Trends And Future Researches In Green Space Design

Toward practical planning
  • K. Nagashima


This paper reviews the essential planning process of green space design based on the concept of ecosystem management together with the recent technical trends and required data set applicable at each process. The techniques reviewed in this paper contribute toward the accomplishment of the goals of protecting the entire spectrum of biodiversity, ensure their persistence, and accommodate human use within these constraints; these are the three main goals of ecosystem management. The future researches to be carried out for supporting practical green space planning have also been discussed.


Green Space Conservation Biology Ecosystem Management Dung Beetle Biological Conservation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, C.R., Pearlstine, L.G., Wojcik, D.P., and Kitchens, W.M. (2001). The spatial distribution of diversity between disparate taxa: Spatial correspondence between mammals and ants across South Florida, U. S. A. Landscape Ecology, 16, 453-464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andelman, S.J., and Willing, M.R. (2002). Alternative configurations of conservation reserves for Paraguayan bats: Considerations of spatial scale. Conservation Biology, 16, 1352-1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando, A.A., Camm, J., Polasky, S. and Solow, A. (1998). Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation Science, 279, 2126-2128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araujo, M.B. and Humphries, C.J. (2001). Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? Ecography, 24, 103-110Google Scholar
  5. Awimbo, J.A., Norton, D.A., and Overmars, F.B. (1996). An evaluation of representativeness for nature conservation, Hokitika ecological district, New Zealand. Biological Conservation, 75, 177-186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balmford, A., Moore, J.L., Brooks, T., Burgess, N., Hansen, L.A., Williams, P. and Rahbek, C. (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science, 291, 2616-2619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L., and Keith, D.A. (1992). A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis Biological Conservation, 62, 115-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belbin, L. (1993). Environmental representativeness: Regional partitioning and reserve selectionBiological Conservation, 66, 223-230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger, J. (1997). Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conservation Biology, 11, 69-78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bifolchi, A. and Lode, T. (2005). Efficiency of conservation shortcuts: An investigation with otters as umbrella species. Biological Conservation, 126, 523-527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brody, S.D. (2003). Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through local land use planning. Population and Environment, 24 (6), 511-540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooker, L. (2002). The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighbourhood as a template. Landscape and Urban planning, 60, 185-210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buzas, M. A. (1972). Patterns of species diversity and their explanation. Taxon, 21, 275-286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cabeza, M. and Moilanen, A. (2001). Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16 (5), 242-248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caicco, S. L., Scott, J. M., Butterfield, B., and Csuti, B. (1995). A Gap analysis of the management status of the vegetation of Idaho (USA). Conservation Biology, 9, 498-511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carignan, V. and Villard, M. (2002) Selecting indicator species to monitor ecological integrity: A review Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 78, 45-61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen, N., Bartuska, A., Brown, J., Carpenter, S., D’Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J., MacMahon, J., Noss, R., Parsons, D., Petterson, C., Turner, M. and Woodmansee, R. (1996). The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications, 6, 665-91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cortner, H. and Moote, M. (1999). The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowling, R.M., Pressey, R.L., Rouget, M. and Lombard, A.T. (2003). A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot: the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation, 112, 191- 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P.H., Pressey, R.L., Camm, J.D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A.R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M. and Sahr, K. (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation, 80, 83-97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dobson, A.P., Rodriguez, J.P., Roberts, W.M. and Wilcove, D.S. (1997). Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science, 275, 550-553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faith, D.P. and Norris, R.H., (1989). Correlation of environmental variables with patterns of distribution and abundance of common and rare freshwater macroinvertebrates. Biological Conservation, 50, 77- 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faith, D.P., Margules, C.R. and Walker, P.A. (2001). A biodiversity conservation plan for Papua New Guinea based on biodiversity tradeoffs analysis. Pacific Conservation Biology, 6, 304-324Google Scholar
  24. Ferrier, S., Pressey, R.L. and Barrett, T.W. (2000). A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biological Conservation, 93, 303-325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleishman, E., Murphy, D.D. and Brussard, P.F. (2000). A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications, 10 (2): 569-579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frazee, S.R., Cowling, R.M., Pressey, R.L., Turpie, J.K. and Lindenberg, N. (2003). Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case study of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa Biological Conservation, 112, 275-290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freudenberger, D. and Brooker, L. (2004). Development of the focal species approach for biodiversity conservation in the temperate agricultural zones of Australia Biodiversity and Conservation, 13: 253- 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Groves, C.R., Jensen, D.B., Valutis, L.L., Redford, K.H., Shaffer, M.L., Scott, J.M., Baumgartner, J.V., Higgins, J.V., Beck, M.W. and Anderson, M.G. (2002). Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. BioScience, 52, 499-512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grunbine, R.E. (1994). What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology, 8 (1), 27-38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haines-Young, R. (1999). Landscape pattern: Context and process. In J. A., Wiens and M. R. Moss (Eds.) Issues in Landscape Ecology. (pp. 33-37). International Association for Landscape Ecology, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard, P.C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T.R.B., Kigenyi, F.W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C.J., Lwanga, J.S., Matthews, R.A. and Balmford, A. (1998). Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature, 394, 472-475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jennings, M.D. (2000). Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology, 15, 5- 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kakizawa, H. (2000). Ecosystem Management. Tsukiji-shokan Co., TokyoGoogle Scholar
  34. Kiester, A.R., Scott, J.M., Csuti, B., Noss, R.F., Butterfield, B., Sahr, K. and White, D. (1996) Conservation prioritization using gap data. Conservation Biology, 10 (5), 1332-1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirkpatrick, J.B. and Brown, M.J. (1994). A comparison of direct and environmental domain approaches to planning reservation of forest higher plant communities and species in Tasmania. Conservation Biology, 8 (1), 217-224Google Scholar
  36. Kremen, C. (1992). Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring Ecological Applications, 2 (2), 203-217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lambeck, R.J. (1997). Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 11, 849-856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Landres, P.B., Verner, J. and Thomas, W. (1988). Ecological uses of vertebrate indicator species: a critique. Conservation Biology, 2, 316-328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawler, J.J. and Schumaker, N.H. (2004). Evaluating habitat as a surrogate for population viability a spatially explicit population model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 94, 85-100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lombard, A.T., Cowling, R.M., Pressey, R.L. and Mustart, P.J. (1997). Reserve selection in a speciesrich and fragmented landscape on the Agulhas Plain, South Africa. Conservation Biology, 11, 1101- 1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Margules, C.R. and Pressey, R.L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243-253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988). Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation, 43, 663-676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Usher, M.B. (1994). Apparent species turnover, probability of extinction and the selection of nature reserves: a case study of the Ingleborough limes stone pavements. Conservation Biology, 8, 398-409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Martikainen, P., Kaila, L. and Haila, Y. (1998). Threatened beetles in White-Backed Woodpecker habitats. Conservation Biology, 12, 293-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merrill, E.H., Kohley, T.W., Herdendorf, M.E., Reiners, W.A., Driese, I.K.L., Marrs, R.W. and Anderson, S.H. (1996). The Wyoming Gap Analysis Project final report. Retrieved December 5, 2005, from US. Geological Survey GAP homepage: Scholar
  46. Mittermeier, R.A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J.B., da Fonseca, G.A.B. and Olivieri, S. (1998). Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities Conservation Biology, 12, 516-520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicholls, A.O. and Margules, C.R. (1993). An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation, 64, 165-169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Noss, R.F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4, 355-364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Noss, R.F., Carroll, C., Vance-Borland, K. and Wuerthner, G. (2002) A multicriteria assessment of the irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Conservation Biology, 16, 895-908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Noss, R.F. (1987). From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the Nature Conservancy (USA). Biological Conservation, 41, 11-37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Opdam, P., Foppen, R. and Vos, C. (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 16, 767-779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearson, D.L. and Cassola, F. (1992). World-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles: indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conservation Biology, 6, 376-391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pimm, S. L. and Lawton, J.H. (1998). Planning for biodiversity. Science, 279, 2068-2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poiani, K.A., Merrill, M.D. and Chapman, K.A. (2001). Identifying conservation priority areas in a fragmented Minnesota landscape based on the umbrella species concept and selection of large patches of natural vegetation. Conservation Biology, 15 (2), 513-522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M. and Lawton, J.H. (1999). The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology, 13 (3), 484-492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C. and Gibbons, D.W. (1993). Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, 365, 335-337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pressey, R.L. and Logan, V.S. (1995). Reserve coverage and requirements in relation to partitioning and generalization of land classes: Analyses for western New South Wales. Conservation Biology, 9, 1506-1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989a). Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches. Biological Conservation, 50, 199-218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989b). Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biological Conservation, 50, 263-278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pressey, R.L. and Taffs, K.H. (2001). Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss Biological Conservation, 100, 355-376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pressey, R.L., Ferrier, S., Hutchinson, C.D., Sivertsen, D.P. and Manion, G. (1995). Planning for negotiation: using an interactive geographic information system to explore alternative protected area networks. In D. A. Saunders, Craig, J.L. and Mattiske, E.M. (Eds.), Nature conservation: The Role of Networks (pp. 23-33.). Surrey Beatty and Sons, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  62. Pressey, R.L., Possingham, H.P. and Day, J.R. (1997). Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation, 80, 207-219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pressey, R.L., Possingham, H.P. and Margules, C.R. (1996). Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? Biological Conservation, 76, 259-267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rebelo, A.G. and Siegfried, W.R. (1990). Protection of Fynbos vegetation: ideal and real world options Biological Conservation, 54, 15-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reid, W.V. (1998). Biodiversity hotspots. TREE 13 (7): 275-280Google Scholar
  66. Rubinoff, D. (2001). Evaluating the California Gnatcatcher as an umbrella species for conservation of Southern California coastal sage scrub. Conservation Biology, 15 (5), 1374-1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sarakinos, H., Nicholls, A.O., Tubert, A., Aggarwal, A., Margules, C.R. and Sarkar, S. (2001). Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Quebec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 1419-1472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schall, J.J. and Pianka, E.K., (1978). Geographical trends in number of species. Science, 20, 679-686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schumaker, N. (1996). Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology, 77, 1210-1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scott, J.M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R.F., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S., D’Erchia, F., Edwards, T.C., Jr., Ulliman, J. and Wright, G. (1993). Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs, 123Google Scholar
  71. Simberloff, D. (1998). Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation, 83, 247-257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stoms, D.M. (2000). GAP management status and regional indicators of threats to biodiversity Landscape Ecology, 15, 21-33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Strittholt, J.R. and Boerner, R.E.J. (1995). Applying biodiversity gap analysis in a regional nature reserve design for the edge of Appalachia, Ohio (USA). Conservation Biology, 9, 1492-1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Suter, W., Graf, R.G. and Hess, R. (2002). Capercaillie and Avian biodiversity: Testing the umbrella species concept. Conservation Biology, 16 (3), 778-788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Szaro, R., Sexton, W. and Malone, C. (1998). The emergence of ecosystem management as a tool for meeting people’s needs and sustaining ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40, 1-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Theobald, D.M., Hobbs, N.T., Bearly, T., Zack, J.A., Shenk, T. and Riebsame, W.E. (2000) Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision-making: designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology, 15, 35-45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thompson, K. and Jones, A. (1999). Human population density and prediction of local plant extinction in Britain. Conservation Biology, 13, 185-189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turpie, J.K. (1995). Prioritizing South African estuaries for conservation: a practical example using waterbirds. Biological Conservation, 74, 175-185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van Jaarsveld, A.S., Freitag, S., Chown, S.L., Muller, C., Koch, S., Hull, H., Bellamy, C., Kruger, M., Endrody-Younga, S., Mansell, M.W. and Scholtz, C.H. (1998). Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science, 279, 2106-2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vos, C.C., Verboom, J., Opdam, P.F. and Ter Braak, C.J.F. (2001). Towards ecologically scaled landscape indices. The American Naturalist, 157, 24-51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wallis de Vries, M.F. (1995). Large herbivores and the design of nature reserves in Western EuropeConservation Biology, 9, 25-33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Watson, J., Freudenberger, D. and Paull, D. (2001). An assessment of the focal-species approach for conserving birds in variegated landscapes in Southeastern Australia. Conservation Biology, 15, 1364- 1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wessels, K.J., Freitag, S. and van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1999) The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at a local scale. Biological Conservation, 89, 21-28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. White, D., Minotti, P.G., Barczak, M.K., Sifneos, J.C., Freemark, K.E., Santelmann, M.V., Steinitz, C.F., Kiester, A.R. and Preston, E.M. (1997). Assessing risks to biodiversity from future landscape changeConservation Biology, 11, 349-360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilcove, D. (1993). Getting ahead of the extinction curve. Ecological Applications, 3, 218-220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Williams, P.H., Burgess, N.D. and Rahbek, C. (2000). Flagship species, ecological complementarity and conserving the diversity of mammals and birds in sub-Saharan Africa. Animal Conservation, 3, 249- 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C. and Pressey, R. (1996). A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British Birds. Conservation Biology, 10, 155-174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Williams, R.H. and Gaston, K.J. (1994). Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biological Conservation, 67, 211-217Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Nagashima
    • 1
  1. 1.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations