Advertisement

Ecological Networks, from Concept to Implementation

  • R.H.G. Jongman
Chapter

Abstract

The conceptual and theoretical core of landscape ecology links natural sciences with related human sciences and human activity with landscape pattern, process and change and its impacts. Generating ecological networks means modeling species and landscape patterns. The concept of ecological networks is especially applicable in highly fragmented landscapes where species behave as metapopulations. Analysis of habitat availability is an important precondition for planning ecological networks. However, also the communication with the stakeholders is crucial when ecological networks have to be realized. As ecological network planning means biodiversity management outside protected nature reserves and parks, it also means confrontation between interests and finding ways for cooperation between all users of the wider landscape.

Keywords

Landscape Pattern Fragmented Landscape Ecological Network Population Viability Analysis Ecological Corridor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, A.F. (1999). Linkages in the Landscape. The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, G. (2004). Integrating Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use, Lessons Learnt from Ecological Networks. IUCN Gland.Google Scholar
  3. Bennet, G. and Wit, P. (2001). The Development and Application of Ecological Networks. A Review of Proposals, Plans and Programmes. AIDenvironment, Amsterdam, 131p.Google Scholar
  4. Bolck, M., De Togni, G. Van der Sluis, Th and Jongman, R.H.G. (2004). >From models to reality: design and implementation process. In R.H.G. Jongman and G. Pungetti (Eds.), Ecological Networks and Greenways, Concept, Design and Implementation (pp. 128-150). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dale, V.H. (2000). ESA report, Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecological Applications, 10, 639-670Google Scholar
  6. Florida Greenways Commission (1994). Creating a Statewide Greenways System, for People, for Wildlife, for Florida. Report to the Governor. Tallahassee.Google Scholar
  7. Hanski, I.A, Gilpin, M.E. (1997). Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Hubert, B. (1991). Changing land uses in the Provence (France): Multiple land use as a management tool. In J. Baudry and R.G.H. Bunce (Eds.), Land Abandonment and Its Role in Conservation (pp. 31-52). Options Mediterranéennes Série Séminaires 15.Google Scholar
  9. ECNC. (2004). The Pan-European Ecological Network and People – Background paper as well as “Conclusions and Recommendations”of the 2004 seminar on “People and PEEN” in The Hague, the Netherlands (ECNC/LNV).Google Scholar
  10. James, P. Undated. Ecological Networks: Creating Landscapes for People and Wildlife.Google Scholar
  11. Jongman, R.H.G. (1995). Nature Conservation Planning in Europe: Developing Ecological Networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32,169-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jongman R.H.G. (2002). Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landscape and urban planning, 58, 211-221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jongman, R.H.G., Külvik, M. and Kristiansen. I. (2004). European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 305-319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jongman, R.H.G. and Pungetti, G.P. (2004). Ecological Networks and Greenways: Concept, Design and Implementation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lande R. (1988). Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). Oecologia, 75, 601-607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lankester, K., van Apeldoorn, R.C. Meelis, E. and Verboom, J. (1991). Management perspectives for populations of the Eurasian badger Meles meles in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 561-573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lette H. and N. Rozemeijer. (2005). Broadening and Diversifying the Financial Basis for Sustainable Forest Management and Nature Conservation. IAC/WUR, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Levins, R., 1970. Extinction. In M. Gerstenhaber (Ed.). Some Mathematical Problems in Biology (pp. 77-107), American Mathematical Society, Providence.Google Scholar
  19. Lindenmayer, D.B. and Possingham, H.P. (1994). The Risk of Extinction: Ranking Management Options for Leadbeater’s Possum Using PVA. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, ANU, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Lindenmayer, D.B. and Possingham, H.P. (1995). Modelling the viability of metapopulations of the endangered Leadbeater’s possum in south-eastern Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 984- 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Machado, J.R., Ahern, J., Da Saraiva G, Da Silva M.A., Rocha J., Ferreira, J.C., Sousa, P.M. and Roqueta, R. (1997). Greenways Network for the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon. In J.R. Machado and J. Ahern (Eds.), Environmental Challenges in an expanding Urban World and the role of emerging Information Technologies (pp. 281-289). CNIG Lisbon Portugal.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, K. (1996). Balancing the Scales: Guidelines for Increasing Biodiversity’s Chances through Bioregional Management. WRI, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  23. Ministry of ANF (2004). Ecological Networks: Experiences in the Netherlands. “A Joint Responsibility for Connectivity”. Working paper.Google Scholar
  24. Opdam, P. (1988). Populations in fragmented landscape. In K.-F. Schreiber (Ed.) , Connectivity in Landscape Ecology. Proceedings second International Seminar of the IALE in Münster: Münstersche Geographische Arbeiten, 29, 75-77.Google Scholar
  25. Opdam, P. (1991). Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecology, 5, 93-106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Opdam P., Steingröver, E. and van Rooij, S. (2003). Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multiactor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 322-332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabbinge R., Van Latesteijn, H.C. and Smeets, P.J.A.M. (1996). Planning consequences of long-term land use scenarios in the European Union. In R.H.G. Jongman (Ed.), Ecological and Landscape Consequences of Land Use Change in Europe (pp. 36-51). Proceedings of the first ECNC seminar on land use change and its ecological consequences. ECNC series on Man and Nature 2.Google Scholar
  28. Rientjes, S. (2000). Communicating Nature Conservation. ECNCGoogle Scholar
  29. Sepp, K. and Kaasik, A. (2002). Development of National Ecological Networks in the Baltic Countries in the Framework of the Pan-European Ecological Network. IUCN Central Europe.Google Scholar
  30. Shaffer, M.L. (1987). Minimum Viable Populations: coping with uncertainty. In M.E. Soulé (Ed.), Viable Populations for Conservation (pp. 69-86). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Somma, D., Aued, M.B. and Bachman, L. (2004). The ecological Networks development in the Yungas, Argentina: planning, economic and social aspects. In R.H.G. Jongman and G. Pungetti (Eds.): Ecological Networks and Greenways, Concept, Design and Implementation (pp. 251- 269), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tilman, D., May, R.M., Lehman, C.L., Nowak, M.A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Verboom, J., R. Foppen, P. Chardon, P. Opdam, and P. Luttikhuizen. 2001. Introducing the key patch appoach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds. Biological Conservation, 100, 89-101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Verboom J. and Pouwels, R. (2004). Ecological functioning of ecological networks: a species perspective. In R.H.G. Jongman and G. Pungetti (Eds.), Ecological networks and greenways, concept, design and implementation (pp. 56- 72). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Vos, C.C., Verboom, J., Opdam, P., Ter Braak, C.J.F. (2001). Towards ecologically scaled landscape indices. American Naturalist, 183, 24-41.Google Scholar
  36. Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative (2006). 2005 Year End Report Canmore Canada, 10 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.H.G. Jongman
    • 1
  1. 1.Wageningen UR Alterrathe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations