Advertisement

Challenges Faced When Creating an Evaluation Method of Biodiversity on an Ecosystem Level

  • J. Morimoto
Chapter
  • 2.6k Downloads

Abstract

In order to create an accurate evaluation method that properly reflects the value of biodiversity on an ecosystem level, the current and past studies of such methods must be analysed. Biodiversity evaluation models published in journals from 1995 to 2005 were studied and was concluded that in order to create an accurate model, the following four elements need to be included: the first, species from different guilds that maximize the phylogenetic diversity, as surrogates of the ecosystem should be included. Secondly, assess the extinction probability of the selected species by Population Viability Analysis. Thirdly, identify the potential habitat area of selected species by Potential Habitat Analysis. Fifthly, estimate the survival probability of the selected species in the potential habitat area.

Keywords

Ecosystem Service Structural Aspect Phylogenetic Diversity Ecosystem Level Potential Habitat 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez-Buylla, E.R., Garcia-Barrions, R., Lara-Moreno, C. and Martinez-Ramos, M. (1996). Demographic and genetic models in conservation biology: Applications and perspectives for tropical rain forest tree species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 27, 387-421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bal, D., Beuje, H.M., Hoogeveen, Y.R., Jansen, S.R.J. and Van der Reest, P.J. (1995). Handbook Natuurdoeltypen in Nederland, IKC-Nuurbeheer, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  3. Conroy, M.J. and Barry, R.N. (1996). Mapping of species richness for conservation of biological diversity: Conceptual and methodological issues. Ecological Applications, 6(3), 763-773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeGroot, R., Wilson, M.A. and Boumans, R.M.J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393-408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duelli, P. (1997) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: An approach at two different scales, Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 62(2-3), 81-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairbanks, D.H.K., Reyers, B. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (2001). Species and environment representation: selecting reserves for the retention of avian diversity in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation, 98(3), 365-379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faith, D.P. and Walker, P.A. (1996). How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? : On hotspots, complementarity, and pattern-based approaches, Biodiversity Letters, 3(1), 18-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faith, P.D. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61, 1-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farber, S.C., Costanza, R. and Wilson, M.A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 375-392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geneletti, D. (2003). Biodiversity Impact Assessment of roads: an approach based on ecosystem rarity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 343–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geneletti, D. (2004). Using spatial indicators and value functions to assess ecosystem fragmentation caused by linear infrastructures. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hermy, M. and Cornelis, J. (2000). Towards a monitoring method and a number of multifaced and hierarchical biodiversity indicators for urban and suburban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49, 149-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Humphries, C.J., Williams, P.H. and Vane-Wright, R.I. (1995). Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 93-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IUCN (1993). IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Lenders, H.J.R., Leuven, R.S.E.W., Nienhuis, P.H., de Nooij, R.J.W. and Van Rooij, S.A.M. (2001). BIO-SAFE: a method for evaluation of biodiversity values on a basis of political and legal criteria. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 121-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindenmayer, D.B. and Lacy, R.C. (1995). Metapopulation viability of arboreal marsupials in fragmented old-growth forests: Comparison among species. Ecological Applications, 5(1), 183-199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morimoto, J., Wilson, M. A., Voinov, H. and Costanza, R. (2003) Estimating Watershed Biodiversity: An Empirical Study of the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland, USA. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 7(2), 150-162.Google Scholar
  18. Noss, R.F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4, 355-364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliver, I. and Beattie, A.J. (1996). Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: A test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications, 6(2), 594-607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pino, J., Roda, F., Ribas, J. and Pons, X. (2000). Landscape structure and bird species richness: implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49, 35-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwab, A., Dubois, D., Fried, P.M. and Edwards, P.J. (2002). Estimating the biodiversity of hay meadows in north-eastern Switzerland on the basis of vegetation structure. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 915, 13.Google Scholar
  22. Venema, H.D., Calamai, P.H. and Fieguth, P. (2005). Forest structure optimization using evolutionary programming and landscape ecology metric. European Journal of Operational Research, 164, 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, P.H., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Humphries, C.J. (1991). Measuring biodiversity: taxonomic relations for conservation priorities. Aust. Syst. Bot., 4, 665-669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams, S.E. and Hero, J. (2001). Multiple determinants of Australian tropical frog biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 98(1), 1-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson, M.A. and Howarth, R.B. (2002). Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics, 41, 431-443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Morimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Nihon UniversityKanagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations