban fringe using Landsat TM data. Journal of Japan Institute of Landscape Architecture, 51, 335-340 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  72. Yui, A., Natuhara, Y., Murakami, K. and Morimoto, Y. (2001). Factors influence the species richness of ants in urban woods. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 27, 78-83. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Natuhara
    • 1
  1. 1.Osaka Prefecture UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations