This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allison PD, 1995 Survival analysis using the SAS® system: a practical guide SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC 292 pp ISBN: 1-55544-279-X
Arrow KJ, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, ShumanH, 1993 Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation Federal register, 58:4601–4614
Berger RL, Hsu JC (1996) Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence, Statistical Science, 11(4):283–302
Bergland O, Magnussen K, Navrud S (2002) Benefit transfer: testing for accuracy and reliability In: Florax, RJGM, P Nijkamp and K Willis (eds) 2002: Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA 117–132
Bergland O, Romstad E, Kim S, McLeod D (1993) The use of bootstrapping in contingent valuation studies Unpublished working paper Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås
Brookshire DS, Neill HR (1992) Benefit transfers—conceptual and empirical issues Water resources research, 28(3):651–655
Brouwer R, Spaninks A (1999) The validity of environmental benefit transfer: further empirical testing Environmental and resource economics, 14:95–117
Brouwer R (2000) Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects Ecological Economics, 32(1):137–152
Burda M, Wyplosz C (1997) Macroeconomics: a European text – 2nd edn Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 613, ISBN: 0-19-877468-0
Cooper JC (1994) A comparison of approaches to calculating confidence-intervals for benefit measures from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys Land economics, 70(1):111–122
Desvousges WH, Naughton MC, Parsons GR (1992) Benefit Transfer: Conceptual Problems in Estimating Water Quality Benefits Using Existing Studies. Water Resources Research, 28(3): 675–683
Downing M, Ozuna T (1996) Testing the reliability of the benefit transfer approach Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 30:316–322
Greene WH (2000) Econometric Analysis Prentice Hall International New Jersey ISBN: 0-13-015679-5
Hauck WW, Anderson S (1984) A new statistical procedure for testing equivalence in two-group comparative bioavailability trials, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12(1): 83–91
Hoenig JM, Heisey DM (2001) The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis American Statistician 55(1): 19–24
Kirchhoff S, Colby BG, LaFrance JT (1997) Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry Journal of environmental economics and management, 33(1):75–93
Kristofersson D, Navrud S (2005) Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer: Are we performing the wrong tests? Environmental and Resource Economics 30(3):279–286
Kriström B (1997) Spike models in contingent valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79:1013–1023
Lehman EL (1983) Theory of point estimation, Wiley: New York
Lindsey JC, Ryan LM (1998) Tutorial in biostatistics–Methods for interval-censored data Statistics in medicine, 17(2):219–238
Loomis JB (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer—Benefit function transfer Water resources research, 28(3):701–705
Loomis J, Roach B, Ward F, Ready R (1995) Testing transferability of recreation demand models across regions—A study of corps of engineer reservoirs Water Resources Research, 31(3):721–730
Navrud S, Pruckner GJ (1997) Environmental valuation - To use or not to use? A comparative study of the United States and Europe Environmental and Resource Economics 10:1–26
Notaro S, Signorello G (1999) Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: a comparison among multiple bounded, double bounded, single bounded and open-ended formats EAERA 9th annual conference, Oslo 25–27, June 1999
Ready RC, Navrud S, Dubourg R (2001) How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness To Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions? Land Economics, 77 (3):315–326
Ready R, Navrud S, Day B, Dubourg R, Machado F, Mourato S, Spanninks F,Rodriquez MXV (2004) Benefit Transfer in Europe How Reliable Are Transfers Between Countries? Environmental and Resource Economics 29:67–82
Reiser B, Shechter M (1999) Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits, Environmetrics, 10:87–101
Schuirmann DJ (1987) A comparison of the two one-sided procedure and the power approach for assessing equivalence of average bioavailability, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 15(6):657–680
Stegner, BL, A G Bostrom and T K Greenfield 1996 Equivalence testing for use in psychosocial and services research: An introduction with examples, Evaluation and Program Planning 19(3):193–98
Toivonen, Anna-Liisa; Appelblad, Håkan; Bengtsson, Bo; Geertz-Hansen, Peter; Gudbergsson, Gudni; Kristofersson, Dadi; Kyrkjebø, Hilde; Navrud, Ståle; Roth, Eva; Tuunainen, Pekka & Weissglas, Gösta (2000) The Economic Value of Recreational Fisheries in the Nordic Countries TEMA Nord Rapport 2000:604, 68 pp ISSN: 0908-6692; Nordisk Ministerråd; København
Welling, PG, FLS Tse and SV Dighe (1992) Pharmaceutical Bioequivalence, Marcel Dekker: New York
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
KristÒFersson, D., Navrud, S. (2007). Can use and Non-use Values Be Transferred Across Countries?. In: Navrud, S., Ready, R. (eds) Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5405-X_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5405-X_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4081-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5405-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)