Land Use Change From Traditional To Modern Eras: Saitama Prefecture, Japan

  • R. Seguchi
  • R. D. Brown
  • K. Takeuchi


This study investigated changes in land use from the traditional era(1880s) to the modern era (1990s) in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Shortly after Japan opened their country to foreign trade, but before outside influence had affected land use, the first mapped survey of Japan was undertaken. These original 1880s maps, which revealed traditional land use patterns, were compared with modern land use through geographic information system analysis. The amount of paddy field remained essentially unchanged between the 1880s and the 1990s, but forest vegetation decreased from 39% to 20%, and urban development land increased from 5% to 24% of the area. A comparison of land use change on each landform type indicated that land use patterns were determined more by the capability of the land in the 1880s than in the 1990s. An analysis of the transition in vegetation revealed that natural succession was underway in much of the woodland


Paddy Field Forest Vegetation Natural Levee Geographic Information System Analysis Geographical Survey Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bessho, H., Tsunekawa, A. and Takeuchi, K. (2001). Tamakyuryo Tsurumigawa ryuiki ni okeru GIS wo mochiita Satoyama no shokuseihenka(A study on vegetation change of Satoyama in the basin of Tsurumiriver, Tama hills by using GIS). Theory and applications of GIS, 9(2), 83-90. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  2. Buckley, G.P. (1995). Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands. Chapman & Hall, London, 336pp.Google Scholar
  3. Geographical Survey Institute. (1991). Meiji zenki tegaki saishoku Kanto kansokuzu, Shiryohen (Manually Rendered Survey Map of Kanto of the Early Meiji, Attachment material). Japan Map Center, Tokyo, 253pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  4. Harada, H. and Isogai, T. (2000). Matsu to Shii(Pinusand Castanopsis cuspidate). Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo, 106pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  5. Higuchi, H. (1996). Hozenseibutsugaku(Conservation Biology). University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 253pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Ichikawa, K., Okubo, N., Okubo, S. and Takecuhi, K. (in press) Transition of the satoyamalandscape in the urban fringe of the Tokyo metropolitan area from 1880 to 2001. Landscape and Urban Planning. Google Scholar
  7. Ishizaka, T., Takeuchi, K., Okazaki, M. and Yoshinaga, S. (1986). Kita Hikikyuryo ni okeru chikei, dojou no hairetsu to shokusei bunpu(Vegetation distribution influenced by the landform and soil arrangement in the Hiki-kita Hills, Saitama Prefecture, Central Japan). Applied Phytosociology, 15, 1-16. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Japanese Ministry of the Environment (formerly The Japanese Environment Agency), Nature Conservation Bureau. (1999). The Dataset for GIS on the Natural Environment, Japan ver.2 (CD Rom)Google Scholar
  9. Kameyama, A. (1996). Zoukibayashi no shokuseikanri(Vegetation Management of Coppice). Softscience, Tokyo, 303pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  10. Matsui, K., Takeuchi, K. and Tamura, T. (1990). Kyuryochi no shizenkankyou: sono tokusei to hozen (Natural Environment of the Hills : It’s Character and Conservation). Kokon Shoin, Tokyo, 202pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Miyawaki, A., Okuda, S. and Inoue, K. (1975). Saitamaken nanseibu no shokusei(Vegetation of South- Eastern Saitama). Saitama Prefecture, 86pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Nagaoka, M. (1991). Meijizenki no tegaki saishoku Kanto kansokuzu – Daiichigunkan chihou nimanbun no ichi jinsokusokuzu kaidai (Manual survey maps of Kanto area in the early Meiji Era – Reading Jinsokusokuzu1:20,000). Journal of The Geographical Survey Institute, 74, 22-32. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Ogura, J. (1993). Meiji chuki ni okeru Bousoukyuuryou no shokuseikeikan (Vegetation of the Hills of the Boso Penninsula in the Middle Meiji Era). Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 56(5), 25-30. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Ogura, J. (1994). Meiji 10 nendai ni okeru Kantochiho no shinrinkeikan (Forests of the Kanto Region in the 1880s). Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 57(5), 79-84. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Saitama Prefecture. (1974). Fundamental Land Classification Survey, Kuma gaya. Saitama Prefecture, Urawa. 51pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Sprague, D.S., Goto, T. and Moriyama, H. (2000). Jinsokusokuzu no GIS kaiseki ni yoru Meiji shoki no nouson tochiriyou no bunseki (GIS Analysis Using the Rapid Survey Map of Traditional Agricultural Land Use in the Early Meiji Era). Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 63(5), 771-774. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Suminami, Y. (1998). Ryokuchihozenseido to satoyama (Satoyama in Conservation System of Open Space). Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 61(4), 290-292. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Yokohari, M. (2003) Satoyama: The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan, Springer, Tokyo, New York. 229 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Seguchi
    • 1
  • R. D. Brown
    • 1
  • K. Takeuchi
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Environmental Design and Rural DevelopmentUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada N1G 2W1
  2. 2.Laboratory of Landscape Ecology and PlanningThe University of TokyoYayoi 1-1-1 Bunkyo-Ku113 Japan

Personalised recommendations